Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 16:1 (1992) ► pp.240–248
Book review

Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.). Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988. xix 4- 573 pp. [Typological Studies in Language, 12].

Reviewed by
| Free University of Berlin
Published online: 1 January 1992
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16.1.17has
References (24)
References
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. “Aspect and voice: some reflections on perfect and passive”. In: Tedeschi and Zaenen (eds) 1981: 65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1990. “A functional typology of antipassives”. Paper presented at the Symposium on Voice, Santa Barbara, March 1990.
Culicover, Peter W.; Wasow, Thomas; and Akmajian, Adrian (eds). 1977. Formal syntax. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1989. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. 2. Auflage. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forest, Robert. 1984. “Entre le lexique et la syntaxe: Réflexions sur les énoncés résultatifs de l’allemand”. La linguistique 201: 49–67.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln [Arbeitspapiere, Neue Folge 51].Google Scholar
. Forthcoming a. “Passive participles across languages”. To appear in: Fox, Barbarra; and Hopper, Paul (eds). Voice: Form and function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. Forthcoming b. “From resultative to perfect in Ancient Greek”. To appear in Función (Guadalajara).
Helbig, Gerhard; and Kempter, Fritz. 1973. Das Zustandspassiv. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. “Small clause results”. Lingua 741: 101–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1827. “Ueber den Dualis”. In: Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1903–1936. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Leitzmann et al.Google Scholar
. 1903–1936. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by Albert Leitzmann et al. 171 vols. Berlin. (Reprint: de Gruyter, 1968).Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.). 1983. Tipologija rezulťtativnyx konstrukci] (rezul’tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir; Otaina, Galina A.; and Xolodovič, Aleksandr A. 1974. “Diatezy i zalogi v nivxskom jazyke”. In: Xolodovič (ed.) 1974: 232–251.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. (ed.). 1990. Amazonian linguistics: studies in lowland South American languages. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1990. “Transitivity and ergativity in Panare”. In: Payne, Doris L. (ed.) 1990: 429–453.Google Scholar
Reissner, E. (ed.). 1982. Literatur und Sprachentwicklung in Osteuropa im 20. Jahrhundert. Ausgewählte Beiträge zum 2. Weltkongress für Sowjetund Osteuropastudien. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, Philip J.; and Zaenen, Annie (eds). 1981. Tense and aspect. New York etc.: Academic Press [Syntax & Semantics 141]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Daniel. 1982. “Deutsch-polnische Lehnbeziehungen im Bereich der Passivbildung”. In: Reissner (ed.) 1982: 189–210.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1977. “Transformations and the lexicon”. In: Culicover; Wasow; and Akmajian (eds) 1977: 327–360.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. “A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality”. Studies in Language 121: 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xolodovič, Aleksandr A. (ed.). 1974. Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij: diatezy i zalogi. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1974. Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij: diatezy i zalogi. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
1979. Problemy grammatičeskoj teorii. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar