The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size
Phonaesthemic alternations in Reta and in other languages
Phonaesthemes are a common phenomenon, but they are generally not in paradigmatic opposition like morphemes are
(
Svantesson 2017: 6). Reta, however, has a phonaesthemic contrast /l/~/r/, where
/r/-colouring of neutral base words signifies an increase in vulgarity, intensity, size or severity (e.g.
ɓela
‘bad’ vs.
ɓera ‘terrible’, -
ool ‘penis’ vs. -
oor ‘cock’). This paper describes
this phenomenon in detail, and provides a discussion as to whether it is best classified as morphological, phonaesthemic, or
otherwise. We argue that, although some of the cross-linguistic criteria for phonaesthesia exclude phonaesthemic /r/ from being
classified as such, it is not straightforwardly classified as either phonological or morphological. Using
Kwon & Round’s (2015) criteria for phonaesthesia and derivational morphology, we compare Reta
phonaesthemic alternations to similar phenomena in other languages. We argue that such alternations differ fundamentally from both non-alternating phonaesthemes and morphology, and are best construed as a distinct cross-linguistic category.
Keywords: phonaesthemes, sound symbolism, alternation, consonant mutation, Timor-Alor-Pantar languages, Reta, Blagar, derivational morphology, augmentative, foreigner speech, markedness
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A brief overview of Reta
- 3.Phonaesthemic alternations in Reta
- 3.1Form and function
- 3.2Phonaesthemic /r/ outside of alternations
- 4.A tentative explanation for phonaesthemic alternations in Reta
- 5.Is it phonology, morphology, both, or neither?
- 5.1Morphology
- 5.2Phonaesthesia
- 5.3Phonology
- 6.Phonaesthemic alternations are not just phonaesthemes
- 6.1A cross-linguistic overview of phonaesthemic consonant alternations
- 6.2A proposal for the classification of phonaesthemic alternations
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (90)
References
Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism. Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bogoras, Waldemar. 1922. Chuckchee. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages, 631–903. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Böhmerová, Ada. 2011. Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak. A systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis 61. 1–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bond, Oliver. 2019. Canonical typology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 409–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1950. Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 61. 117–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burridge, Kate. & Tonya Stebbins. 2016. For the love of language: An introduction to linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Barry F., John H. Esling & Katie Fraser. 2001. Nuuchahnulth. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(2). 275–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Greville. G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83(8). 8–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Greville. G. 2010. Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3(2). 141–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsen, Hilke. 2017. The two meanings of sound symbolism. Open Linguistics 31. 491–9. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John. R. 1930. Speech. London: Benn’s Sixpenny Library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John. R. 1951. Modes of meaning. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. 190–215.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John. R. 1964. The tongues of men & speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fónagy, Iván. 1963. Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. E. 2006. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 2006. Iconicity. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2nd edn, 457–461. Oxford: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hammarström, H., Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2019. Glottolog 3.4. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala. 1994. Introduction: sound-symbolic processes. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson, & Antoinette Schapper. 2012. The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 51(1). 86–122. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holton, Gary & Laura C. Robinson. 2017. The linguistic position of the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. In Marian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology, 2nd edn, 147–191. Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Imai, Mutsumi, Sotaro Kita, Miho Nagumo, & Hiroyuki Okada. 2008. Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 1091. 54–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobsen, William H. 1969. Origins of the Nootka pharyngeals. International Journal of American Linguistics 351. 125–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Kong-on. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Korean Linguistics 131. 67–75.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klamer, Marian. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78(2). 258–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klamer, Marian. 2016. Field notes on Blagar-Pura. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Kratochvíl, František. 2007. A grammar of Abui. A Papuan language of Alor. Utrecht: LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuehnl, Christina. & Alexandra Mantau. 2013. Same sound, same preferences? Investigating sound symbolism effects in international brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30(4). 417–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kula, Nancy C. 2000. The phonology/morphology interface: Consonant mutations in Bemba. In Helen de Hoop & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2000, 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kwon, Nahyun. 2016. The empirically observed iconicity levels of English phonaesthemes. Public Journal of Semiotics 7(2). 73–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25(1). 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lafitte, Pierre. 1944. Grammaire basque (navarro-labourdin littéraire). Bayonne: Librairie ‘Le Livre’.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langdon, Margaret. 1970. A grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langdon, Margaret. 1971. Sound-symbolism in Yuman languages. In Jesse Sawyer (ed.), Studies in American Indian languages, 149–174. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lo, Lap-Yan, Ho M. Luk & Nigel Thompson. 2017. An investigation of sound-symbolism in the context of tactile feeling. The Journal of General Psychology 144(2). 157–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lockwood, Gwilym, Mark Dingemanse & Peter Hagoort. 2016. Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 42(8). 1274–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magnus, Margaret. 2001. What’s in a word? Studies in phonosemantics. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mannheim, Bruce. 1991. The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: a synchronic-diachronic approach. München: Beck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Samuel E. 1962. Phonetic symbolism in Korean. In Nicholas Poppe (ed.), American studies in Altaic linguistics, 177–89. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCune, Keith M. 1985. The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Jakarta: NUSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B. 1996. Sound symbolism in Gooniyandi, a language of Western Australia. WORD 47(3). 339–364. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merrill, John T. M. 2018. The Historical Origin of Consonant Mutation in the Atlantic Languages. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy (eds.), 2019. PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Mutz, Karin. 2015. Evaluative morphology in a diachronic perspective. In Nicola Grandi & Livia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 142–154. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neisser, Friedrich K. 1953. Studien zur georgischen Wortbildung. Wiesbaden: Steiner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ngo, Mary K., Reeva Misra & Charles Spence. 2011. Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference 221. 567–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Language 47(4). 826–848. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999. The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 281. 225–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rießler, Michael. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Kildin Saami. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 229–244. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oswalt, Robert L. 1994. Introduction: sound-symbolic processes. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 293–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, Laura C. 2010a. Field notes on Reta. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010b. Field notes on Blagar-Bakalang. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010c. Field notes on Blagar-Bama. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010d. Field notes on Blagar-Kulijahi. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010e. Field notes on Blagar-Nule. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010f. Field notes on Blagar-Tuntuli. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Robinson, Laura C. 2010g. Field notes on Blagar-Warsalelang. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Sapir, Edward. 1911. Diminutive and augmentative consonantism in Wishram. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages (Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40, part 1), 638–45. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, Edward. 1958 [1915]. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In David G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, 179–196. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schapper, Antoinette. 2017. Introduction. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.), Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Sketch grammars, vol. 21, 1–54. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shrum, L. J., Tina M. Lowrey, David Luna, Dawn B. Lerman, & Min Liu. 2012. Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 29(3). 275–279.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael. 1994. Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sohn, Ho-min. 1994. Korean. London & New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sohn, Ho-min. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spence, Charles & Alberto Gallace. 2011. Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality and Preference 221. 290–5. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinhauer, Hein. 2010. Pura when we were younger than today. In Artem Fedorchuk & Svetlana Chlenova (eds.), Studia antropologica. A festschrift in honour of Michael Chlenov, 261–283. Jerusalem: Mosty Kul’tury Gesharim.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinhauer, Hein. & Hendrik D. R. Gomang. 2016. Kamus Blagar-Indonesia-Inggris / Blagar-Indonesian-English dictionary. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stokhof, Wim A. L. 1975. Preliminary notes on the Alor and Pantar languages. Canberra: Research School of Pacific & Asian Studies, Australian National University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stutts, Cassie & Aurora Torres. 2012. Taste interacts with sound symbolism. North American Journal of Psychology 14(1). 174–84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 2017. Sound-symbolism: The role of word sound in meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science 8(5). 1–12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarte, Robert D. & Loren S. Barritt. 1971. Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: Three studies. Language and Speech 14(2). 158–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whissel, Cynthia. 1999. Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of different emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills 891. 19–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whissel, Cynthia. 2000. Phonoemotional profiling: A description of the emotional flavour of English texts on the basis of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills 911. 617–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Søren, Erik W. Holman & Cecile H. Brown. 2010. Sound symbolism in basic vocabulary. Entropy 121. 844–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willemsen, Jeroen. 2016. Field notes on Reta. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Willemsen, Jeroen. 2018. Field notes on Reta-Hula. In Gereon A. Kaiping, Owen Edwards & Marian Klamer (eds.), LexiRumah 2.1.2. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 July 2020).
Willemsen, Jeroen. In press. Reta. To appear in Antoinette Schapper (ed.). The Papuan languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar: Sketch grammars, vol. 31. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Willemsen, Jeroen. Submitted. The sloped world(s) of the Reta language: Grammaticalised expressions of elevation on a micro, meso and macro level. In Carsten Levisen & Susana Fernández (eds.), Language and popular geopolitics. [Special issue]. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics 4.
Yu Cho, Young-mee. 2006. Sound symbolism in Korean. In Ho-min Sohn (ed.), Korean language in culture and society, 64–73. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Robbe, Joost & Jeroen Willemsen
2022.
Phonaesthemic alternations in Flemish dialects: a matter of language contact in the emergence of phonaesthesia?.
Folia Linguistica 56:1
► pp. 57 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bakker, Peter
2020.
Distant genetic relations: is Basque related to Indo-European?.
Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130
► pp. 563 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.