Book review
Julia Horvath. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris, 1985. 241 pp.
References (39)
References
Abraham, W.; and De Mey, S. (eds). 1986. Topic, focus and configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackerman, F. 1984. “Verbal modifiers as argument taking predicates: complex verbs as predicate complexes in Hungarian.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 251:23–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aoun, J.; and Sportiche, D. 1983. “On the formal theory of government.” Linguistic Review 21:211–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A.; and Rizzi, L. 1982. “On the syntax of ne: some theoretical implications.” Linguistic Review 11:117–155.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, H.; and Beukema, F. (eds). 1985. Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. 1976. “Conditions on rules of grammar.” Linguistic Analysis 21:303–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farmer, A. 1980. “On the interaction of morphology and syntax.” MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gil, D. 1987. “Definiteness, noun phrase-configurationality, and the countmass distinction.” In: ter Meulen and Reuland (eds) 1987:325–352.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K. 1980. “Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: comments on the papers on Japanese syntax.” In: Otsu and Farmer (eds) 1980:85–199.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K. 1981. On the position of Warlpiri in a typology of the base. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K. 1982. “Preliminary remarks on configurationality.” New England Linguistic Society XII1: 86–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K. 1983. “Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 5–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horvath, J. 1981. “Aspects of Hungarian syntax and the theory of grammar”. UCLA dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunyadi, L. 1981. “The expression of linguistic polarity in Hungarian” (in Hungarian). PhD. Dissertation, University of Debrecen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunyadi, L. 1984. “The expression of logical scope in Hungarian.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 241:1–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenesei, I. 1984. “On what really figures in a non-configurational language.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 241:28–54.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenesei, I. 1986. “On the logic of word order in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and De Mey (eds). 1986:143–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. 1981a. “Structural relations in Hungarian, a ‘free’ word order language.” Linguistic Inquiry 121:185–213.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. 1981b. “Topic and Focus: the operators of the Hungarian sentence.” Folia Linguistica XV (3–4):306–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. 1982. “Subject-object symmetries”. Ms. University of Budapest.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. 1984. “The order and scope of operators in the Hungarian sentence.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 241:82–126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. 1985. “Is the VP universal?” Ms. University of Budapest.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, R. 1980. “On the organization of the lexicon”. MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marácz, L. K. 1984. “On the grammar of the PP in Hungarian”. Groningen M.A. Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marácz, L. K. 1985. “Some notes on Weak Crossover in Hungarian.” In: Bennis and Beukema (eds). 1985:129–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marácz, L. K. 1986. “Dressed or naked: the case of the Hungarian PP.” In: Abraham and De Mey (eds). 1986:227–52.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marácz, L. K. 1986. “On Coreferential and Bound Variable Interpretation in Non Configurational Languages.” Theoretical Linguistic Research 2(2):85–172.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, A. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
May, R. 1986. Logical Form: its structure and derivation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ter Meulen, A. and Reuland, E. (eds). 1987. The representation of indefiniteness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Otsu, Y. and Farmer, A. (eds). 1980. MIT working papers in linguistics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saito, M. 1985. “Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications”. MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saito, M. and H. Hoji. 1983. “Weak Crossover and move alpha in Japanese.” New England Linguistic Society 11:245–259.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stowell, T. 1981. “Origins of phrase structure.” MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, A. 1981. “The possessive construction in Hungarian: a configurational category in a non-configurational language.” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 311:216–289.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, A. 1983. “Focussing properties, or the trap of first order.” Theoretical Linguistics 2(3): 125–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, A. 1984. “The possessor that ran away from home.” Linguistic Review 31:89–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)