Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 10:1 (1986) ► pp.151166
References
Comrie, B.
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1978Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Downing, B. T.
1978 “Some Universals of Relative Clause Structure”, in J. H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language. Volume 4. Syntax. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 375–418.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L.
1976 “The adjoined relative clause in Australia”, in R. M. W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institue of Aboriginal Studies. 78–105.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von
1836Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechtes. Berlin: Königl. Akad. d. Wiss.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1924The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie
1977 “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry 81.63–99.Google Scholar
1979 “Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy”, Language 551.333–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
1979Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
1983a “Rektion und syntaktische Relationen”, Folia Linguistica XVII1.339–378.Google Scholar
1983b “The Present State of Linguistic Typology”, In S. Hattori & K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo. 950–956.Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. & B. Blake
1981Language Typology. Cross-linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Seiler, H.
1960Relativsatz, Attribut und Apposition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1978 “The Cologne project on language universals: Questions, objectives, and prospects”, in H. Seiler (ed.) Language Universals. Tübingen: Narr. 11–25.Google Scholar
Tobler, A.
1896 “Relativsatz als prädikative Bestimmung”, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 201.55–58.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, J.
1984 “ That COMP-fusions”, in C. Brugmann & M. Macaulay (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. 660–673.Google Scholar
1985a “Relative that – a centennial dispute”, Journal of Linguistics 11. 149–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985b “The predicative relatives of French perception verbs”. In A. M. Bolkestein. e.a. (eds.) Predicates and terms in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht & Cinnaminson: Foris. 219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar