Katalin É. Kiss. Configurationality in syntax. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo: Reidel, 1987. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiado, 1987. 268 pp. $ 69.00

Reviewed by

Edith A. Moravcsik | University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Published online: 1 January 1990

References (14)

References

Abraham, Werner; and de Meij, Sjaak (eds). 1986. Topic, focus, and configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistik Aktuell 41].

Cole, Peter; and Sadock, Jerrold M. (eds). 1977. Grammatical relations. New York, San Francisco: Academic Press [Syntax and Semantics 81].

Farkas, Donka F.; and Sadock, Jerrold M. 1989. “Preverb climbing in Hungarian.” Language 65(2):318–338.

Horvath, Julia. 1981. Aspects of Hungarian syntax and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

. 1985. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

. 1986. “Remarks on the configurationality issue.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986. 65–87.

Hunyadi, László. 1986. “The expression of logical scope in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 89–102.

Kenesei, István. 1986. “On the logic of word order in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 143–159.

É. Kiss, Katalin. 1986. “The order and scope of operators in the Hungarian sentence.” In: Abraham and de Meij (eds) 1986: 181–214.

Li, Charles N.; and Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. “Subject and topic: A new typology of language.” In: Li (ed.) 1976: 457–489.

Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1984. “The place of direct objects among the noun phrase constituents of Hungarian.” In: Plank (ed.) 1984: 55–85.

Plank, Frans. (ed.). 1984. Objects. Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.

Schachter, Paul. 1977. “Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects.” In: Cole and Sadock (ed.) 1977: 279–306.