Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp.418–454

The affective construction in Yoron Ryukyuan

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
| Okinawa International University
In Yoron Ryukyuan, passives are formed through the verbal suffix ‘-ari’. In this article, we observe that the suffix is used to form a construction distinguished from the standard passives in several respects: (i) attachment of ‘-ari’ to a wide range of predicates, (ii) ‘-ari’ obligatorily coexisting with the clause-linking suffix ‘-ti’, (iii) the case-marking pattern identical to that of active sentences, among other properties. Semantically, this construction expresses that the speaker is affected (typically, in an adversative fashion) by the situation denoted by the ‘-ari’-attached predicate. We call this linguistic unit "Affective Construction" (AC), revealing its unique syntactic and semantic properties. Furthermore, we suggest that the development of ‘-ari’ into ‘-ari-ti’ to constitute the AC may be viewed as an instance of grammaticalisation, with remarks on its generality in line with Unidirectionality and on the licensing conditions on the AC which seem to be uncommon cross-linguistically.
Keywords: Yoron Ryukyuan, affectedness, passive, voice, case
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Descriptive preliminaries
    • 2.1Basic grammatical properties
    • 2.2Passive constructions
  • 3.The affective construction
    • 3.1Case marking
    • 3.2Grammatical relation and semantic role
    • 3.3Attachability of ‑ari
    • 3.4Co-occurrence with ‑ti
    • 3.5Proposal
  • 4.Further considerations
    • 4.1Semantic issues
    • 4.2Syntactic issues
  • 5.Remarks on grammaticalisation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17002.ser
References (74)
References
Börjars, K. & N. Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 163–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1977. In defense of spontaneous demotion. In P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relations, 47–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1998. Perspectives on grammaticalization. In T. Ohori (ed.), Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization, 7–24. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Estival, D. & J. Myhill. 1988. Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice, 441–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. 2007. Insubordination and its use. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giis, L. 2016. Ryukyu Okinoerabugo Masana-Hougen-no Kijutsu Bunpou Kenkyu. [A descriptive grammatical study on the Masana dialect of Okinoerabu Ryukyuan]. Nishihara, Japan: University of Ryukyus Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1981. Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2). 163–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hanazono, S. 2014. On “ti-form” of the modern Shuri dialect of Okinawan language. Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku Ryuugakusei Nihongo Kyouiku Sentaa Ronshuu 401. 161–71.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalizaion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, P. 2010. Ryukyu-go-wa “hougen”-de-wa-nai. [Ryukyuan languages are not “dialects”] In P. Heinrich & M. Shimoji (eds.), Ryukyu-shogo Kiroku Hozon-no Kiso. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Heinrich, P., S. Miyara, & M. Shimoji. 2015. The Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. & S. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2). 251–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. & E. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horie, K. & P. Pardeshi. 2009. Gengo-no Taiporojii. [Typology of languages] Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Ishizuka, T. 2012. The Passive in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of “subject.” In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 303–33. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & M. Dryer. 2006. Passive in the world’s languages. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 11, 2nd edn, 325–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibe, Y. 2014. Kagoshimaken Yoron hougen. [The dialect of Yoron in Kagoshima Prefecture] In Y. Kibe et al. (eds.), Kikitekina Joukyouniaru Gengo/Hougen-no Jittai-nikansuru Chousa Kenkyuu Houkokusho, 29–46. Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kiku, C. & T. Takahashi. 2005. Yoron Hougen Jiten. [The dictionary of the Yoron dialect]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin Publisher.Google Scholar
Kiku, H. 2006. Yoron-no Kotoba-de Hanasou, vol. 11, 2nd edn. [Let’s speak in the language of Yoron]. Yoron: Yoron Minzoku-mura.Google Scholar
2007. Yoron-no Kotoba-de Hanasou, vol. 21. [Let’s speak in the language of Yoron]. Yoron: Yoron Minzoku-mura.Google Scholar
2009. Yoron-no Kotoba-de Hanasou, vol. 31. [Let’s speak in the language of Yoron]. Yoron: Yoron Minzoku-mura.Google Scholar
2014. Yoron-no Kotoba-de Hanasou, vol. 41. [Let’s speak in the language of Yoron]. Yoron: Yoron Minzoku-mura.Google Scholar
Kinsui, S. 1991. Judoubun-no rekishi-ni tsuite-no ichikousatsu. [A study on the history of passive sentences]. Kokugogaku 1641. 1–14.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, H. 2004. Transitivity of ergative-marking predicates in Japanese. Studies in Language 28(1). 105–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, M. 2008. Nominative object. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 141–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kudo, M. 1990. Gendai nihongo-no judoubun. [Passive sentences in contemporary Japanese]. In Gengogaku-kenkyukai (ed.), Kotoba-no Kagaku, vol. 41, 47–102. Tokyo: Mugi Publishing Company.Google Scholar
2014. Gendai Nihongo Muudo Tensu Asupekuto-Ron. [A study on mood, tense, and aspect in contemporary Japanese]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Kudo, M., K. Nakama, & H. Yakame. 2007. Yoron hougen doushi-no asupekuto, tensu, ebidensharitii. [Aspect-tense-evidentiality of verbs in the Yoron dialect]. Kokugo-to Kokubungaku 84(3). 53–67.Google Scholar
Kulikov, L. 2011. Voice typology. In J. -J. Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 368–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, M. 2005. Nihon Hougen Kiso Goi-no Kenkyu. [A study on the basic vocabulary of dialects in Japan]. Tokyo: Oufu.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. 1978. Danwa-no Bunpo. [The grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1987. Functional Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1979. On Japanese passives. In G. Bedell et al. (eds.), Explorations in Linguistics, 305–47. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Masuoka, T. 1991. Judou hyougen-to shukansei. [Passive expressions and subjectivity]. In Y. Nitta (ed.), Nihongo-no Boisu-to Tadousei, 105–21. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Miyara, S. 2015. Shuri Okinawan grammar. In P. Heinrich et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Ryukyuan Languages, 379–404. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, H. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity and Semantic Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, H. & T. Ohori. 2011. Grammaticalization in Japanese. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 775–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Niinaga, Y., M. Ishihara, & S. Nishioka. 2014. Kitaryuukyuu shogo-no sonzokuryoku-to kikido. [Survival and the degree of endangerment of North Ryukyuan languages]. In M. Shimoji & P. Heinrich (eds.), Ryuukyuu Shogo-no Hoji-o mezashite. Tokyo: Koko.Google Scholar
Nitta, Y. 1995. ‑Shi-te-setsuzoku-o megutte. [On the clause-linking ‑shi-te ]. In Y. Nitta (ed.), Fukubun-no Kenkyu, vol. 11, 87–126. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Ohori, T. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 201–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005. Nihongo-no bunpouka kenkyuu-niatatte. [Perspectives on grammaticalization in Japanese]. Kokugogaku 2221. 1–17.Google Scholar
Pellard, T. 2010. Ōgami (Miyako Ryukyuan). In M. Shimoji & T. Pellard (eds.), An Introduction to Ryukyuan Languages, 113–66. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
2012. Converbs and their desubordination in Ōgami Ryukyuan. Gengo Kenkyu 1421. 95–118.Google Scholar
Sasaki, K. 2006. Kaku. [Case]. In K. Sasaki et al. (eds.), Hougen-no Bunpou. 1–46. Tokyo: Iwanami Publishers.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1977. Grammatical relations and surface cases. Language 53(4). 789–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Nihongo-no Bunseki. [The analysis of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1985. Passive and related constructions. Language 61(4). 821–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Boisu. [Voice]. In N. Yoshio & T. Masuoka (eds.), Nihongo-no Bunpou, vol. 11, 119–86. Tokyo: Iwanami Publishers.Google Scholar
Shigeno, H. & R. Shirata. 2016. Kitaryukyu Amami hougen-niokeru yuuseisei kaisou. [The animacy hierarchy in Amami daialects]. Hiroshima Keizai Daigaku Kenkyu Ronsou 38(4). 111–33.Google Scholar
Shimoji, M. 2015. Ryukyu shohougen-niokeru yuuhyou shukaku-to bunretsu jidousei. [Marked nominative case and split intransitivity in Ryukyuan dialects]. Hougen-no Kenkyu 11. 1–26.Google Scholar
2017. A Grammar of Irabu, a Southern Ryukyuan Language. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar
Shimoji, M. & T. Pellard (eds.). 2010. An Introduction to Ryukyuan Languages. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Shinzato, R. 2007. (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2). 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabor, W. & E. Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In A. Ramat & P. Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization, 229–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takami, K. 1995. Kinouteki Koubunron-niyoru Nichieigo Hikaku. [Comparisons between Japanese and English in functional syntax]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Tohyama, N. 2013. Okinawaken shuri-hougen-niokeru shiekibun-no imikouzou. [Causative constructions in the Okinawa Shuri dialect]. Nihongo Bunpou 13(2). 105–21.Google Scholar
2014. Shuri-hougen-niokeru judoubun-no imikouzou-to benefakutibu. [Benefactive and passive constructions in the Shuri dialect]. International Review of Ryukyuan and Okinawan Studies 31. 11–25.Google Scholar
2015. Okinawa Shuri-hougen-niokeru Boisu-to Riekisei-no Kijutsu Bunpou Kenkyuu. [A descriptive grammatical study of voice and beneficiency in the Shuri dialect of Okinawan]. Nishihara, Japan: University of the Ryukyus Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Tohyama, N. & T. Seraku. 2016. Towards a description of the case system of Yoron Ryukyuan. International Journal of Okinawan Studies 71. 57–81.Google Scholar
Toyota, J. 2011. The Grammatical Voice in Japanese. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In F. Plank (ed.), Ergativity, 385–404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, N. 2007. An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. 2009. Sekai-no Gengo-to Nihongo, 2nd edn. [The world’s languages and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2009. Interactive Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. <[URL]> accessed on 14 Oct 2016.
Wiemer, B. 2011. The grammaticalization of passives. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 535–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, M. 1979. Ryukyugo Doushi-no Keitairon-teki Kouzou. [The morphological structures of verbs in Ryukyuan]. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.Google Scholar
1981. Amami Yoron Hougen-no Taigen-no Gohou. [The usages of nominal expressions in the Yoron dialect]. Tokyo: Daiichi Shobo.Google Scholar
1983. Ryukyu-go Keiyoushi-no Keitaironteki Kouzou. [The morphological structure of adjectives in Ryukyuan languages]. Tokyo: Oufu.Google Scholar
Yamada, M., T. Pellard, & M. Shimoji. 2015. Dunan grammar (Yonaguni Ryukyuan). In P. Heinrich et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Ryukyuan Languages, 449–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Shinzato, Rumiko
2020. Passives as unmarked voice: a case of “warning” Passives in Okinawan. Language Sciences 80 ► pp. 101276 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.