Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:4 (2020) ► pp.812830
Aguas, Estrella F.
1968Gudandji. Estrella F. Aguas & Darrel T. Tyron. Papers in Australian Linguistics, Vol. 31, 1–20. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 July 2020).
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M. Dixon
1999Other small families and isolates. In Robert M. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 341–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith
2003Differential Object Marking: iconicity vs economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 211. 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett
2005The syntax morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Alton L. & I. Gusti Ngurah Oka
1974Person in Kawi: exploration of an elementary semantic dimension. Oceanic Linguistics 13(1–2). 229–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, René van den
1989A grammar of the Muna language. Dordrecht & Providence, RI: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
2004 [1994]Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bodomo, Adams
1997The structure of Dagaare. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1979Definite and animate direct objects: a natural class. Linguistica Silesiana 31. 13–21.Google Scholar
1989 [1981]Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, William E. & John R. Ross
1975World order. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San & Timothy J. Vance (eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, 63–111. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1990Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Kari Fraurud
1996Animacy in grammar and discourse. In Thorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility, 47–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
2005The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 91. 77–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forchheimer, Paul
1953The category of person in language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1972Studies in ChiBemba and Bantu grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Haiman, Jon
Hartzler, Margareth
1994Sentani. In Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds.), Typological studies in negation, 51–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. & Greville G. Corbett
1988Resolution rules in Qafar. Linguistics 26(2). 259–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván & Ekaitz Santazilia
2018Asimetrías gramaticales asociadas a la animacidad en la lengua vasca: una perspectiva tipológica. In Joseba A. Lakarra & Blanca Urgell (eds.), Studia diachronica et philologica in honorem Joakin Gorrotxategi: Vasconica et aquitanica, 381–395. Bilbao: UPV/EHU. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván
2005Origen y evolución de la flexión nominal eslava. Bilbao: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ji, Jie & Maocheng Liang
2018An animacy hierarchy within inanimate nouns: English corpus evidence from a prototypical perspective. Lingua 2051. 71–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski
2011Introduction to case, animacy and semantic roles. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2008Animacy effects on differential Goal marking. Linguistic Typology 121. 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Marian & František Kratochvíl
2006The role of animacy in Teiwa and Abui (Papuan). Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 32(2). 59–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju & John Peter Lucius Gwynn
1985A Grammar of modern Telugu. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu & Etsuko Kaburaki
1975Empathy and syntax. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard studies in syntax and semantics, Vol. 11, 1–73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 21. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marlett, Stephen A.
2010Personal pronouns: inventory. In Cheryl A. Black, H. Andrew Black & Stephen A. Marlett (eds.), The Zapotec grammar files. Mexico DF: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 July 2020).
Ortmann, Albert
1998The role of [±animate] in inflection. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann & Teresa Parodi (eds.), Models of inflection, 60–84. Tübingen: Max Nyermeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Press, Ian
1986A Grammar of modern Breton. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1982The sound of meaning. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 275–290. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Santazilia, Ekaitz
2013Noun morphology. In Mikel Martínez-Areta (ed.), Basque and Proto-Basque: Language-internal and typological approaches to linguistic reconstruction, 223–281. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2019Animacy effects in inflectional morphology: A typological survey. Vitoria-Gasteiz: University of the Basque Country PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoniette
2009Bunaq: A Papuan language of Central Timor. Canberra: The Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Ana
2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, T. Cedric
1974The plurality split. Chicago Linguistic Society 101. 657–661.Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrin & Laure Gardelle
2018Anthropocentrism, egocentrism and the notion of Animacy Hierarchy. In Sandrin Sorlin & Laure Gardelle (eds.), From culture to language and back: The Animacy Hierarchy in language and discourse. Special issue of the International Journal of Language and Culture 5(2), 133–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Swart, Peter de & Helen de Hoop
2018Shifting animacy. Theoretical Linguistics 44(1–2). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swart, Peter de, Monique Lamers Lamers & Sander Lestrade
2008Animacy, argument structure, and argument encoding. Lingua 118(2). 131–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verma, Manindra K.
2003Bhojpuri. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 515–537. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watters, James K.
1988Topics in Tepehua grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay J.
1997Introduction to typology. The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Mutsumi