Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 20:1 (1996) ► pp.236243
References
Biber, D.
(1988): Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, G.
(1982): Kohärenz. Grundfragen der linguistischen Kommunikationsanalyse. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Grimes, J.
(1975): The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hundsnurscher, F.
(1980): “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik“. In: Rupp, H./Roloff, H. -G. (eds): Akten des VI. lnternationalen Germanisten-Kongresses. Basel 1980 Teil 2. Bern: Lang, 89–95.Google Scholar
(1992): “Does a dialogical view of language amount to a paradigm change in linguistics: language as dialogue“. In: Stati, S./Weigand, E. (eds): Methodologie der Dialoganalyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1–14.Google Scholar
Mann, W./Matthiessen, C./Thompson, S.
(1982): Rhetorical structures report. Ms.Google Scholar
McKeown, K.
(1982): Generating natural language text in response to questions about database structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Sacks, H./Schegloff, E./Jefferson, G.
(1974): “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation“. Language 501, 696–735.Google Scholar
Stati, S.
(1990): Le transphrastique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
(1985): “Introduction: Levels and dimensions of discourse analysis“. In: van Dijk, T. A. (ed.): Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. II1. London etc.: Academic Press, 1–11.Google Scholar
Weigand, E.
(1989): Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1991): “The dialogic principle revisited. Speech acts and mental states“. In: Stati, S./Weigand, E./Hundsnurscher, F. (eds): Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990 Part 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 75–104.Google Scholar
(1993): “Mündlich und schriftlich – ein Verwirrspiel“. In: Löftier, H. (ed.): Dialoganalyse IV. Referate der 4. Arbeitstagung, Basel 1992 Part 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 137–150.Google Scholar
(1995): “Looking for the point of the dialogic turn“. In: Hundsnurscher, F./Weigand, E. (eds): Future perspectives of dialogue analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 95–120.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Weigand, Edda
2021. Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 11:3  pp. 457 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.