I use computer-mediated discourse analysis (Herring, 2004) to investigate one online weight-loss discussion board thread that revolves around medical metadiscourse – an original poster’s depiction of a face-to-face interaction in which a doctor made an unwelcome comment about her weight. Extending research on “small stories” (e.g. Georgakopoulou, 2007) and narrative problem-solving (Ochs, Smith and Taylor, 1989), I demonstrate how participants co-create a small story that works through the original poster’s dilemma – how she should interpret and react to what happened. I identify six intertextual linking strategies that accomplish this – posing information-seeking questions, paraphrasing and reframing, creating “constructed dialogue” (Tannen, 2007), using the board’s quotation function, pointing (such as through the “^” symbols in this chapter’s title), and advice-giving – while also showing how meaning-making in doctor-patient interactions extends beyond medical encounters themselves to online contexts. Further, analysis of the posts’ contents reveals what Sarangi (in press) calls a “role responsibility framework” for medical care: Participants attribute responsibility for the problematic encounter to both the doctor and patient/original poster.
Al Zidjaly, Najma (2010). Intertextuality and constructing Islamic identities online. In R. Taiwo (Ed.), Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication: Language structures and social interaction (pp. 191–204). Hershey, NJ: IGI Global.
Ba, Sulin & Wang, Lei (2013). Digital health communities: The effect of their motivation mechanisms. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 941–947.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (V.W. McGee, Trans.) (pp. 60–102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bamberg, Michael, & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.
Cazden, Courtney B. (1976). Play with language and meta-linguistic awareness: One dimension of language experience. In J.S. Bruner, A. Jolly & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play—Its role in development and evolution (pp. 603–608). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). About BMI for adults. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Craig, Robert T. (2005). How we talk about how we talk: Communication theory in the public interest. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 659-667.
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, Cynthia, Barton, Ellen, Meert, Kathleen L., Eggly, Susan, Pollack, Murray, Zimmerman, Jerry, Adnand, K.J.S., Carcillo, Joseph, Newth, Christopher J.L., Dean, J. Michael, Willson, Douglas F., Nicholson, Carolthe Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network, & (2009). Accounting for medical communication: Parents’ perceptions of communicative roles and responsibilities in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Communication & Medicine, 6(2), 177–188.
Gordon, Cynthia, & Luke, Melissa (2013). Re- and pre-authoring experiences in email supervision: Creating and revising professional meanings in an asynchronous medium. In D. Tannen & A.M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 167–181). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hamilton, Heidi E. (1996). Intratextuality, intertextuality, and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer’s disease. Text, 16(1), 61–90.
Hamilton, Heidi E. (1998). Reported speech and survivor identity in on-line bone marrow transplantation narratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2(1), 53–67.
Harrison, Sandra, & Barlow, Julie (2009). Politeness strategies and advice-giving in an online arthritis workshop. Journal of Politeness Research, 5(1), 93–111.
Herring, Susan C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4),
Herring, Susan C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online communities. In S.A. Barab, R. Kling & J.H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodsdon-Champeon, Connie (2010). Conversations within conversations: Intertextuality in racially antagonistic online discourse. Language@Internet, 7, article 10. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Jackson, Cathy, & Gray, Carol (2005). The dog’s too fat and so is the client: How to handle delicate consultations. In Practice, 27(4), 219–221.
Johnstone, Barbaraet al. (1994). Repetition in discourse: A dialogue. In B. Johnstone (Ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, (Vol 1, pp. 1–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Kouper, Inna (2010). The pragmatics of peer advice in a LiveJournal community. Language@Internet, 7 article 1. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Kristeva, Julia (1980 [1967]). Word, dialogue and novel. In L.S. Roudiez (Ed.), Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (T. Gora, A. Jardine & L.S. Roudiez, Trans.) (pp. 64–91). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Labov, William (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linell, Per, & Bredmar, Margaret (1996). Reconstructing topical sensitivity: Aspects of face-work in talks between midwives and expectant mothers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 347–79.
Locher, Miriam A. (2006). Advice online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Locher, Miriam A. 2013. Internet advice. In S. Herring, D. Stein & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 339–362). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lutfey, Karen, & Douglas W. Maynard (1998). Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 321–341.
Markham, Annette, & Buchanan, Elizabeth (with contributions from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee) (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mitra, Ananda (1999). Characteristics of WWW text: Tracing discursive strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Comunication, 5(1).
Morrow, Phillip R. (2006). Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features. Discourse Studies, 8(4), 531–548.
Ochs, Elinor, Smith, Ruth, & Taylor, Carolyn (1989). Detective stories at dinnertime: Problem-solving through co-narration. Cultural Dynamics, 2(2), 238–257.
Page, Ruth (2010). Re-examining narrativity: Small stories in status updates. Text & Talk, 30(4), 423–444.
Sarangi, Srikant (in press, 2015). Owning responsible actions/selves: Role-relational trajectories in counseling for childhood genetic testing. In J.-O. Östman & A. Solin (Eds.), Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings. London: Equinox.
Severinson Eklund, Kerstin (2010). To quote or not to quote: Setting the context for computer-mediated dialogues. Language@Internet 7(5). Retrieved from [URL].
Sharf, Barbara F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women & Health, 26(1), 65–84.
Smithson, Janet, Sharkey, Siobhan, Hewis, Elaine, Jones, Ray, Emmens, Tobit, Ford, Tamsin, & Owens, Christabel (2011). Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies, 13(4), 487–501.
Stephens, Mark B. (2009). Clinical commentary: Take a direct approach to excess weight. The Journal of Family Practice, 58, 431.
Stommel, Wyke, & Koole, Tom (2010). The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 357–378.
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57–76). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah (2007 [1989]). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vayreda, Agnès, & Antaki, Charles (2009). Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online forum. Qualitative Health Research, 19(7), 931–942.
Verschueren, Jef (1999). Understanding pragmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Webb, Helena (2009). “I’ve put weight on cos I’ve bin inactive, cos I’ve ’ad me knee done’: Moral work in the obesity clinic.” Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(6), 854–871.
West, Laura (2013). Facebook sharing: A sociolinguistic analysis of computer-mediated storytelling. Discourse, Context & Media, 2(1), 1–13.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Zabielska, Magdalena
2024. „Leczenie COVID-19 u pacjenta” a „Nie lekceważmy zagrożenia 'koronką'". Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:2 ► pp. 31 ff.
2019. Society in digital contexts: New modes of identity and community construction. Multilingua 38:4 ► pp. 357 ff.
Gordon, Cynthia
2019. “You might want to look up the definition of ‘continental breakfast’”: Other-initiated repair and community-building in health and weight loss blogs. Multilingua 38:4 ► pp. 401 ff.
Williams, Serena A.P. & Soneet Dhillon
2019. Women's obstetric and reproductive health care discourse in online forums: Perceived access and quality pre- and post-Affordable Care Act. Preventive Medicine 124 ► pp. 50 ff.
Gordon, Cynthia & Didem İkizoğlu
2017. ‘Asking for another’ online: Membership categorization and identity construction on a food and nutrition discussion board. Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 253 ff.
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.