Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 45:2 (2021) ► pp.470–498

Caused-Motion and Caused-Position

Syntactic patterns and semantic networks

ORCID logo | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| City University of Hong Kong
According to Goldberg (1995), placement verbs (such as put) are instantiated in the Caused-Motion Construction. Rohde (2001), however, argued that placement verbs in fact occur in a different construction, which she names the Caused-Position Construction, whose semantic value is not ‘cause to move’ but rather ‘cause to be positioned’. The present paper redefines and justifies the postulation of Caused-Position Construction. The Caused-Position Construction is compatible with not only placement verbs but also a variety of other verbs, such as verbs of creation (write or build) or certain stative verbs (want or need), many of which also occur in the Locative Inversion construction. Further, a similar distinction between Caused-Motion and Caused-Position can be attested in Mandarin as well, which suggests that the distinction between two patterns of spatial causation may not be idiosyncratically confined to the English language but motivated by the general patterns of human cognition.
Keywords: Construction Grammar, Caused-Motion Construction, Caused-Position Construction, Locative Inversion, polysemy, English, Mandarin
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
  • 3.Research goals
  • 4.Locative Inversion
    • 4.1Locative Inversion and Caused-Position
    • 4.2Locative Inversion and Caused-Motion
    • 4.3Summary
  • 5.The polysemy of the two constructions
    • 5.1The polysemy of the Caused-Motion
    • 5.2The polysemy of the Caused-Position
      • 5.2.1Conditions of satisfaction imply
      • 5.2.2Cause-Enable
      • 5.2.3Cause-Prevent
      • 5.2.4Cause-Aid
      • 5.2.5Cause-Perceive
    • 5.3PP-collocation of polysemous Caused-Position Verbs
    • 5.4Summary
  • 6.Caused-Motion and Caused-Position in Mandarin
    • 6.1Background
    • 6.2Hypothesis
    • 6.3Methodology
    • 6.4Results
    • 6.5Summary
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 27 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18067.joo
References (27)
References
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & John B. Lowe. 1998. The berkeley framenet project. In Pierre Isabelle (Program Chair), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 11 (Association for Computational Linguistics), 86–90. Montreal: Université de Montreal.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav & Yosef Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57(1). 289–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 1996. The discourse function of inversion in English. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70(1). 72–131. ISSN 0097–8507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jidong. 2012. “She from bookshelf take-descend-come the box”: Encoding and categorizing placement events in Mandarin. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 37–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ying & Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2014. The Mandarin LVS construction: Verb lexical semantics and grammatical aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1). 1–27, 2014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Shan-Shan. 2008. The comparative research of caused motion construction in English and Mandarin: Based on case study of English verbs of putting and their Chinese correspondents. Shanghai: Shanghai University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2).159–190. ISSN 1384-6655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
del Campo Martínez, Nuria. 2013. The metaphoric motivation of the caused-motion construction: A case study of perception. International Journal of English Studies 13(1). 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukada, Chie. 1996. On semantic extensions of verbs of appearance. ⾔語科学論集 (Papers in Linguistic Science) 2. 63–86.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Keh-Jiann Chen & Li-Li Chang. 1996. Segmentation standard for Chinese natural language processing. In Jun’ich Tsujii (Program Chair), Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 21 (Association for Computational Linguistics), 1045–1048. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Hovav Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Mei-chun & Chang, Jui-ching. 2015a. Semantic profile as a source of polysemy: Insight from the spatial-configuration verb fàng in Mandarin. In Qin Lu & Helena Hong Gao (eds.), Chinese lexical semantics: 16th Workshop, CLSW 2015, Beijing, China, May 9–11, 2015, Revised Selected Papers, 24–32. Basel: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Mei-chun & Chiang, Ting-yi. 2008. The construction of Mandarin VerbNet: A frame-based study of statement verbs. Language and Linguistics 9(2). 239–270.Google Scholar
Liu, Meichun. 2003. Motion, direction and spatial configuration: A lexical semantic study of HANG verbs in Mandarin. In Erin Shay & Uwe Seibert (eds.), Motion, direction and location in languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier, 177–187. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Meichun & Che-Wei Chang. 2015b. A lexical-constructional approach to verbal semantics: The case of Mandarin ‘hang’ verbs. International Journal of Knowledge and Language Processing 6(4). 1–19.Google Scholar
Liu, Meichun & Jui-Ching Chang. 2018. Placement verbs in Chinese and English: Language-specific lexicalization patterns. In Jia-Fei Hong, Qi Su & Jiun-Shiung Wu (eds.), Chinese lexical semantics: 19th Workshop, CLSW 2018, Chiayi, Taiwan, May 26–28, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, 454–466. Basel: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Meichun & Yingying Ye. 2020. The construction and annotation of a semantically enriched database: The Mandarin VerbNet and its NLP application. In Qi Su & Weidong Zhan (eds.), From minimal contrast to meaning construct: Corpus-based, near synonym driven approaches to Chinese lexical semantics (Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics 9), 165–177. Basel: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luó, Yúnpǔ [羅云普]. 2011. Hànyǔ duōyì dòngcí fàng de yánjiū [漢語多義動詞「放」的研究]. Guólì qīnghuá dàxué (Shuòshì lùnwén) [國⽴清華⼤學 (碩⼠論⽂)], Xīnzhú shì [新⽵市].Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15(1). 1–68, 2004. ISSN 0936–5907. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohde, Ada Ragna. 2001. Analyzing path: The interplay of verbs, prepositions and constructional semantics. Houston, TX: Rice University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1975. On two functions of place adverbials in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3(2/3). 154–179. Available at: [URL]. Last access: 23 April 2020.
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xún, Ēndōng [荀恩东], Gāoqí Ráo [饶⾼琦], Xiǎoyuè Xiāo [肖晓悦], & Jiāojiāo Zāng [臧娇娇]. 2016. Dàshùjū bèijǐng xià BCC yǔliàokù de yánzhì [⼤数据背景下 BCC 语料库的研制]. Yǔliàokù yǔyánxué [语料库语 ⾔学] 3(1). 93–118.Google Scholar