Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:3 (2020) ► pp.659–699

The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size

Phonaesthemic alternations in Reta and in other languages

ORCID logo | Aarhus Universitet
 | Aarhus Universitet
Phonaesthemes are a common phenomenon, but they are generally not in paradigmatic opposition like morphemes are (Svantesson 2017: 6). Reta, however, has a phonaesthemic contrast /l/~/r/, where /r/-colouring of neutral base words signifies an increase in vulgarity, intensity, size or severity (e.g. ɓela ‘bad’ vs. ɓera ‘terrible’, -ool ‘penis’ vs. -oor ‘cock’). This paper describes this phenomenon in detail, and provides a discussion as to whether it is best classified as morphological, phonaesthemic, or otherwise. We argue that, although some of the cross-linguistic criteria for phonaesthesia exclude phonaesthemic /r/ from being classified as such, it is not straightforwardly classified as either phonological or morphological. Using Kwon & Round’s (2015) criteria for phonaesthesia and derivational morphology, we compare Reta phonaesthemic alternations to similar phenomena in other languages. We argue that such alternations differ fundamentally from both non-alternating phonaesthemes and morphology, and are best construed as a distinct cross-linguistic category.
Keywords: phonaesthemes, sound symbolism, alternation, consonant mutation, Timor-Alor-Pantar languages, Reta, Blagar, derivational morphology, augmentative, foreigner speech, markedness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief overview of Reta
  • 3.Phonaesthemic alternations in Reta
    • 3.1Form and function
    • 3.2Phonaesthemic /r/ outside of alternations
  • 4.A tentative explanation for phonaesthemic alternations in Reta
  • 5.Is it phonology, morphology, both, or neither?
    • 5.1Morphology
    • 5.2Phonaesthesia
    • 5.3Phonology
  • 6.Phonaesthemic alternations are not just phonaesthemes
    • 6.1A cross-linguistic overview of phonaesthemic consonant alternations
    • 6.2A proposal for the classification of phonaesthemic alternations
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19073.wil
References (90)
References
Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism. Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. A. 1988. Austronesian root theory: An essay on the limits of morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogoras, Waldemar. 1922. Chuckchee. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages, 631–903. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Böhmerová, Ada. 2011. Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak. A systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis 61. 1–29.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2019. Canonical typology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 409–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1950. Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 61. 117–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate. & Tonya Stebbins. 2016. For the love of language: An introduction to linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Barry F., John H. Esling & Katie Fraser. 2001. Nuuchahnulth. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(2). 275–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83(8). 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3(2). 141–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsen, Hilke. 2017. The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics 31. 491–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John. R. 1930. Speech. London: Benn’s Sixpenny Library.Google Scholar
1951. Modes of meaning. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. 190–215.Google Scholar
1964. The tongues of men & speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Iván. 1963. Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 2006. Iconicity. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2nd edn, 457–461. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, H., Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2019. Glottolog 3.4. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala. 1994. Introduction: sound-symbolic processes. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson, & Antoinette Schapper. 2012. The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 51(1). 86–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gary & Laura C. Robinson. 2017. The linguistic position of the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. In Marian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology, 2nd edn, 147–191. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi, Sotaro Kita, Miho Nagumo, & Hiroyuki Okada. 2008. Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 1091. 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. 1969. Origins of the Nootka pharyngeals. International Journal of American Linguistics 351. 125–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kong-on. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Korean Linguistics 131. 67–75.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78(2). 258–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Field notes on Blagar-Pura. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Kratochvíl, František. 2007. A grammar of Abui. A Papuan language of Alor. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kuehnl, Christina. & Alexandra Mantau. 2013. Same sound, same preferences? Investigating sound symbolism effects in international brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30(4). 417–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. 2000. The phonology/morphology interface: Consonant mutations in Bemba. In Helen de Hoop & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2000, 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nahyun. 2016. The empirically observed iconicity levels of English phonaesthemes. Public Journal of Semiotics 7(2). 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Cross-linguistic variation in phonaesthemic canonicity, with special reference to Korean and English. In Kimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives, 77–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25(1). 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre. 1944. Grammaire basque (navarro-labourdin littéraire). Bayonne: Librairie ‘Le Livre’.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret. 1970. A grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. Sound-symbolism in Yuman languages. In Jesse Sawyer (ed.), Studies in American Indian languages, 149–174. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Lap-Yan, Ho M. Luk & Nigel Thompson. 2017. An investigation of sound-symbolism in the context of tactile feeling. The Journal of General Psychology 144(2). 157–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Gwilym, Mark Dingemanse & Peter Hagoort. 2016. Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 42(8). 1274–81.Google Scholar
Magnus, Margaret. 2001. What’s in a word? Studies in phonosemantics. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 1991. The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: a synchronic-diachronic approach. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1962. Phonetic symbolism in Korean. In Nicholas Poppe (ed.), American studies in Altaic linguistics, 177–89. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
McCune, Keith M. 1985. The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Jakarta: NUSA.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B. 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. (Studies in Language: Companion Series 22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Sound symbolism in Gooniyandi, a language of Western Australia. WORD 47(3). 339–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merrill, John T. M. 2018. The Historical Origin of Consonant Mutation in the Atlantic Languages. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy (eds.), 2019. PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Mutz, Karin. 2015. Evaluative morphology in a diachronic perspective. In Nicola Grandi & Livia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 142–154. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, Friedrich K. 1953. Studien zur georgischen Wortbildung. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ngo, Mary K., Reeva Misra & Charles Spence. 2011. Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference 221. 567–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Language 47(4). 826–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999. The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 281. 225–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rießler, Michael. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Kildin Saami. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 229–244. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1994. Introduction: sound-symbolic processes. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 293–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Laura C. 2010a. Field notes on Reta. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010b. Field notes on Blagar-Bakalang. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010c. Field notes on Blagar-Bama. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010d. Field notes on Blagar-Kulijahi. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010e. Field notes on Blagar-Nule. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010f. Field notes on Blagar-Tuntuli. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
2010g. Field notes on Blagar-Warsalelang. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Sapir, Edward. 1911. Diminutive and augmentative consonantism in Wishram. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages (Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40, part 1), 638–45. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
. 1958 [1915]. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In David G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 179–196. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette. 2017. Introduction. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.), Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Sketch grammars, vol. 21, 1–54. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shrum, L. J., Tina M. Lowrey, David Luna, Dawn B. Lerman, & Min Liu. 2012. Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 29(3). 275–279.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1994. Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min. 1994. Korean. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Charles & Alberto Gallace. 2011. Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality and Preference 221. 290–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, Hein. 2010. Pura when we were younger than today. In Artem Fedorchuk & Svetlana Chlenova (eds.), Studia antropologica. A festschrift in honour of Michael Chlenov, 261–283. Jerusalem: Mosty Kul’tury Gesharim.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Hein. & Hendrik D. R. Gomang. 2016. Kamus Blagar-Indonesia-Inggris / Blagar-Indonesian-English dictionary. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.Google Scholar
Stokhof, Wim A. L. 1975. Preliminary notes on the Alor and Pantar languages. Canberra: Research School of Pacific & Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Stutts, Cassie & Aurora Torres. 2012. Taste interacts with sound symbolism. North American Journal of Psychology 14(1). 174–84.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 2017. Sound-symbolism: The role of word sound in meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science 8(5). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarte, Robert D. & Loren S. Barritt. 1971. Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: Three studies. Language and Speech 14(2). 158–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whissel, Cynthia. 1999. Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of different emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills 891. 19–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Phonoemotional profiling: A description of the emotional flavour of English texts on the basis of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills 911. 617–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren, Erik W. Holman & Cecile H. Brown. 2010. Sound symbolism in basic vocabulary. Entropy 121. 844–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemsen, Jeroen. 2016. Field notes on Reta. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
. 2018. Field notes on Reta-Hula. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
. In press. Reta. To appear in Antoinette Schapper (ed.). The Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Sketch grammars, vol. 31. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. Submitted. The sloped world(s) of the Reta language: Grammaticalised expressions of elevation on a micro, meso and macro level. In Carsten Levisen & Susana Fernández (eds.), Language and popular geopolitics. [Special issue]. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics 4.
Yu Cho, Young-mee. 2006. Sound symbolism in Korean. In Ho-min Sohn (ed.), Korean language in culture and society, 64–73. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Malysheva, V. N.
2024. French Loanwords in English cr-phonaesthemic group. Discourse 10:4 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Robbe, Joost & Jeroen Willemsen
2022. Phonaesthemic alternations in Flemish dialects: a matter of language contact in the emergence of phonaesthesia?. Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter
2020. Distant genetic relations: is Basque related to Indo-European?. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Nala H.
2020. Style variation in the second formant. Language Ecology 4:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.