Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 20:1 (1996) ► pp.196–207
Book review

Ljiljana Progovac. Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 68]. Cambridge: University Press, 1994. ISBN 0 521 4480 2

Reviewed by
| University of Groningen
Published online: 1 January 1996
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.1.10hoe
References (25)
References
Baker, C. Lee. 1970, “Double negatives”, Linguistic Inquiry 11, pp. 169–186.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerry A. 1983, “Polarized Auxiliaries”, in: F. Heny and B. Richards. eds., Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, 1978, “Implication Reversal in a Natural Language”. In F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt. eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993, A Typological Study of Indefinite Pronouns, dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack, 1983, ‘Negative Polarity and the Comparative’, in: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1–31, pp. 403–434.Google Scholar
, 1994, “A semantic argument for complex predicates”, to appear in the proceedings of SALT IV.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric. 1991, Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1969, “A presuppositional analysis of only and even ”, CLS 51, pp. 98–107.Google Scholar
1989, A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT-Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kas, Mark. 1993, Essays on Boolean Functions and Negative Polarity, doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964, “Negation in English”, in J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz. eds., The Structure of Language, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 246–323.Google Scholar
Labov, William, 1972, “Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar”, in Language 481, pp. 773–818.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
1980, “On the notion affective in the analysis of negative polarity items”. Journal of Linguistic Research 1–11, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990, Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections, disseration, MIT.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and J. Uriagereka. 1988, A course on GB syntax. MIT-Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. and Edward S. Klima. 1963, “Rules for English Pronominalization”, Language 391, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Linebarger, Marcia. 1981, The Grammar of Negative Polarity, dissertation MIT, published by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
. 1987, “Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation”, Linguistics and Philosophy 101, pp. 325–387.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967, Constraints on Variables in Syntax, dissertation MIT.Google Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton. 1994, Negative Contexts, dissertation University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991, Syntactic properties of sentential negation. A comparative study of Romance languages. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans, 1986, “Polariteit: De reikwijdte van een lexicale eigenschap”, C. Hoppenbrouwers, I. Schuurman, R. van Zonneveld and F. Zwarts. eds., Syntaxis en Lexicon, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 157–192.Google Scholar
, 1993, “Three types of polarity”, to appear in F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs. eds., Semantics.Google Scholar