Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:4 (2020) ► pp.964–994
News from the field

Ditransitive constructions in Akebu

| Institute of Linguistics RAS
| Institute of Linguistics RAS
This paper contributes to the typology of ditransitive constructions. Akebu (Kwa, Ghana-Togo mountain, West Africa) has four strategies of alignment of ditransitive verbs, if both theme and recipient objects are expressed: a neutral strategy, a possessive-like strategy, a strategy with a pronominal reprise and a ‘take’ serial verb construction strategy. The possessive-like strategy that is most standard in Akebu is rare in a cross-linguistic perspective and has not been attested in other Kwa languages. The factors that license a certain strategy are person, number and noun class of the theme and recipient and the internal structure of the theme noun phrase.
Keywords: alignment, ditransitive constructions, adnominal ditransitives, Akebu, Kwa, rarissima
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cross-linguistic and Kwa background
    • 2.1Ditransitive constructions in Kwa
    • 2.2Possessive-like ditransitive constructions
  • 3.Overview of Akebu ditransitives
    • 3.1The lexical class of ditransitive verbs
    • 3.2Alignment strategies of ditransitive verbs
    • 3.3Alternative alignment and omission of arguments
  • 4.Neutral strategy
  • 5.Possessive-like strategy
  • 6.Strategy with a pronominal reprise
  • 7.Strategy with a ‘take’ serial verb construction
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19068.shl
References (65)
References
Aboh, Enoch Oladé. 1998. Focus constructions and the focus criterion in Gungbe. Linguistique africaine 201. 5–50.Google Scholar
Adjeoda, Dzifa. 2008. Eléments de morphosyntaxe du kebu, langue dite résiduelle du Togo. Université de Lomé, maîtrise.Google Scholar
Akrofi Ansah, Mercy. 2010. Focused constituent interrogatives in Lɛtɛ (Larteh). Nordic Journal of African Studies 19(2). 98–107.Google Scholar
Amoua, Kwamivi. 2011. Le système nominal du kebu. Université de Lomé: maîtrise.Google Scholar
Atoyebi, Joseph, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Yorùbá. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 145–165. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger. 2009. Do the Ghana-Togo mountain languages constitute a genetic group? The Journal of West African Languages 36(1/2). 19–36.Google Scholar
Bobuafor, Mercy. 2013. A grammar of Tafi. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Conti, Carmen. 2008. Receptores y beneficiarios: Estudio tipológico de la ditransitividad. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1979. Les constructions dites “possessives”, étude de linguistique générale et de typologie linguistique. Université Paris 41: thèse d’état.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Jérémie Kouadio N’Guessan. 1977. Description phonologique et grammaticale d’un parler baoulé. Abidjan: Institut de Linguistique Appliquée.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Jérémie Kouadio. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Baule. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 166–189. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1985. Indirect object “lowering”. In Proceedings of the 11th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 39–51. Berkeley: BLS.Google Scholar
Djitovi, Afi. 2003. English and Akebu phonologies: A comparative analysis. Université de Lomé: maîtrise.Google Scholar
Dorvlo, Kofi. 2008. A grammar of Logba (Ikpana). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 621. 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Clause types. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd ed., vol. 21, 224–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 22nd ed. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]
Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent complement verbs revisited: towards an understanding of argument structure in Ewe. Leiden University: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2010. Inherent complement verbs and the basic double object construction in Gbe. In Enoch O. Aboh & James Essegbey (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax, 177–193. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedotov, Maxim. 2016. Adnominal predicative possessive construction and pragmatically “flexible” noun phrases in Gban. Issledovanija po jazykam Afriki [Studies on African languages] 61. 320–345.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Ines. 1998. Fokus im Aja. In Ines Fiedler, Catherine Griefenow-Mewis & Brigitte Reineke (eds.), Afrikanische Sprachen im Brennpunkt der Forschung, 75–89. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Gblem, Honorine Massanvi. 1995. Description systematique de l’igo. Université de Grenoble III1: thèse de doctorat.Google Scholar
Gblem-Poidi, Honorine Massanvi & Laré Kantchoa. 2012. Les langues du Togo: État de la recherche et perspectives. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Harley, Matthew W. 2009. Focus constructions in Tuwuli. Journal of West African Languages 36(1–2). 75–90.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment. Functions of Language 14(1). 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. Transitivity prominence. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, vol. 11, 131–147. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Ditransitive constructions. Annual Review of Linguistics 11. 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1968. Die Verbreitung und Gliederung der Togorestsprachen. Köln: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Christa König. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32 (1). 87–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hérault, Georges. 1978. Éléments de grammaire adioukrou. Université de Paris VII1: thèse de doctorat.Google Scholar
Kazama, Shinjiro. 2012. Designative case in Tungusic languages. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 123–154. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky. A rare type of benefactive construction: Evidence from Enets. Linguistics 52(6). 1391–1431. DOI logo
Kittilä, Seppo. 2006a. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking. Studies in Language 30(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44(3). 569–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koffi, Yao. 2010. Pronouns in Akebu. ERIC Online submission ED510110. [URL]
Kouadio N’Guessan, Jérémie. 1996. Description systematique de l’attie de Memni, vol. 11. Université de Grenoble III1: thèse de doctorat.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1994. New facts from Fongbe on the double object constructions. Lingua 94(2–3). 69–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1982. The development of object markers in serial verb languages. In Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Studies in transitivity, 277–300. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
M’boma, Komlavi Malanbo. 2014. Kekpèe kè léh Biblae Kéhnit yè loh otuèlêe yorrot-yorrot yè. Les prémices de la Sainte Bible en akébou. [No place of publication.]Google Scholar
Makeeva, Nadezhda. 2016. Fonotaktika jazyka akebu [Phonotactics of Akebu]. In Ekaterina Devjatkina et al. (eds.), Problemy jazyka, 199–211. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN.Google Scholar
. 2018. Prilagatel’nye i kvalitativnnye glagoly v jazyke akebu [Adjectives and qualitative verbs in Akebu]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies 10(1). 14–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makeeva, Nadezhda, & Andrey Shluinsky. 2017. Bitranzitivnaja konstrukcija v jazyke akebu [A ditransitive construction in Akebu]. In Ekaterina A. Lyutikova & Anton V. Cimmerling (eds.), Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov 41, 161–176. Moscow: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute.Google Scholar
. 2018. Noun classes and class agreement in Akebu. Journal of West African Languages 45(1). 1–26.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2018. Typological remarks on “internal” beneficiaries and the benefactive-possessive convergence. In Agnes Korn & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). Ditransitive constructions in a typological perspective, 13–25. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 1–64. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Peter Austin. 2007. Three-participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3). 393–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, Eric A. 2010. A grammar of Ajagbe. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Muraviev, Nikita. 2015. O nekotoryx služebnyx edinicax s neopredelennoj kategorial’noj prinadležnost’ju v jazyke akebu [Some grammatical elements of unspecified categories in Akebu]. Issledovanija po jazykam Afriki [Studies on African languages] 51. 201–221. Moscow: Ključ-S.Google Scholar
. 2016. Strategii kodirovanija finitnyx sentencial’nyx aktantov v jazyke akebu [Strategies of finite sentential complements encoding in Akebu]. Issledovanija po jazykam Afriki [Studies on African languages] 61. 195–210. Moscow: Ključ-S.Google Scholar
Osam, Emmanuel Kweku. 1994. Aspects of Akan grammar: A functional perspective. University of Oregon, Eugene: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1996. The object relation in Akan. Afrika und Übersee 791. 57–83.Google Scholar
. 1997. Serial verbs and grammatical relations in Akan. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective, 253–279. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The status of the indirect object in Akan. Journal of Asian and African Studies 591. 171–177.Google Scholar
Say, Sergey. 2014. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1). 116–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shluinsky, Andrey. 2008. Bitranzitivnye glagoly v jazykax kva i sintaksičeskij status ix ob”ektov (na materialie ève i akan) [Ditransitive verbs in Kwa and syntactic status of their objects (based on Ewe and Akan)]. In Viktor Vinogradov & Victor Prokhomovsky (eds.), Issledovanija po jazykam Afriki 21, 90–137. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN.Google Scholar
. 2012. Ob”ekty v bitranzitivnoj konstrukcii v jazykax kva: vnutrigenetičeckoe sopostavlenie [Objects in Kwa ditransitive construction: an intragenetic comparison]. Afrikanskij sbornik 2011. 300–318. St. Petersburg: Lema.Google Scholar
. 2017. An intragenetic typology of Kwa serial verb constructions. Linguistic Typology 21(2). 333–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1997. The history of Micronesian possessive classifiers and benefactive marking in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 36(1). 29–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sossoukpe, Jacques. 2017. Effet voisant du ton bas flottant sur les obstruantes en akebou. In Firmin Ahoua and Benjamin Ohi Elugbe (eds.), Typologie et documentation des langues en Afrique de l’Ouest. Les actes du 27eme Congrès de la société de linguistique de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (SLAO), 139–146. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Stewart, John M. 1963. Some restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of West African Languages 2(2). 145–149.Google Scholar
Stewart, John. 1989. Kwa. In John Bendor-Samuel (ed.), The Niger-Congo languages, 217–245. Lanham: University press of America.Google Scholar
Storch, Anne, and Yao Koffi. 2000. Noun classes and consonant alternation in Akebu (Kə̀gbə̀rə̄kə́). In Antje Meissner & Anne Storch (eds.), Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 121. Nominal classification in African languages, 79–98. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Leynseele, Hélène van. 1975. Restrictions on serial verbs in Anyi. Journal of West African Languages 10(2). 189–218.Google Scholar
Wolf, Franz. 1907. Grammatik des Kögbörikö (Togo). Anthropos 21. 422–437, 795–820.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Shluinsky, Andrey
2023. Adpositions and adpositional relator nouns in Akebu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.