Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 20:2 (1996) ► pp.443–454
Book review

Henk J. Verkuyk. A Theory of Aspectuality. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 64]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 393 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Texas at Austin
Published online: 1 January 1996
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.2.08kri
References (17)
References
Bennett, Michael & Barbara Partee. 1972. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bunt, Harry. 1985. Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garey, H. B. 1957. “Verbal Aspects in French”. Language 331, 91–110.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Erhard. 1985. A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Horn, Larry. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans. 1981. “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, Jansen, T. M. V. & Stokhof, M. J. B. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language (Mathematical Centre Tracts 136, I1). Amsterdam. 277–322.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massnenomina, Pluralausdrücken und Aspektklassen. München: Fink.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution“. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. Structures for Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Leisi, Ernst. 1953. Der Wortinhalt. Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen. Heidelberg: Quelle und Mayer.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach“. In R. Bäuerle, Chr. Schwarze & A. V. Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 302–323.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 1982. “On the Difference between eating and eating something: Activities versus Accomplishments. Linguistic Inquiry 131, 113–121.Google Scholar
Oversteegen, Eleonoor. 1989. Tracking Time. A Proposal for the Representation of Temporal Expressions in Dutch. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspect and Aktionsarten. A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
White, M. 1994. A Computational Approach to Aspectual Composition. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia.Google Scholar