Book review
Baker, Mark. 2015. Case
References (26)
References
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483.
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 593–642.
Baker, Mark C. & William Croft. 2017. Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics, 31, pp. 179–197.
Barker, Chris. 2012. Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 614–633.
Bresnan, Joan, Shipra Dingare & Christopher D. Manning. 2001. Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In Butt, Miriam & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845.
Handschuh, Corinna. 2014. A typology of marked-S languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. [Studies in Diversity Linguistics 1].
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 21. ([URL])
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2014. Comparative syntax. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Dan Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 490–508. London: Routledge.
Heine, Bernd & Christa König. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32(1). 87–131.
Klaiman, M. H. 1992. Inverse languages. Lingua 881. 227–261.
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press ([URL]).
Malchukov, Andrej. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 1181. 203–221.
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McGregor, William B. 2010. Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120(7). 1610–1636.
Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito. 2007. Re-constructing semantic maps: The comitative-instrumental area. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4). 273–292.
Perlmutter, David M. 1980. Relational grammar. In Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Current approaches to syntax, 195–229. New York: Academic Press [Syntax and Semantics 13].
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Stiebels, Barbara. 2015. Control. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax: Theory and analysis, vol. 11, 412–446. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK), 42].
van Lier, Eva. 2012. Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). 1–16.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Anouba, Acha Arnaud & Huang Dechun
2023.
Risk-Taking and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intention in Côte d’Ivoire SMEs: Moderating Role of Government Subsidy policy.
International Journal of Science and Business ► pp. 126 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2019.
Ergativity and depth of analysis.
Rhema :4, 2019
► pp. 108 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2021.
Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits.
Linguistics 59:1
► pp. 123 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.