Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp.231–269

Plural marking patterns of nouns and their associates in the world’s languages

| University of Leipzig
Plural marking reaches most corners of languages. When a noun occurs with another linguistic element, which is called associate in this paper, plural marking on the two-component structure has four logically possible patterns: doubly unmarked, noun-marked, associate-marked and doubly marked. These four patterns do not distribute homogeneously in the world’s languages, because they are motivated by two competing motivations iconicity and economy. Some patterns are preferred over others, and this preference is consistently found in languages across the world. In other words, there exists a universal distribution of the four plural marking patterns. Furthermore, holding the view that plural marking on associates expresses plurality of nouns, I propose a hypothetical universal which uses the number of pluralized associates to predict plural marking on nouns. A data set collected from a sample of 100 languages is used to test the hypothetical universal, by employing the machine learning algorithm logistic regression.
Keywords: plural marking, competing motivations, hypothetical universal testing, logistic regression
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sampling methods
  • 3.Data coding
  • 4.Motivations of four plural marking patterns
  • 5.Structures
    • 5.1Adnominal relations
      • 5.1.1Nouns and definite articles
      • 5.1.2Nouns and adnominal demonstratives
      • 5.1.3Nouns and adnominal adjectives
      • 5.1.4Nouns and adnominal numerals
      • 5.1.5Nouns and adnominal interrogatives
      • 5.1.6Noun and other adnominal expressions
    • 5.2Nouns and predicates
      • 5.2.1Two types of plural-expressing elements on predicates
      • 5.2.2The range of predicates
      • 5.2.3Distribution of plural marking patterns of nouns and predicates
    • 5.3Nouns and adnominal possessors
    • 5.4Nouns and other types of associates
  • 6.The universal distribution of plural marking patterns
  • 7.Hypothesis-driven universal testing
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16001.che
References (50)
References
Andrews, Kenneth Ralph. 1994. Shawnee Grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Antunes de Araujo, Gabriel. 2004. A Grammar of Sabanê: A Nambikwaran Language. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Phd dissertation.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan, Edith Moravcsik & Leon Stassen. 1999. Parts of speech: A challenge for typology. Linguistic Typology 1(2). 167–184.Google Scholar
Bryant, Michael G. 1999. Aspects of Tirmaga Grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan MA dissertation.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne. 1993. The So Language, vol. 21 (Afrikanistische Monografien (AMO). Köln: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corris, Miriam. 2005. A grammar of Barupu, a language of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Courtz, Henk. 2008. A Carib Grammar and Dictionary. Toronto: Magoria Books.Google Scholar
Cunha de Oliveira, Christiane. 2005. The Language of the Apinajé People of Central Brazil. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy. 1997. A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of southwestern Colombia. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dondorp, Anne & Jae-Wook Shim. 2013 [1997]. Wipi Grammar Essentials. SIL-PNG Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Definite Articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Gabas, Jr., Nilson. 1999. A Grammar of Karo, Tupí (Brazil). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas M. 1999. A Lexicographic Study of Ulwa. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2008. A grammar of Cavineña Mouton grammar library. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and Economic Motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarstrom, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank (eds.). 2016. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark. 2001. A Grammar of Limilngan: A Language of the Mary River region Northern Territory Australia, vol.5161 (Pacific Linguistics). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. A Grammar of Movima. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hellenthal, Anneke Christine. 2010. A grammar of Sheko. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 2004. Mochica, vol. 4331 (Languages of the World/Materials). München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I. & Jon Ortiz de Urbana. 2003. A Grammar of Basque, vol. 261 (Mouton Grammar Library). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Joana Worth. 2010. A grammar of Yakima Ichishkíin/Sahaptin. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Jendraschek, Gerd. 2012. A grammar of Iatmul. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg Fakultät für Sprach-, Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaften Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar
Kumar, Pramod. 2012. Descriptive and typological study of Jarawa. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lantz, Brett. 2015. Machine Learning with R. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Marlett, Stephen A. 1981. The Structure of Seri. San Diego: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Dik Bakker & Antti Arppe. 2016. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 233–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murane, Elizabeth. 1974. Daga Grammar: From Morpheme to Discourse, vol. 431. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Publications in Linguistics. The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington microfiche ed. edn.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar. Language 62(1). 56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki. 1994. A Grammar of Motuna (Bougainville, Papua New Guinea). Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon. 2007. A Grammar of Aguaruna. Melbourne: LaTrobe University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Savà, Graziano & Mauro Tosco. 2000. A Sketch of Ongota: A Dying Language of Southwestern Ethiopia. Studies in African Linguistics 29(2). 59–135.Google Scholar
Seyoum, Mulugeta. 2008. A Grammar of Dime. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas Cedric. 1974. The Plurality Split. Chicago Linguistic Society 101. 657–661.Google Scholar
van Staden, Miriam. 2000. Tidore: A Linguistic Description of a Language of the North Moluccas. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Stirtz, Timothy. 2012. A grammar of Gaahmg, a Nilo-Saharan language of Sudan. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne. 2004. Musqueam Reference Grammar First Nations Languages. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 1999. Lavvkaleve: A Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Turner, Katherine. 1987. Aspects of Salinan Grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Underriner, Janne L. 2002. Intonation and Syntax in Klamath. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Erik. 2006. A Grammar of Yuraharé. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Watters, David E. 2006. Notes on Kusunda Grammar: A Language Isolate of Nepal, vol. 31. (Himalayan Linguistics Archive). National Foundation for the Development of Indigenous Nationalities.Google Scholar
Wegener, Claudia U. 2008. A grammar of Savosavo, A Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Wageningen: Wageningen University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Joshua Karl. 2014. A grammar of Pite Saami. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshioka, Noboru. 2012. A Reference Grammar of Eastern Burushaski. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Zamponi, Raoul. 2003. Betoi. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar