Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp.466473
References (24)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2006. Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In: Kulikov, Leonid, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Studies on case, valency and transitivity, 115–146. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobalijk, Jonathan. 2008. Where’s Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In David Adger, Daniel Harbour & Susanna Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Urigereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, ed., 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary and Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen, and Andrej Malchukov. 2008. Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 391. 565–587 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2010. Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 341. 239–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie. 2008. Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 39.11. 55–101 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Theodore & Omer Preminger. 2015. Case in Sakha: are two modalities really necessary? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 331. 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik (eds.). 2014. Competing motivations in grammar and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Andrew Spencer (eds.). 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 1181, 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Towards a typology of split ergativity: A TAM hierarchy for alignment splits. In Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Andrej Malchukov and Marc Richards (eds.), Scales and Hierarchies: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, 275–297. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL ‘91, 175–195. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2010. Case. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, 52–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker. 2009. Case and alternative strategies: word order and agreement marking. In: Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 549–562. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2008. Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, and Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. Studies in Language Companion Series 941, 67–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar