Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 12:2 (1988) ► pp.425456
References (29)
References
Chomsky, N. 1970. “Remarks on nominalization”. In: R. A. Jacobs; and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds). 1970: 184–221.Google Scholar
1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982, Some concepts and consequences…, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S.; and J. D. Fodor. “How can grammar help parsers”? In: Dowty et al. (eds), 1985: 94–127.Google Scholar
Culy, C. 1985. “The complexity of the vocabulary of Bambara”. Linguistics and Philosophy 8(3): 345–353.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1982. “Grammatical relations and montague grammar”. In: P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds). 1982: 79–130.Google Scholar
1985. “On recent analyses of the semantics of control”. Linguistics and Philosophy 81:291–331.Google Scholar
Dowty, D.; et al. (eds). 1985. Natural language processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1983. “Phrase structure parsing and the island constraints”. Linguistics and Philosophy 61:163–223.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. 1981. “On syntactic categories”. Phil. Trans, of the Royal Society of London B 2951:267–283.Google Scholar
1982. “Phrase structure grammar”. In: P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds), 1982: 131–186.Google Scholar
(ed.), 1985. “Computational tools for doing linguistics”. Special issue of Linguistics, Linguistics 23:2.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.; and G. K. Pullum. 1982. GPSG: A theoretical synopsis. Bloomington: Indiana Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.; Klein, G.; and Pullum, G. K. (eds). 1983. Order, concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. A.; and Rosenbaum, P. S. 1970. Reading in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P.; and Pullum, G. K. (eds). 1982. The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1983. “When Meta-rules are not meta-rules”. In: Sparck Jones, K.; and Wilks, Y. (eds). 1983: 94–116.Google Scholar
Peters, S. P.; and H. Uszkoreit. 1986. “On some formal properties of metarules”. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(4):477–494 (revised version of: Peters, S. P.; and Uszkoreit. 1982. “Essential variables in meta-rules”.Google Scholar
Pollard, C. J. 1984. Generalized phrase structure grammars, head grammars and natural languages. PhD Diss. Stanford.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. 1984. “Chomsky on the enterprise”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21:349–355.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K.; and G. Gazdar. 1982. “Natural languages and context-free languages”. Linguistics and Philosophy 41:471–504.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT Diss.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M.; and A. Zwicky. 1985. “A note on xy languages”. Linguistics and Philosophy 81:229–236.Google Scholar
Sells, P. 1985. Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Shieber, S. 1984. “Direct parsing of ID/LP grammars”. Linguistics and Philosophy 71:135–154.Google Scholar
1985. “Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language”. Linguistics and Philosophy 8(3): 333–345.Google Scholar
1986. An introduction to unification-based grammars. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sparck Jones, K.; and Wilks, G. (eds). 1983. Automatic natural language parsing. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd.Google Scholar
Uszkoreit, H. 1987. Word order and constituent structure in German. Stanford = CSLI (also PhD, Austin, Texas 1984)Google Scholar