Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:4 (2019) ► pp.757799
References
Abels, Klaus & Peter Muriungi
2008The focus marker in Kîîtharaka: Syntax and semantics. Lingua, 687–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gregory
2006Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Auxiliary Verb Constructions in the Languages of Africa. Studies in African Linguistics 40(1–2). 1409.Google Scholar
Ashton, Ethel O.
1947Swahili grammar, including intonation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aunio, Lotta
2015aContact leading to a more complex tonal system: The case of Ikoma and Datooga in north-west Tanzania. Helsinki: University of Helsinki thesis.Google Scholar
2015bA typological perspective on Bantu nominal tone: The case of Ikoma-Nata-Isenye in western Tanzania. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3). 359–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aunio, Lotta, Holly Robinson, Tim Roth, Oliver Stegen & John B. Walker
2019The Mara languages (JE40). In Koen Bostoen, Derek Nurse, Gérard Philippson & Mark van de Velde (eds), The Bantu Languages, 2nd ed. 501–532. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastin, Yvonne
1989El, prefijo locativo de la clase 18 y la expresión del progresivo presente en bantú (I). Estudios Africanos. Revista de la Asociación Española de Africanistas 4(7). 61–86.Google Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R.
1985Gikuyu ni Kioigire: essays, texts and glossaries. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison thesis.Google Scholar
Bouka, L. Y.
1989Elements de description du kaamba. Parler bantou de la Republique Populaire du Congo (Groupe Koongo, HI7b). Brussels. Universite Libre de Bruxelles thesis.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert
1989Reconstruction of a grammaticalized auxiliary in Bantu. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences. 19(2). 169–186.Google Scholar
2004Specificity in Lusaamia infinitives. Studies in Language 28(1). 137–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias
2013The twelve modern Khoisan languages. Paper presented at Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (Research in Khoisan Studies 29), Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
2014Classifying the non-Bantu click languages. In Lungisile Ntsebeza & Chris Sanders (eds), Papers from the Pre-Colonial Catalytic Project, vol. 11, 80–102. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cammenga, Jelle
2002Phonology and Morphology of Ekegusii: A Bantu language of Kenya. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
2004Igikuria Phonology and Morphology: A Bantu language of South-West Kenya and North-West Tanzania. East-African languages and dialects. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1987Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics 531. 253–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans
1988Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
1991Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and Aspect Systems. New York: Basil BlackwGell.Google Scholar
Dom, Sebastian & Koen Bostoen
2015Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo language cluster. Africana Linguistica 211. 163–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drubig, Hans B.
2003Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41(1). 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Margaret
2005Eléments de description du langi, langue Bantu F.33 de Tanzanie (Collection Langues et littératures de l’Afrique noire SELAF 413). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ehret, Christopher
1986Proposals on Khoisan reconstruction. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7(2). 105–130.Google Scholar
Elderkin, Edward D.
1986Diachronic Inferences from basic sentence and noun Structure in Central Khoisan and Sandawe. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 71. 131–156.Google Scholar
1989The significance and origin of the use of pitch in Sandawe. York: University of York dissertation.Google Scholar
Gibson, Hannah
2012Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A Dynamic Syntax perspective. London: SOAS University of London dissertation.Google Scholar
2013Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A case of contact-induced change? SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 161. 153–166.Google Scholar
2016A unified dynamic account of auxiliary placement in Rangi. Lingua 1841. 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Auxiliary constructions in Bantu. Essex: University of Essex thesis.Google Scholar
Gibson, Hannah & Lutz Marten
2019Probing the interaction of language contact and internal innovation: Four case studies of morphosyntactic change in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics 491. 63–92.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed), Universals of Language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 “Complex predicates based on generic auxiliaries as an areal feature in Northeast Africa.” Studies in African linguistic typology 641. 131–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Khoisan language classification today. In Tom Güldemann & Anne-Maria Feh (eds), Beyond ‘Khoisan’: Historical Relations in the Kalahari Basin, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom, and Rainer Vossen
2000 “Khoisan.“ African languages: An introduction, 99–122.Google Scholar
Gunnink, Hilde
2016The fronted-infinitive in few. Paper presented at 6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University. 20–23rd June 2016.
Guthrie, Malcolm
1967–71Comparative Bantu. Farnborough: Gregg.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory
1990The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7(1). 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadermann, Pascale
1996Grammaticalisation de la structure infinitive+verbé conjugue dans quelques langues bantoues. Studies in African Linguistics 25(2). 155–169.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra
2013Introduction to Cleft structures. In Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds). Cleft Structures, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry & John Watters
1984Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 151. 233–273.Google Scholar
Kerr, Elisabeth J.
2017Focus marking in Ekegusii. Cambridge: University of Cambridge thesis.Google Scholar
Kießling, Roland
2007The “marked nominative” in Datooga. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28(2). 149–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous & Derek Nurse
2008The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. A Linguistic Geography of Africa. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 186–227. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
de Kind, Jasper, Sebastian Dom, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen
2015Event-centrality and the pragmatics-semantics interface in Kikongo: From predication focus to progressive aspect and vice versa. Folia Linguistics Historica 361. 113–163.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2008Information structure and grammaticalization. In Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 77), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leslau, Wolf
1945The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word 11. 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maho, Jouni Filip
1999A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Marten, Lutz
Forthcoming. Bantu and Bantoid. In Rainer Vossen ed. Handbook of African Linguistics Oxford Oxford University Press
Marten, Lutz, Peter Edelesten, Rozenn Guérois & Hannah Gibson
2018Database of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Leverhulme Trust funded project ‘Morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: typology, contact and change’.Google Scholar
Meeussen, Achille Emille
1967Bantu Grammatical Reconstructions. Africana Linguistica 31. 79–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko
2013Gĩkũyũ. Unpublished ms. Paper presented to the Predicate-centered focus types: B7 project meeting, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Nov. 19, 2013.
2016Verb doubling vs. the conjoint/disjoint alternation. Paper presented at 6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University 20–23rd June 2016.
2017The Kikuyu focus marker nĩ: formal and functional similarities to the conjoint/disjoint alternation. In Jenneke van der Wal & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), The conjoint/disjoint alternation in Bantu, 147–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten
1993A grammar of Iraqw (Cushitic Language Studies 9). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
2000Counter-universal rise of infinitive-auxiliary order in Mbugwe (Tanzania, Bantu, F34.). In Rainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner & Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 469–481. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
2004A grammatical sketch of Mbugwe: Bantu F34, Tanzania (Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
2016Alagwa Grammar, Texts and Lexicon (Cushitic Language Series). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Ndumbu, J. M. G. & W. H. Whiteley
1962Some problems of stability and emphasis in Kamba one-word tenses. Journal of African Languages 1(2). 167–180.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek
2000Diachronic morphosyntactic change in Western Tanzania. In Rainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner and Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 517–534. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
2003Aspect and tense in Bantu languages. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages, 90–102. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek & Gérard Philippson
2006Common TA markers in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 271. 155–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippson, Gérard and Derek Nurse
2000Gweno, a little known Bantu language of Northern Tanzania. Unpublished manuscrip. Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Paris / Dynamique du Langage, Lyon and Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Riedel, Kristina
2009The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. Amsterdam: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Roth, Tim
2014The Case of Ngoreme: Distinguishing contact from inheritance in Mara Bantu. Paper presented at Language Contact: State of the Art, Helsinki, Finland.
2018Aspect in Ikoma and Ngroreme: a comparison and analysis of two Western Serengeti Bantu languages. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1973Focus and relativization. Language 49(1). 19–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2003aFocus marking in Kikuyu. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin thesis.Google Scholar
2003bFocus marking in Kikuyu. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 301. 41–118.Google Scholar
2007Ex-situ focus in Kikuyu. In Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Focus strategies in African languages: The interaction of focus and grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, 139–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stegen, Oliver
2002Derivational processes in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics 31(1/2). 129–153.Google Scholar
2006Participatory Research, TAM Functions, and Dialect Survey Among the Rangi. SIL, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Takizala, Alexis
1972Focus and relativisation: The case of Kihung’an. Studies in African Linguistics 3(2). 259–286.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufmann
1988Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley; University of California Press.Google Scholar
van de Velde, Mark & Koen Bostoen
2019The Bantu languages, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke
2016Diagnosing focus. Studies in Language 40(2). 259–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, John B.
2013Comparative tense and aspect in the Mara Bantu languages: Towards a linguistic history. Langley City, CA: Trinity Western University thesis.Google Scholar
Westphal, Ernst O. J.
1971The click languages of southern and eastern Africa. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics 7: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, 367–420. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred. H.
1959The tense system of Gusii. Kampala: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsen, Vera
2014Periphrastic verbs in Mbugwe (F34). Unpublished ms. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
2018A description of the Mbugwe lanaguage – with a focus on tone and TAM. Uppsala: Uppsala University dissertation.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard, Ian Maddieson, Peter Ladefoged & Bonny Sands
1995A phonetic study of Sandawe clicks. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 911. 1–24.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Harvey, Andrew, Hannah Gibson & Richard Griscom
2023. Preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley revisited. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 44:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.