Ameka, Felix K. & Stephan C. Levinson. 2007. Introduction – The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5). 847–872.
Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.
Aurnague, Michel. 2015. Motion verbs and spatial PPs in French: from spatio-temporal structure to asymmetry and goal bias. Carnet de Grammaire, noº23. Rapports internes de CLLE-ERSS.
Aurnague, Michel. 2019. About asymmetry of motion in French: Some properties and a principle. In Michael Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 31–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Backhouse, Anthony E.1981. Japanese verbs for dress. Journal of Linguistics 171. 17–29.
Blake, Barry J.1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532.
Borillo, Andrée. 1998. L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In Bohumil Palek, Osamu Fujimura & Jiří Václav Neustupný (eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, item orderings and universals. (Proceedings of the Conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996), 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.
Bowerman, Melissa, Marianne Gullberg, Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2004. Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field manual, Vol. 91, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Burrow, Trigant & Sudhibhushan Bhattacharya. 1970. The Pengo language: Grammar, texts, and vocabulary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Clancy, Patricia M.1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dromi, Esther. 1979. More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: An analysis of Hebrew data. Journal of Child Language 61. 547–562.
Fagard, Benjamin. 2006. Evolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes: Illustration ou contre-exemple de la primauté du spatiale. Paris: Université Paris 7. PhD dissertation.
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1993. Kurze Grammatik der Georgian Sprache. 3rd ed. Leipzig: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopedie.
Fillmore, Charles J.1972. How to know whether you’re coming or going. In Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971, Referate des 6. Linguistischen Kolloquiums (11–14August 1971, Kopenhagen), 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Fillmore, Charles J.1975. Santa Cruz lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Fillmore, Charles J.1977. The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant. 2011. L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : Vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 31. 71–98.
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant. 2016. On the morpho-syntax of path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(3). 341–374.
Fortis, Jean-Michel, Colette Grinevald, Anetta Kopecka & Alice Vittrant. 2011. L’expression de la trajectoire: Perspectives typologiques. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 3(2). 33–41.
Fowles, John. 1969. The French lieutenant’s woman. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Fowles, John. 1981. La mujer del teniente francés. Barcelona: Editorial Argos Vergara.
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris G. & Jacqueline A. Stedmon. 1981. The allative bias in three-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2). 283–296.
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Athina Sioupi. 2015. Framing the difference between Sources and Goals in Change of Possession events: A corpus-based study in German and Modern Greek. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 105–122.
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1979. ‘Goal’ over ‘source’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. Hungarian Studies in English 121. 139–157.
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1982. Source vs. Goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Robert N. St. Clair and Walburga von Raffler-Engel (eds.), Language and cognitive styles: Patterns of neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic development, 292–308. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1987. ‘Source’ and ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Ishibashi, Miyuki. 2010. The (a)symmetry of Source and Goal in Motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In Giovanna Marotta, Alessandro Lenci, Linda Meini & Francesco Rovai (eds), Space in language, Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Firenze: Edizioni ETS.
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet. 2006. Trajectoire : matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. [URL] (last access 11 December 2020).
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Johanson, Megan, Selemis Stathis & Anna Papafragou. 2019. The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: Language-general vs. language-specific aspects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34 (7). 826–840.
Jones, Michael A.1983. Speculations on the expression of movement in French. Language Center Occasional Papers (University of Essex) 271. 165–194.
Kabata, Kaori. 2013. Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 361: 78–89.
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi. 2010. Source-Goal (a)symétrie – Guide de travail. Projet Trajectoire, CNRS-TUL (unpublished ms.).
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi. 2011. L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: Perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 3(2). 131–149.
Kutscher, Silvia. 2010. When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: the case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen variety of Laz (South-Caucasian). STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63(3). 252–271.
Lakoff, Georges. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 961. 1–33.
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2012. Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between goal and source path. Cognitive Science 36(3). 517–544.
Lakusta, Laura & Susan Carey. 2015. Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development 11(2). 152–175.
Levinson, Stephen C.1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds.), Language and space, 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.2003. Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 1999. Hypotheses concerning basic locative constructions and the verbal elements within them. In David Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 55–56. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Levinson, Stephen C. & Penelope Brown. 2012. Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 273–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, Stephen C. & David. P. Wilkins. 2006. The background to the study of the language of space. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacKenzie, J. Lachlan. 1978. Ablative–locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14(2). 129–156.
McCawley, James D.1978. Notes on Japanese clothing verbs. In John Hinds & Irwin Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, 68–78. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Nam, Seungho. 2004. Goal and Source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Seoul National University. Unpublished manuscript.
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2009. Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47(5). 1113–41.
Noonan, Michael. 2008. Case compounding in the Bodic languages. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations, Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pajusalu, Renate, Neeme Kahusk, Heili Orav, Ann Veismann, Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim. 2013. The encoding of motion event in Estonian. In Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, 44–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals and sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081.
Papafragou, Anna. 2010. Source-Goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science 341: 1064–1092.
Papahagi, Cristiana. 2005. Les prépositions de la trajectoire en français et en roumain: Étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Université Paris 3. PhD dissertation.
Pléh, Csaba. 1998. Early spatial case markers in Hungarian children. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 211–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pléh, Csaba, Zsuzsanna Vinkler & László Kálmán. 1996. Early morphology of spatial express-ions in Hungarian children: A childes study. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 401. 129–142.
Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng. 2007. Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 311. 705–719.
Ricca, Davide. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata. 2007. Crosslingusitic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514.
Richardson, John F.1984. On some though Source-Goal asymmetries. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference in Linguistics 11 (CESCOL Proceedings). 275–287.
Sapir, Edward, Morris Swadesh & Alice Morris. 1932. The expression of the ending-point relation in English, French, and German. Language 8(1), Language Monograph 10.
Sarda, Laure. 2019. French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sinha, Chris, Lis A. Thorseng, Mariko Hayashi & Kim Plunkett. 1994. Comparative spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics 11(4). 253–287.
Slobin, I. Dan. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in language function and language type, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, I. Dan. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Topological & contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
Slobin, I. Dan. 2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit Diskin Ravid & Havat Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2018. The goal bias revised: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1).143–166.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rodhe. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Talmy, Len. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, Len. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Talmy, Len. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Taremaa, Piia. 2013. Fictive and actual motion in Estonian: Encoding space. SKY Journal of Linguistics 261. 151–183.
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Günter Radden. 1999. Putting concepts together: Syntax. In René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vittrant, Alice. 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian Languages. In Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), Southeast Asia: The state of arts, 586–632. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Vuillermet, Marine & Anetta Kopecka. 2019. “Trajectoire”: A methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. In Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology, 97–124. Special issue of Language, Documentation and Conservation 161.
Wälchli, Bernhard & Fernando Zúñiga. 2009. Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 59(3). 284–303.
Wilkins, David P. & Deborah Hill. 1995. When go means come: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3). 209–259.
2024. Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 191 ff.
Soroli, Efstathia
2024. How language influences spatial thinking, categorization of motion events, and gaze behavior: a cross-linguistic comparison. Language and Cognition► pp. 1 ff.
Taremaa, Piia, Johanna Kiik, Leena Karin Toots & Ann Veismann
2024. Speed as a dimension of manner in Estonian frog stories. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 224 ff.
2023. Speed and space: semantic asymmetries in motion descriptions in Estonian. Cognitive Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels
2023. From Motion to Causation: The Diachrony of the Spanish Causative Constructions with traer (‘Bring’) and llevar (‘Take’). Languages 8:2 ► pp. 122 ff.
Hellwig, Birgit, Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Melanie Schippling
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.