Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 14:2 (1990) ► pp.433–478
Book review

R. T. Oehrle, E. Bach & D. Wheeler (eds). Categorial Grammars and natural language structures. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1988. 524 pp. [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 32].

Reviewed by
 | Konstanz
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.10ste
References (40)
References
Ajdukiewicz, K. 1935. “Die syntaktische Konnexität.” Studia Philosophica 11: 207–231.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.; and Jones, Ch. (eds). 1974. Historical linguistics II1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M.; and Oehrle, R. T. (eds). 1984. Language and sound structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bach, E.; and Partee, B. H. 1980. “Anaphora and semantic structure.” In: Kreiman & A. E. Ojeda (eds) 1980: 1–28.Google Scholar
Baker, M. Ch. 1988. Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Morphological and syntactic objects: a review of Di Sciullo and Williams’ On the definition of word .” Yearbook of Morphology: 259–83.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. 1964. Language and Information. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y.; Gaifman, C. and Shamir, E. 1960. “On categorial and phrase structure grammars.” The Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, F91: 1–16.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. et al. (eds). 1988. Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. 1983. Quantification and syntactic theory. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. 1973. Logics and languages. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
Di Sciullo, A. M. and Williams, E. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fabb, N. 1984. Syntactic affixation. MIT Dissertation.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.; Klein, E.; Pullum, G., and Sag, I. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammars. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1972. “A Program for Syntax.” In: Davidson and Harman (eds.): 483–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flickinger, D. et al. (Hrsg.). 1982. Proceedings of the 1982 Wet Coast conference on formal linguistics. Stanford University: Dept. of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.; and van Riemsdijk, H. 1986. “Verb projection raising, scope and the typology of verb movement rules.” Linguistic Inquiry 17.3: 417–66.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. 1984. “The phonetics and phonology of Russian voicing assimilation.” In: Aronoff and Oehrle (eds) 1984: 318–328.Google Scholar
Höhle, T. 1982. “Über Komposition und Derivation: Zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 11: 76–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, A. 1980. A relational grammar of kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kreiman, K. J.; and Ojeda, A. E. (eds). 1980. Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lambek, J. 1958. “The Mathematics of Sentence Structure.” American Math. Monthly LXV1: 154–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1972. General semantics. Synthese: Vol. 221: 18–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montague, R. 1974. “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.” In: Thomason (ed.) 1974: 247–270.Google Scholar
1974. “Universal Grammar.” In: Thomason (ed.) 1974: 222–246.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 1985. “Morphology and logical form.” Linguistic Inquiry 161: 193–246.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. “Variables explained away.” In: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1041: 343–47.Google Scholar
Rooth, M.; and Partee, B. 1982. Conjunction, type ambiguity, and wide scope of Or .” In: Flickinger et al. (Hrsg.). 1982: 353–362.Google Scholar
Schönfinkel, M. 1924. “Über die Bausteine der mathematischen Logik.” Mathematische Annalen 921: 305–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stechow, A. von. 1989. “Syntax und Semantik.” Arbeitspapiere der Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft 11. Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. 1987. “Bound variables in syntax (are there any?).” In: Bartsch et al. (eds) 1987.Google Scholar
Thomason, R. H. (ed.). 1974. Formal philosophy. Selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Venneman, Th. 1974. “Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX.” In: Anderson and Jones (eds) 1974: 339–376.Google Scholar
Williams, E. 1981b. “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.” Linguistic Inquiry 121: 245–74.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Steedman, Mark
1993. Categorial grammar. Lingua 90:3 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.