Cover not available
Article published In:
Morphology and emotions across the world's languages
Edited by Maïa Ponsonnet and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 42:1] 2018
► pp. 146–181

The rise and fall of Mojeño diminutives through the centuries

 | Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, (CNRS & Université de Lyon)
This paper investigates the diachrony of diminutives in Mojeño across four centuries. First, it shows that the three Mojeño diminutives have two lexical sources: ‘child’ and ‘seed’. This constitutes a counterexample to Jurafsky’s (1996) theory concerning the universal source of diminutives. Second, the paper investigates the grammaticalization process of diminutives and their further distributional and functional changes. It shows that the extension of the distribution onto verbs and grammatical parts of speech correlates with the gain of emotional connotations. It describes the evolution of emotional connotations of the diminutives and the pragmaticalization of their interactional functions until the eventual shift to purely expressive morphemes when diminutives lose their core meaning of ‘smallness’. Third, since each of the three language varieties has one ‘true’ diminutive only, two successive cycles of diminutive renewal are hypothesized, whereby an old diminutive is replaced by a new one.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Diminutives in Old Mojeño
  • 3.Diminutives and associated expressive markers in the Mojeño Ignaciano dialect
    • 3.1-chicha
    • 3.2-tsitsa
    • 3.3-sami
  • 4.Diminutives and associated expressive markers in the Mojeño Trinitario dialect
    • 4.1-chicha
    • 4.2-samini
    • 4.3-gira
  • 5.The rise and fall of the diminutives
    • 5.1Inventory of the Mojenõ diminutives over time
    • 5.2The etymology of the diminutives
    • 5.3Distributional change in the diminutives
    • 5.4Functional change in the diminutives
    • 5.5Diachronic summary for each diminutive
    • 5.6Waves of diminutives: renewal cycles
  • 6.Summary of results
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 19 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00006.ros
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 1999. The Arawak language family. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 65–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laura. 1997. Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21(3). 533–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becerra Casanovas, Rogers. 1980. De ayer y de hoy. Diccionario del idioma mojeño a través del tiempo. Estudio comparativo sobre su evolución. La Paz: Proinsa.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth Aronson & Dan Isaac Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: a cross-linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Nancy E. 2003. The multiple functions of the definite article in Terena. Ms. Reprint Edition.Google Scholar
Butler, Nancy E. & Muriel Ekdahl. 2012. Aprenda Terena. Anápolis: SIL Brasil.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1999. Origine et évolution des diminutifs et augmentatifs dans quelques langues africaines. Silexicales 21, 29–35.Google Scholar
Danielsen, Swintha. 2007. Baure: An Arawak language of Bolivia (Indigenous Languages of Latin America 6). Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang & Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, Wayne. 1957. Trinitario grammar. San Lorenzo de Mojos: Misión Nuevas Tribus.Google Scholar
. 1993. Diccionario Trinitario-Castellano y Castellano-Trinitario. Ms. Reprint Edition.Google Scholar
Grandi, Nicola. 2011. Renewal and innovation in the emergence of Indo-European evaluative morphology. In Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavel Stekauer (eds.), Diminutives and augmentatives in the languages of the world, 61 vols. (Lexis), 5–25.Google Scholar
. 2015. The place of evaluation within morphology. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 75–90. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Grandi, Nicola & Lívia Körtvélyessy. 2015. Introduction: Why evaluative morphology? In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 3–20. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höller, Alfredo. 1932. Grammatik der Guarayo-Sprache. Hall in Tirol: Verlag der Missionsprokura der P.P. Franziskaner.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeSourd, Philip S. 1995. Diminutive verb forms in Passamaquoddy. International Journal of American Linguistics 61(1). 103–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marbán, Pedro. 1702. Arte de la lengua Moxa, con su Vocabulario, y Cathecismo. Lima: Imprenta Real de Joseph de Contreras.Google Scholar
Marcus, Inge. 1994. Classifiers in Terêna. Estudos Linguísticos XXIII(2). 912–9.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1992. The mother of all morphemes. Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. In Martha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds.), Papers from the first annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 293–349. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? (Dial Books for Young Readers). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mission, New Tribes. 2002. Eto ‘chojriicovo mue ‘ma viya [The New Testament]. Sanford: New Tribes Mission.Google Scholar
Mutz, Katrin. 2015. Evaluative morphology in a diachronic perspective. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 142–54. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Náñez Fernández, Emilio. 1973. El diminutivo: historia y funciones en el español clásico y moderno. Gredos.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Paul. 1985. Diminutives. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Olza Zubiri, Jesús, Conchita Nuni de Chapi & Juan Tube. 2002. Gramática Moja Ignaciana. Caracas: Universidad Católica Andres Bello.Google Scholar
Ott, Willis & Rebecca Ott. 1967. Ignaciano. In Esther Matteson (ed.), Bolivian Indian Grammars, vol. I1, 85–137. University of Oklahoma: SIL.Google Scholar
. 1983. Diccionario ignaciano y castellano, con apuntes gramáticales, 21 vols. Cochabamba: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2016. Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross-linguistic comparison. Morphology. 1–36.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1987. Some morphological elements of Maipuran Arawakan: Agreement affixes and the genitive construction. Language Sciences 9(1). 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 31, 355–499. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ponsonnet, Maïa. 2014. The language of emotions: The case of Dalabon (Australia). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. A preliminary typology of emotional connotations in morphological diminutives and augmentatives. In Maïa Ponsonnet & Marine Vuillermet (eds), Morphology and emotions across the world’s languages. Special issue of Studies in Language, 42(1).Google Scholar
Reynoso Noverón, Jeanett. 2005. Procesos de gramaticalización por subjetivización: el uso del diminutivo en español. In David Eddigton (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 79–86. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise. 2008. The word-prosodic system of Mojeño Trinitario and pervasive vowel deletion. Paper presented at A Estrutura de Línguas Amazônicas: Fonologia e Gramática II, Recife.
. 2010. Dialectes en danger: les derniers locuteurs du mojeño javeriano de Bolivie. In Colette Grinevald & Michel Bert (eds.), Faits de Langues, vol. 35–361, Linguistique de terrain sur langues en danger: locuteurs et linguistes, 255–64. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2011. Who is the third person ? Fluid transitivity in Mojeño Trinitario. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4), special issue on Argument-encoding systems in Bolivian Amazonian languages. 469–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. When vowel deletion blurs reduplication in Mojeño Trinitario. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in South-American languages (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7), 375–99. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Mojeño Trinitario. In Mily Crevels & Peter Muysken (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia, vol 3. Oriente, 59–97. La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
Saito, Akira. 2009. “Fighting against a hydra”: Jesuit Language Policy in Moxos. In Shinzo Kawamura & Cyril Veliath (eds.), Beyond the borders: Global perspective of Jesuit mission history, 350–63. Tokyo: Sophia University Press.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavel. 2015. Word-formation processes in evaluative morphology. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 43–60. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2008. How peculiar is evaluative morphology? Journal of Linguistics 29(01). 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth. 2010. Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1984. Diminutives and depreciatives: Semantic representation for derivational category. Quaderni di Semantica 51. 123–30.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krasnoukhova, Olga
2022. Attributive modification in South American indigenous languages. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 745 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.