Review published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp.474–486
Book review
Baker, Mark. 2015. Case
Reviewed by
References (26)
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. 
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 593–642.
Baker, Mark C. & William Croft. 2017. Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics, 31, pp. 179–197.
Barker, Chris. 2012. Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 614–633.
Bresnan, Joan, Shipra Dingare & Christopher D. Manning. 2001. Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In Butt, Miriam & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845.
Handschuh, Corinna. 2014. A typology of marked-S languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. [Studies in Diversity Linguistics 1].
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 21. ([URL])
. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21.
. 2007. Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment. Functions of Language 14(1). 79–102.
. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.
. 2014. Comparative syntax. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Dan Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 490–508. London: Routledge.
Heine, Bernd & Christa König. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32(1). 87–131.
Klaiman, M. H. 1992. Inverse languages. Lingua 881. 227–261.
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press ([URL]).
Malchukov, Andrej. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 1181. 203–221.
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McGregor, William B. 2010. Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120(7). 1610–1636.
Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito. 2007. Re-constructing semantic maps: The comitative-instrumental area. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4). 273–292.
Perlmutter, David M. 1980. Relational grammar. In Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Current approaches to syntax, 195–229. New York: Academic Press [Syntax and Semantics 13].
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Stiebels, Barbara. 2015. Control. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax: Theory and analysis, vol. 11, 412–446. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK), 42].
van Lier, Eva. 2012. Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). 1–16.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Anouba, Acha Arnaud & Huang Dechun
2023. Risk-Taking and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intention in Côte d’Ivoire SMEs: Moderating Role of Government Subsidy policy. International Journal of Science and Business ► pp. 126 ff. 
Haspelmath, Martin
2019. Ergativity and depth of analysis. Rhema :4, 2019 ► pp. 108 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2021. Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.