Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:1 (2019) ► pp.195230
References
Alisultanova, Mesedu A.
(transl.) & Patimat A. Magomedova (ed.) 2010Dunjalla baχunnirsːi χalɢilƛol ɢʷanab mits’ːillasːol muχal [World fairy tales in Andi]. Makhachkala: Nural iršad.Google Scholar
Belyaev, Oleg
2018Aorist, resultative and perfect in Shiri Dargwa and beyond. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 80–119. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Helma van den
2004Coordinating constructions in Daghestanian languages. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 197–226. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cercvadze, Ilja I.
1965Andijskij jazyk (Rezjume) [The Andi language (Summary) (in Russian)]. In Ilja Cercvadze, 4Andiuri ena [The Andi language (in Georgian)], 311–392. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova
2012Adverbial clauses in the Tsezic languages. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 157–190. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2009Participles and finiteness: the case of Akhvakh. Linguistic Discovery 7.1. 106–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012External agreement in the converbal construction of Northern Akhvakh. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 127–156. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF – Language typology and Universals 61(4). 309–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirr, Adolf M.
1906Kratkij grammatičeskij očerk andijskago jazyka [A grammar sketch of Andi] Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemën Kavkaza [Collection of materials for the description of places and tribes of the Caucasus]. Tbilisi: Upravlenie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne
2000Direct and indirect experience in Salar. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 45–59. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eulenberg, Alexander, Konstantin Kazenin, A. Solovjeva & Sergej Tatevosov
1996Adjunct clauses. In Alexandr E. Kibrik, Sergej G. Tatevosov & Alexander Eulenberg (eds.), Godoberi, 197–209. München / Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2016Toward a typology for additive markers. Lingua 1801. 69–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev
2016Word order and focus particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 239–262. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995aThe converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–56. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1995bContextual and specialized converbs in Lezgian. Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.) Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 415–440. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kalinina, Elena & Nina Sumbatova
2007Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations, 183–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalinina, Elena Ju. & Svetlana Ju. Toldova
1999Atributivizacija [Attributivization]. In Alexandr E. Kibrik & Jakov G. Testelets (eds.), Élementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osvečšenii [Elements of Tsakhur in a typological perspective], 377–419. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
2001Deepričastnye konstrukcii [Gerundial constructions]. Alexandr E. Kibrik, Konstantin I. Kazenin, Jekaterina A. Ljutikova & Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds.), Bagvalinskij jazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari [The Bagvalal language. Grammar. Texts. Dictionary], 554–594. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I. & Yakov G. Testelets
2004Where coordination meets subordination: Converb constructions in Tsakhur (Daghestanian). In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 227–240. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira A.
2011Evidentiality in Tsezic languages. Linguistic Discovery 9(2). 30–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Alexandr E. & Sandro V. Kodzasov
1990Sopostavitel’noe izučenie Dagestanskix jazykov. Imja. Fonetika [Comparative study of Daghestanian languages. Nouns. Phonetics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrei A.
1985Absentiv-Aorist un Resultativ in der andischen Sprache. In Heinz Fähnrich (ed.), Sprachen Europas und Asiens, 55–66. Jena: Friedrich Schiller Universität.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1995The meaning of converb constructions. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 57–96. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko
2000The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365–384. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur
To appear. Structural and functional variations of the perfect in the Lezgic languages. In Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd eds. The perfect volume Amsterdam John Benjamins
2018The aorist/perfect distinction in Nizh Udi. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 120–165. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maisak, Timur A.
2016Glagol’naja sistema rikvaninskogo govora andijskogo jazyka: formoobrazovanie [The verbal system of the Rikvani dialect of Andi: conjugation]. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. October 2016 (Handout)Google Scholar
2017Éndoklitiki vnutri glagola: teper’ i v andijskom [Endoclitics inside the verb: now also in Andi]. Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters]. Insititute of Contemporary Linguistic Research (MPGU) / Institute of Linguistics RAS. Moscow. 25–27.10.2017. (Handout)Google Scholar
Molochieva, Zarina
2010Tense, aspect and mood in Chechen. Leipzig: University of Leipzig dissertation.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1995Some typological parameters of converbs. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 97–136. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2011Ingush grammar. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & David A. Peterson
2010Contact-induced spread of the rare Type 5 clitic. LSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore. 07.01.2010. (Extended abstract) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rochant, Neige
2016Subordinate particles in Zilo dialect of Andi. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. November 2016 (Handout)Google Scholar
Rochant, Neige & Samira Verhees
2017The (auxiliary) verb b-iʁidu in Andi. Historical Linguistics of the Caucasus. École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris. 12–14.04.2017. (Handout)Google Scholar
Salimov, Xangerej S.
2010 (1968)Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka [The Gagatli dialect of Andi]. Makhachkala: Institut Jazyka, Literatury I Iskusstva imeni G. Cadasy.Google Scholar
Sulejmanov, Jakub G.
1957Grammatičeskij očerk andijskogo jazyka. Na materiale govora s. Rikvani [A sketch of the grammar of Andi. Based on material from the dialect of the village Rikvani]. Moscow: Institut Jazykoznanija Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR Moskva dissertation.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2001From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhees, Samira
2018The perfect in Avar and Andi. Cross-linguistic variation among two closely-related East Caucasian languages. In Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle & Laure Lansari (eds.), Tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 261–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Sources

Lukašdi bosam rerhanoɬːi χabar
[Gospel of Luke (in Andi)]. Moscow: Institute for Bible Translation 2015.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Maisak, Timur & Samira Verhees
2024. The ‘Still Not’ Present in Andi: identifying the grammaticalization source. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Maisak, Timur A.
2023. Chapter 5. From an adverb/postposition ‘behind’ to a discourse marker. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227],  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.