Cover not available
Part of
Variation in Second and Heritage Languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston and Xiaoshi Li
[Studies in Language Variation 28] 2022
► pp. 71–96

Chapter 4
Cross-linguistic influence in the acquisition of L3 variation

A comparison of speech and writing

ORCID logo | National University of Singapore
This chapter addresses stylistic and obligatory variation in third language (L3) argument realization patterns. It focuses on the effects of formal second language (L2) learning experience, typological proximity, and five linguistic factors (discourse type, clause type, verb type, NP animacy, NP person). A corpus analysis of L3 Korean spoken production demonstrates that the considered linguistic and developmental factors do influence spoken L3 variation patterns to a certain extent. However, for the early bilingual participants, the analysis found a strong influence of their first languages (L1s) on their L3 spoken production, particularly in associating animacy with case. This L1 influence overrides the benefits of formal L2 learning experience and typological proximity on variation patterns in accusative argument realization, which were found in a prior study of L3 writing (Park & Starr 2019). The findings imply that it may take longer to acquire target-like sociolinguistic competence in L3 speech than in L3 writing.
Keywords: third language, argument realization, variation, animacy, multilingualism, transfer, Korean, early bilinguals
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Acquisition of a third language
  • The acquisition of Ln variation patterns
    • Variation in Korean argument realization
  • Research questions
  • The study
    • Participants
    • Data collection
    • Coding and analysis
  • Results: Linguistic factors
    • Type 2 variation
    • Type 1 variation
  • Results: Developmental factors
    • Type 2 variation
    • Type 1 variation
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.28.04par
References (43)
References
Bardel, Camilla & Ylva Falk. 2007. The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research 23. 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 2007. Second language acquisition: A variationist perspective. In Robert Bayley & Ceil Lucas (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications, 133–144. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Robert & Dennis R. Preston. 2008. Variation and second language grammars. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1(2). 385–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Robert & Vera Regan, Vera. 2004. Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(3). 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen. 1988. Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology 24. 560–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, Jennifer & Jason Rothman. 2010. On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics 48. 275–296.Google Scholar
Cenoz, Jasone. 2003. The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism 7(1). 71–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Ylva, Christina Lindqvist & Camilla Bardel. 2015. The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2). 227–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne, Claire Foley & Inna Vinnitskaya. 2004. The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1. 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, Björn. 2001. Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production. In Jasone Cenoz, Britta Hufeisen & Ulrike Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 21–41. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, Jan H. & Elaine Marchena. 1989. Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3). 241–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaensch, Carol. 2009. L3 enhanced feature sensitivity as a result of higher proficiency in the L2. In Yan-kit Ingrid Leung (ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar, 115–143. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessner, Ulrich. 2006. Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Li & Robert Bayley. 2002. Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(2). 103–116.Google Scholar
Kim, Taeho. 2008. Subject and object markings in conversational Korean. Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Klein, Elaine C. 1995. Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference?. Language Learning 45(3). 419–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, Batia & Stig Eliasson. 1993. What causes avoidance in L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1). 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Yan-kit Ingrid. 2005. L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8. 39–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Ping, Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney. 1993. Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 32(2). 169–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi. 2010. Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a second language. Language Learning 60. 366–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Variation of subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36. 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Stylistic variation in L1 and L2 Chinese: Native speakers, learners, teachers, and textbooks. Chinese as a Second Language 52. 55–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi, Xiaoqing Chen & Wen-Hsin Chen. 2012. Variation of subject pronominal expression in Mandarin Chinese. Sociolinguistic Studies 6. 91–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1987. Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics 8. 315–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Terry Nadasdi & Katherine Rehner. 2010. The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Katherine Rehner & Terry Nadasdi. 2004. The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8 (3). 408–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Mihi & Rebecca L. Starr. 2015. The role of formal L2 learning experience in L3 acquisition among early bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism 13. 294–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The acquisition of L3 variation among early bilinguals: The roles of L2 experience, home language and linguistic factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10(2). 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, Vera. 1995. The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In Barbara F. Freed (ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, 245–268. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In Robert Bayley & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, 177–202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, Vera, Martin Howard & Isabelle Lemée. 2009. The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman Jason. 2011. L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research 27(1). 107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason. 2015. Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2). 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz, Cristina. 2000. Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics 21(1). 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, Roumyana. 2017. The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(6). 651–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L. 2017. Sociolinguistic variation and acquisition in two-way language immersion: Negotiating the standard. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jacqueline. 1988. The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9(3). 235–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Qi, Diane Lillo-Martin, Catherine T. Best & Andrea Levitt. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2(3). 221–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2019. Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research. 37(3). 379–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit, Natalia Mitrofanova, Roksolana Mykhaylyk & Yulia Rodina. 2017. Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(6). 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar