Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp.191–230

Nominal classification

Does it play a role in referent disambiguation?

| University of Surrey
It is often claimed that reference tracking is a key function of nominal classification systems, not least because of the role such systems can play in referent disambiguation. This paper reports on the results of a comparative study of reference in texts from four languages, focusing specifically on the disambiguating function of nominal classification. The results strongly suggest that disambiguation is not a primary function of nominal classification systems. While gender and/or classifiers sometimes contribute to the avoidance of referential conflict, the reality is that the conditions have to be just right – all competing references must be of opposing genders, and those genders must be formally distinct – and this happens with surprisingly low frequency. We are better off viewing disambiguation as a convenient by-product of nominal classification systems that a language can exploit when conditions allow.
Keywords: nominal classification, gender, classifiers, referent, disambiguation, reference tracking, referential conflict
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Terminology and scope
    • 2.1Terminology
    • 2.2Scope of the study
  • 3.Methods of investigating reference tracking
    • 3.1Existing methods of investigating reference tracking
    • 3.2Limitations of existing methods
    • 3.3Methodology
      • 3.3.1Activation score
      • 3.3.2Contribution of gender score
      • 3.3.3Contribution of classifier score
  • 4.Data
    • 4.1Skolt Saami
    • 4.2Spanish
    • 4.3Kilivila
    • 4.4Mian
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Correlations between referential choice and activation scores
    • 5.2Contribution of gender in reducing or eliminating referential conflict
    • 5.3Contribution of classifiers in reducing or eliminating referential conflict
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19026.fei
References (37)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79(4). 708–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. 1865. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1996. Inferring identifiability and accessibility. In Thorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility, 37–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stephen A. 2012. Participant reference in narrative discourse: A comparison of three methodologies. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 401. 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville, Sebastian Fedden & Raphael Finkel. 2017. Single versus concurrent systems: nominal classification in Mian. Linguistic Typology 21(2). 209–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Córdova, Jennifer Lynn. 2009. Participant reference and tracking in San Francisco Ozolotepec Zapotec. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Dieterman, Julia. 2002. Word order variation in Isthmus Mixe. Studies in Language 26(2). 217–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1986. Noun classes and noun classification in typological perspective. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization: Proceedings of a symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983, 105–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Robert A. & Stephen H. Levinsohn. 2001. Analyzing discourse: a manual of basic concepts. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Edwards, Timothy Alan. 2011. Participant reference in Tai Dam narrative discourse. Chiang Mai: Payap University MA dissertation.Google Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian. 2011. A grammar of Mian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian & Greville G. Corbett. 2017. Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1). 34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feist, Timothy. 2015. A grammar of Skolt Saami. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura (Finno-Ugrian Society).Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana. 2009. Information structure and reference-tracking in Hinuq. Caucasiologic Papers, 181–186.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward, Richard Futrell, Steven T. Piandadosi, Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Leon Bergen & Roger Levy. 2019. How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23(5). 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1983. Referential tracking in Nunggubuyu (Australia). In John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds.), Switch reference and universal grammar, 129–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. The Oxford dictionary of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, Kendall Mark. 2007. Participant reference in Tunen narrative discourse. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Catherine. 2012. Reference in Udi narrative discourse. Grand Forks, ND: UND MA thesis.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1920. Classificatory particles in the language of Kiriwina. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 1(4). 33–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runge, Steven Edward. 2007. A discourse–functional description of participant reference in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University DLitt dissertation.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Kilivila: The language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Ruth. 2016. The dynamics of nominal classification: Productive and lexicalised uses of gender agreement in Mawng (Pacific Linguistics 642). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 2008. “Double reference” in Kala Lagaw Ya narratives. In Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds.), Discourse and grammar in Australian languages, 167–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoll, Sabine & Balthasar Bickel. 2009. How deep are differences in referential density? In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the traditions of Dan Slobin, 543–555. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell. 1987. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 455–479. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Language contact and the function of linguistic gender. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 351. 133–152.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Berg, Thomas
2024. Gender, number and person: a three-way interaction. Linguistic Typology 0:0 DOI logo
Parajuli, Krishna Prasad & Marc Allassonnière-Tang
2024. A corpus-based quantitative study of numeral classifiers in Nepali. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Saikia, Pori & Marc Allassonnière-Tang
2023. Chapter 3. Nominal classification in Assamese. In Nominal Classification in Asia and Oceania [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 362], ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Senft, Gunter
2023. Chapter 2. The system of classifiers in Kilivila. In Nominal Classification in Asia and Oceania [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 362], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Fedden, Sebastian
2022. Agreement and argument realization in Mian discourse. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.