Cover not available
Reply published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp.487–503
Reply

Reply to the Reviews of Case: Its Principles and Parameters

| Rutgers University
Published online: 6 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16079.bak
References (14)
References
Baker, Mark. 2001. Phrase structure as a representation of “primitive” grammatical relations. In William Davies and Stan Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects: grammatical functions, functional categories and configurationality, 21–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. On dependent ergative case (in Shipibo) and its derivation by phase. Linguistic Inquiry 451.341–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark and Jonathan Bobaljik. 2017. On inherent and dependent theories of ergative case. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, 111–134. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Winfred Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology, 329–394. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2016. Raising to ergative: Remarks on applicatives of unergatives. Ms. University of California Berkeley. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 50.2. Available at [URL]
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von, Udo Klein, and Dolgor Guntsetseg. 2011. The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian. Lingua 1211.48–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. Paper presented at The 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar. Eugene, Ore.: University of Oregon Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Vinokurova, Nadezhda. 2005. Lexical categories and argument structure: a study with reference to Sakha. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009. On raising and proleptic objects in Sakha. Unpublished ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Haspelmath, Martin
2019. Ergativity and depth of analysis. Rhema :4, 2019 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.