Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:4 (2017) ► pp.914–955

Beyond roots and affixes

Äiwoo deverbal nominals and the typology of bound lexical morphemes

| University of Oslo
This paper discusses the analysis of a particular class of morphemes in the Oceanic language Äiwoo, and argues that the difficulties in accounting for them in traditional terms such as nominalisation, compounding, relative clauses, or classifiers is due to their status as bound lexical morphemes, also known as bound roots, an under-discussed category in linguistic literature. It proposes some parameters of variation within bound lexical morphemes as a class and shows that the Äiwoo facts can be best accounted for by reference to these parameters, both in terms of language-internal description and crosslinguistic comparability. It argues that understanding crosslinguistic morphological structure in terms of a dichotomy between “roots” and “affixes” underplays the existing variation in linguistic structure, and that a more detailed examination is necessary of forms which do not fit clearly into this dichotomy; the discussion of the Äiwoo data aims to provide a starting-point for such an examination.
Keywords: morphology, bound roots, nominalisation, Oceanic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Generic bound nouns (gbns) in Äiwoo
    • 2.1Introduction
    • 2.2Generic bound nouns
    • 2.3Possessives and demonstratives
    • 2.4Bare verbs
    • 2.5Aspect/mood and person marking
    • 2.6Additional arguments and other elements
  • 3.Analysing the generic bound noun constructions
    • 3.1The nominalisation analysis
    • 3.2The compounding analysis
    • 3.3The relative clause analysis
    • 3.4The classifier analysis
  • 4.The problem of bound lexical morphemes
    • 4.1Bound lexical morphemes as a general category
    • 4.2A preliminary typology of bound nouns
      • A.Obligatorily inflected nouns
      • B.Obligatorily modified nouns
      • C.Obligatorily compounding nouns
      • D.Obligatorily modifying nouns
      • E.Incorporated nouns
  • 5.Äiwoo bound nouns revisited
    • 5.1Directly possessed nouns
    • 5.2Plant-part and body-part nouns
    • 5.3Reduced compound forms
    • 5.4Revisiting the parameters
    • 5.5An account of the gbns
    • 5.6The categories ‘root’ and ‘affix’
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16087.nae
References (50)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 2007. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition. Volume II: Complex constructions, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova. 2009. On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85(3). 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2009. Typology of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 343–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: the syntax and pragmatics interface, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan, & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistics Theory 31, 3–13. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E., Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.) 2000. Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Volume I. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1997. Mixed categories as head sharing constructions. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference, University of California, San Diego. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Accessed online: [URL]
Bril, Isabelle. 2002. Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: SELAF/Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2013. Ownership, part-whole, and other possessive-associative relations in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Possession and ownership, 65–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Citko, Barbara. 2004. On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(1). 95–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson. 2007. Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition. Volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & Davis S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Lexical and grammatical meaning. In Geert R. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Volume I1, 257–263. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1999. Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics 65(1). 56–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Early, Robert. A grammar of Lewo. Unpublished manuscript.
Epps, Patience. 2007. Birth of a noun classification system: the case of Hup. In W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), Language endangerment and endangered languages: linguistic and anthropological studies with special emphasis on the languages and cultures of the Andean-Amazonian border area, 107–127. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
. 2008. A grammar of Hup (Mouton Grammar Library 43). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Between headed and headless relative clauses. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: a typological overview, 191–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 2014. A comparative look at nominalizations in Austronesian. In I Wayan Arka & N. L. K. Mas Indrawati (eds.), Argument realisations and related constructions in Austronesian languages: papers from 12-ICAL, 1–51. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette & Frank Seifart. 2004. Noun classes in African and Amazonian languages: towards a comparison. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 243–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2004. Maria’s ring of gold: adnominal possession and non-anchoring relations in European languages. In Ji-yung Kim, Yury A. Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: semantics and syntax, 155–181. Amherst, Mass: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1983. Relational classifiers. Lingua 601. 147–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Joachim Mugdan. 2000. Internal structure of words. In Geert R. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Volume I1, 404–416. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer. 2009. Introduction: status and definition of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley. 2002. The Oceanic languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 601. 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 621. 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne and Greville G. Corbett. 1999. The effect of noun incorporation on argument structure. In Lunella Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2016. Referential markers in Oceanic nominalized constructions. In Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Finiteness and nominalization, 171–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mugdan, Joachim. 2015. Units of word-formation. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: an international handbook of the languages of Europe, 235–301. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2006. Bound nominal elements in Äiwoo: a reappraisal of the “multiple noun class systems”. Oceanic Linguistics 45(2). 269–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Voice at the crossroads: symmetrical clause alternations in Äiwoo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. Oceanic Linguistics 54(1). 270–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, to appear. Plural-marking strategies in Äiwoo. Oceanic Linguistics 57:1. DOI logo
Olsen, Susan. 2014. Delineating derivation and compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 26–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill & Dunstan Brown. 2007. Heads in Oceanic indirect possession. Oceanic Linguistics 46(1). 199–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirani, Laura. 2008. Bound roots in Mandarin Chinese and comparison with European «semi-words». In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20). Volume 11, 261–277. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm & Åshild Næss. 2007. An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands? Oceanic Linguistics 46(2). 456–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1986. Some notes on noun incorporation. Language 621. 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2000. Morphology and syntax. In Geert R. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Volume I1, 312–334. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2011. The problem of crosslinguistic identification. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 90–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sugita, Hiroshi. 1973. Semitransitive verbs and object incorporation in Micronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 12(1/2). 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, René & Brenda H. Boerger. 2011. A Proto-Oceanic passive? Evidence from Bola and Natügu. Oceanic Linguistics 50(1). 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Linden, An & Françoise Rose. 2017. How to distinguish between nouns and classifiers in Binominal Naming Constructions? Answers from two Amazonian languages. Conference presentation, 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, University of Zürich.
Whaley, Lindsay. 1997. Introduction to typology: the unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. 1981. Notes on nominal classification systems in Äiwo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. In Andrew Gonzalez & David Thomas (eds.), Linguistics across continents: studies in honor of Richard S. Pittman, 123–142. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics and Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar