Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp.585–627

Syntactic and semantic agreement in Eegimaa (Banjal)

An account of lexical hybrids in an African noun class system

| University of York
Typological research on agreement systems recognises syntactic and semantic agreement as the two main types of agreement, with the former considered to be more canonical. An examination of different manifestations of semantic agreement found in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa
noun class (non sex based gender) system is proposed in this paper from the perspective of Canonical Typology, and the findings are related to the Agreement Hierarchy predictions. The results show that Eegimaa has hybrid nouns and constructional mismatches which trigger semantically based agreement mismatches, both in gender and number between controller nouns and certain targets. This paper shows that Eegimaa has two main subtypes of semantic agreement: human semantic agreement and locative semantic agreement. The data and the analysis proposed here reveal novel results according to which these two types of semantic agreement behave differently in relation to the Agreement Hierarchy.
Keywords: agreement mismatches, noun class, canonical typology, Jóola, Atlantic, Niger-Congo
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Definition of terms
    • 2.1A working definition of agreement
    • 2.2Canonical typology
  • 3.Summary of the Eegimaa noun class system
    • 3.1The noun class system
    • 3.2Syntactic agreement in Eegimaa
  • 4.Hybrid nouns in Eegimaa
    • 4.1Lexical hybrids
      • 4.1.1One full lexical hybrid
      • 4.1.2Hybrids in the plural only
    • 4.2Genre-specific mismatches: Proverbs, songs and generic propositions
  • 5.Constructional mismatches
    • 5.1Locatives in Eegimaa
    • 5.2Human collectivity nouns
    • 5.3Pure location nouns
      • 5.3.1Pure location nouns describing human collectivities
      • 5.3.2Pure location nouns with no human referents
      • 5.3.3Agreement with nouns denoting containers
      • 5.3.4Time location nouns
    • 5.4Conjoined noun phrases
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14023.sag
References (40)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers : A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bassène, Alain-Christian. 2015. Accords de classe et référence générique dans les parlers joola. In Denis Creissels & Konstantin Podzniakov (eds.), Typologie des systèmes de classes nominales dans les langues Atlantiques. Cologne: RüdigerKöppeVerlag.Google Scholar
Bassène, Alain Chistian. 2012. Concurrence entre critères morphologiques et critères sémantiques dans les accords de classe: le cas du jóola banjal. Africana Linguistica 181. 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd ed., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobbinah, Alexander Yao. 2013. Nominal classification and verbal nouns in Baïnounk Gubëeher. London: SOAS, University of London, Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1979. The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15(2). Cambridge University Press. 203–224.Google Scholar
1983. Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Gender and noun classes. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Linguistic typology and syntactic description. Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd ed., 241–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a. Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3(2). 141–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b. Features: essential notions. In A. Kibort & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Features: perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, 141–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Sex-based and Non-sex-based Gender Systems. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 31. [URL]. Accessed on 2013-06-05.
2015. Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 191–214. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1999. “Genres” indo-européens et “classes nominales” Niger-Congo. Faits de Langues 141. Paris: OPHRYS. 177–184.Google Scholar
. 2013. Atlantic noun-class systems: a typological approach. Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory 41. London.Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garbo, Francesca Di. 2014. Gender and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and intergenealogical survey of Africa. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How do languages acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & A. Moravcsik Edith (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 31, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Martin Haspelmath & Dik Bakker (eds.), Languages across boundaries, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. In Hansjakob Seiler & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenstanden, vol. 11. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. 2006. The committee has/have decided…: on concord patterns with collective nouns in inner- and outer-circle varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3). 206–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Magnus. 2001. Agreement with collective nouns in English (Lund Studies in English). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
. 2006. Collective nouns and language change. English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 321–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.Google Scholar
Pozdniakov, Konstantin. 2010. La classification nominale : A la croisée des paradigmes. In Franck Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, 87–105. ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleonor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleonor Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27–48. Hillsdate, Mich: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sagna, Serge. 2008. Formal and semantic properties of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa (A.k.a Banjal) nominal classification system. London: SOAS, University of London Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2010. Issues in noun classification and noun class assignment in Gújjolaay Eegimaa (Banjal) and other Jóola languages. Studies in African Linguistics 39(1). 1–33.Google Scholar
. 2011. Semantic categorisations in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa collectives and distributives. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Richards-Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 31, 1–10. London: Department of Linguistics, SOAS.Google Scholar
. 2012. Physical properties and culture-specific factors as principles of semantic categorisation in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa noun class system. Cognitive Linguistics 23 (1). 129–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo. 2001. Number in Swahili grammar. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 681(Swahili forum VIII). 7–16.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2010. Nominal Classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(8). 719–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steele, Susan. 1978. Word order variation: a typological study. In J. H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language IV: Syntax, 585–623. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization. Oxford textbooks in linguistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Rachel. 2015. Kujireray: morphosyntax, noun classification and verbal nouns. London: SOAS, University of London Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Welmers, W E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley (USA); London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Paul Polydoor de. 1971. The noun class system of Proto-Benue-Congo. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Corbett, Greville G.
2022. Splits, internal and external, as a window into the nature of features. Morphology 32:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2023. The Agreement Hierarchy and (generalized) semantic agreement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
G. Corbett, Greville
2022. The Agreement Hierarchy revisited: The typology of controllers. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Sagna, Serge, Virve‑Anneli Vihman, Marilyn Vihman & Dunstan Brown
2022. The acquisition of demonstratives in a complex noun class system. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.