Markers of epistemic modality and their origins
Evidence from two unrelated sign languages
Native deaf signers express epistemic modality by different means: mental-state words, clause-internal particles,
signs indicating hypothesis, and nonmanually. The data for this study come from two unrelated sign languages, Danish Sign Language
and Japanese Sign Language. In dialogues the signers use both calques of majority-language words and signs that appear to have
emerged in the sign languages only. Based on the multi-functionality of some word forms, the origin of the epistemic modal
particles may be traced back to tags, interjections, and lexical signs, a route motivated by interaction and also found in
unrelated spoken languages. Furthermore, in both sign languages, the first-person pronoun can be used, without a verb, as an
epistemic “anchor” of a proposition, a construction that seems specific to languages in the gestural-visual modality. Another
modality-specific feature is the possibility of transferring the expression of a marker of epistemic uncertainty from one
articulator to another.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Epistemic modality
- 3.Epistemic modality in sign languages
- 4.The two sign languages and the data
- 5.How to understand the sign language examples of this study
- 6.Expressions of epistemic modality in the data
- 6.1Signs about mental states and activities
- 6.2Multifunctional particles in the data
- 6.3Calques of markers of epistemic modality in the majority languages
- 6.4Nonmanual markers of speaker uncertainty in DTS
- 7.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (92)
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2). 301–344.
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Douglas A. Lawrie & Allan Wade. 1992. Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes 15(4). 469–489.
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Linda Coates & Loti Roe. 1995. Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(4). 394–405.
Bergman, Britta & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen. 2010. Transmission of sign languages in the Nordic countries. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 74–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1). 1–44.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boyes Braem, Penny. 2001. Functions of the mouthing component in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 1–47. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra. 2015. Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(2–3). 95–123.
Bross, Fabian & Daniel Hole. 2017. Scope-taking strategies and the order of clausal categories in German Sign Language. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1). 1–30.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen & Silvia Iglesias-Lago. 2015. Spanish Sign Language. In Julie B. Jepsen, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo-Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook, 729–769. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen. 2013. Modality and linguistic change in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). CogniTextes 101.
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York, NY: Academic Press
Conlin, Frances, Paul Hagstrom & Carol Neidle. 2003. A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery 2(1). 1–21.
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri. 2012. Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication 321. 329–348.
Crasborn, Onno. 2015. Transcription and notation methods. In Eleni Orfanidou, Bencie Woll & Gary Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 75–88. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2009. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52(2–3). 287–314.
Delaporte, Yves. 2007. Dictionnaire étymologique et historique de la langue des signes française: Origine et évolution de 1200 signes. Les Essarts-le-Roi: Éditions du Fox.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1990. Pragmatics of nonmanual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In William H. Edmondson & Fred Karlsson (eds.), SLR ‘87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 121–128. Hamburg: Signum.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Press.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1994. Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Mary Brennan & Graham H. Turner (eds.), Word-order issues in sign language: Working papers presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991, 73–87. Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association, The Deaf Studies Research Unit, University of Durham.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2002a. Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. In Rolf Schulmeister & Heimo Reinitzer (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz/Fortschritte in der Gebärdensprachforschung: Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz, vol. 401/Band 401, 143–162. Hamburg: Signum.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2002b. Grammatical relations in Danish Sign Language: Topic and subject. In Anneli Pajunen (ed.), Mimesis, sign, and the evolution of language, vol. 31, 5–40. Turku: Turun yliopisto/University of Turku.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2015. Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics, 11. 411–431.
Ferreira Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian sign language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics, 229–260. Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, Susan & Qunhu Gong. 2010. Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, Susan & Wynne Janis. 1990. Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on sign language research, 75–85. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Fischer, Susan D. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 981. 103–119.
Fischer, Susan. 2003. The cross-linguistic study of sign languages. TCT Education of Disabilities 2(1). 1–17.
Gabarró-López, Silvia. 2017. Discourse markers in French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB) and Catalan Sign Language (LSC): BUOYS, PALM-UP and SAME: Variation, functions and position in discourse. Namur: University of Namur dissertation.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2013. Homesign: When gesture is called upon to be language. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silvia Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 11, 113–125. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hansen, Erik & Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog I–III1 [Grammar of the Danish language]. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.
Heine, Bernd & Tanya Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Addressing epistemic incongruence in question–answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 107–130. Cambridge, ILL: Cambridge University Press.
Herrero-Blanco, Ángel & Ventura Salazar-García. 2010. The expression of modality in Spanish Sign Language. In Gerry Wanders & Evelien Keizer (eds.), The London Papers II, 19–42 (WEB Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 83). Available at: [URL] last access 5 July 2020.
Herrmann, Annika. 2013. Modal and focus particles in sign languages: A cross-linguistic study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hsin, Ai-li. C. 2016. An analysis of Chinese tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 67–118.
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 199–223. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Trevor, Donovan Cresdee, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2015. FINISH variation and grammaticalization in a signed language: How far down this well-trodden pathway is Auslan (Australian Sign Language)? Language Variation and Change 271. 117–155.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2010. Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think
. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 237–265. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Kendon, Adam. 1988. How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
Kendon, Adam. 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23(3). 247–279.
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lackner, Andrea. 2017. Functions of head and body movements in Austrian Sign Language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the mind hears: A history of the deaf. New York, NY: Random House.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Modals: Striving for control. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge A. Hita, & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, 3–55. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Matsui, Tomoko, Taeko Yamamoto & Peter McCagg. 2006. On the role of language in children’s early understanding of others as epistemic beings. Cognitive Development 211. 158–173.
Matsuoka, Kazumi, Uiko Yano, Hitomi Akahori & Norie Oka. 2016. Notes on modals and negation in Japanese Sign Language. Studies in Language Sciences: Journal of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences 151. 1–20.
Meier, Richard P. 2012. Language and modality. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 574–601. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2013. Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343.
Merriam-Webster.com. 2020. Available at: [URL], last access 5 July 2020.
Mesch, Johanna. 2016. Manual backchannel responses in signers’ conversations in Swedish Sign Language. Language & Communication 501. 22–41.
Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 255–268. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 2012. Tags: Cross-linguistic diversity and commonality. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 2165–2182.
Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: a case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture: Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.
Ordbog over Dansk Tegnsprog [Dictionary of Danish Sign Language]. 2019. Available at: [URL], last access 5 July 2020.
Ordbog over det danske sprog [Dictionary of the Danish language]. 2020. Available at: [URL], last access 5 July 2020.
Padden, Carol, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers. 2015. Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(2–3). 81–94.
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2007. On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language. In Pamela M. Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 129–161. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2011. Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pfau, Roland. 2012. Manual communication systems: Evolution and variation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 513–551. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Sandler, Wendy. 2003. On the complementarity of signed and spoken languages. In Yonata Levy & Jeanette C. Schaeffer (eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment, 383–410. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sandler, Wendy. 2010. The uniformity and diversity of language: Evidence from sign language. Lingua 1201. 2727–2732.
Sandler, Wendy. 2012. Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Sandler, Wendy. 2013. Vive la différence: Sign language and spoken language in language evolution. Language and Cognition 5(2–3). 189–203.
Sapountzaki, Galini G. 2005. Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. Bristol: University of Bristol PhD dissertation.
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shaffer, Barbara & Terry Janzen. 2016. Modality and mood in American Sign Language. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 448–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. CAN’T: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3(1). 34–53.
Shaffer, Barbara. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 175–195.
Siyavoshi, Sara. 2019. Hands and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 30(4). 655–686.
Spread the Sign. 2018. Available at: [URL], last access 5 July 2020.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torigoe, Takashi. 1994. Resumptive X structure in Japanese Sign Language. In Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure, 187–198. Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association.
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, & Eline Demey. 2007. Sign + gesture = speech + gesture? In Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson, & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, 258–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Lorraine Leeson, & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilcox, Phyllis P. 1996. Deontic and epistemic modals in ASL: Discourse analysis. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language, 481–492. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer. 2006. Modality in American Sign Language. In William Frawley, Wolfgang Klein & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Expression of cognitive categories: The expression of modality, 207–237. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wilcox, Sherman, Paolo Rossini & Elena Antinoro Pizzuto. 2010. Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 332–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xavier, André Nogueira & Sherman Wilcox. 2014. Necessity and possibility modals in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras). Linguistic Typology 18(3). 449–448.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Moya-Avilés, Berta, Gemma Barberà & Carme Bach
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.