Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 19:2 (1995) ► pp.525532
Anderson, John M.
1985 “Structural Analogy and Dependency Phonology.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 191: 5–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 “Structural Analogy and Case Grammar.” Lingua 701: 79–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “The Tradition of Structural Analogy.” in: Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold. eds., Language Topics: Essays in Honor of Michael Halliday, 33–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1989 “Reflections on Notional Grammar, With Some Remarks on its Relevance to Issues in the Analysis of English and its History.” in: Doug Arnold, Martin Atkinson, Jacques Duran, Claire Grover and Louisa Sadler. eds., Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar, 13–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate & Theo Vennemann
1972Semantic Structures. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11.
DeArmond, Richard C.
1984 “On the Development of the Verb Phrase in English Syntax.” in: Norman F. Blake & Charles Jones. eds., English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development. (CECTAL Conference Papers Series 31.), 205–226.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1985A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1961 “Categories of the Theory of Grammar.” Word 171: 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Sidney M.
1966Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1967Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. (2nd Edition.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar