It has been claimed by Hasegawa, Yoshimura, Nishigauchi, Kikuchi, Saito and Watanabe, among others, that Japanese observes subjacency in relative clause formation, question formation, topicalization, comparative deletion (all non-overt operator movements), PP-topicalization, and scrambling (overt movements). In this paper I present counterexamples to each of these claims and argue that an aboutness condition on topic-comment and focus-comment constructions not only better explains the data but also explains the fact that subjects are usually easier to relativize than non-subjects, the fact that NP-topicalization is more free than PP-topicalization and the fact that there is pressure for a "list" interpretation in multiple wh-questions.
2022. Korean Relative Clauses: Metonymy, Zone Activation, and Reference Point*. Studia Linguistica 76:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
CHEN, JIDONG & YASUHIRO SHIRAI
2015. The acquisition of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 42:2 ► pp. 394 ff.
Kim, Ilkyu
2013. Rethinking “island effects” in Korean relativization. Language Sciences 38 ► pp. 59 ff.
Nakamura, Michiko & Edson T. Miyamoto
2013. The object before subject bias and the processing of double-gap relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
Ozeki, Hiromi & Yasuhiro Shirai
2007. DOES THE NOUN PHRASE ACCESSIBILITY HIERARCHY PREDICT THE DIFFICULTY ORDER IN THE ACQUISITION OF JAPANESE RELATIVE CLAUSES?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29:02
Xu, Liejiong
2006. Topicalization in Asian Languages. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 137 ff.
Xu, Liejiong
2017. Topicalization in Asian Languages. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Comrie, Bernard & Anna Giacalone Ramat
2002. Typology and language acquisition: the case of relative clauses. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition,
[no author supplied]
2006. Consolidated References. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 439 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.