Article published In:
Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages
Edited by Anetta Kopecka and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 45:1] 2021
► pp. 130171
Aurnague, Michel
2011‘Quittant tout, nous partîmes’: ‘quitter’ et ‘partir’ à la lumière des changements de relation locative. Journal of French Language Studies 21(3). 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Heike
2010Direction and Perspective in German Child Language. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 55–67. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix K. Ameka
2007Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3), 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe
1997On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. Proceedings of LP ’96: Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, proceedings of the conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996, 185–216.Google Scholar
De Knop, Sabine and Françoise Gallez
2013Manner of motion: A privileged dimension of German expressions. In Thomas Li (ed.), Compendium of cognitive linguistics research, 25–42. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert B.
2011The meaning of particle/prefix constructions in German. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The semantics of German verb prefixes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René & Marjolijn Verspoor
(eds.) 1998Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelen, Bernhard
1995Hinunter versus darunter. Beobachtungen und Überlegungen zu den Direktionaladverbien. In Ludwig M. Eichinger & Hans-Werner Eroms (eds.), Dependenz und Valenz, 243–258. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin, Jordan Zlatev, Anetta Kopecka, Masimo Cerruti & Johan Blomberg
2013The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, 364–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1987‘Source’ vs. ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline, Colette Grinevald & Anna Sörés
2011Pour une catégorie de “satellite” de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 38(2). 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki
2012The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: ‘Asymmetry of Source and Goal’ revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds). Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015A field method to describe spontaneous motion events in Japanese. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 411. 197–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
2006Trajectoire: Matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (CNRS / Université Lyon 2) – Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques, CNRS, France.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta
2010Motion events in Polish: lexicalization patterns and semantic distribution of Manner. In Viktoria Hasko & Renee Perellmuter (eds), New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, 225–246. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Semantic granularity in the expression of placement and removal events in Polish. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 327–347. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
2011L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But : perspective translinguistique. Les Cahiers de Faits de Langues 31. 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
This vol. Source-Goal (a)symmetry across languages: An Introduction. Studies in Language 43(3).
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
2005Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 961. 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Language and memory for motion events: origins of the asymmetry between goal and source path. Cognitive Science 36(3): 517–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehman, Christian
2002Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Second revised edition. Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt Nr. 9.Google Scholar
2018A typological approach of the encoding of motion events. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction, 45–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Jaume Mateu
2016Thinking for translating and intra-typological variation in satellite-framed languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 141(1). 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou, Corrien Blom, Geert Booij, Marion Elenbaas & Ans van Kemenenade
2012Morphosyntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Łozińska, Joanna
2018Path and manner saliency in Polish in contrast with Russian: A cognitive linguistic study. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdeling, Anke
2001On particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Anetta Kopecka, Melissa Bowerman, Marianne Gullberg & Asifa Majid
2012Putting and taking events: A cross-linguistic perspective, In Kopecka, Anetta and Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds), Events of putting and taking, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2008Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: The case of into vs. in. In Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 175–195. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Wolfgang
(dir.) 1993Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. 2nd edn. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Regier, Thierry & Mingyu Zheng
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 311. 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan Isaac, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Anetta Kopecka & Majid Asifa
2014Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics 251. 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2018The goal bias revised: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1). 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rodhe
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M.
2011Grammaticalization in spatial deixis: A case study. In Irmengard Rauch, Gerald F. Carr & Robert L. Kyes (eds), On Germanic linguistics: Issues and methods, 299–313. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994The grammar of space. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
1996An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie
2017The goal-over-source principle in European languages: Preliminary results from a parallel corpus study. In Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (Eds), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine & Anetta Kopecka
2019Trajectoire: a methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology. Special issue of Language, Documentation and Conservation 161. 97–124.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1983On the Compositionality of German Prefix Verbs. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 452–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar