Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 47:2 (2023) ► pp.243–290

Spatial prepositions min and ʕan in Traditional Negev Arabic

| Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
| Tel Aviv University
The Arabic prepositions min and ʕan in their prototypical spatial use relate to the Source domain, translating as ‘(away) from’. In many contemporary dialects ʕan is absent or limited to secondary, non-spatial meanings. In Traditional Negev Arabic, however, both prepositions are used complementarily. The proto-scene of ablative min is a Figure (F) exiting from a 3-dimensional Ground (G)-source, with ‘containment’ and ‘boundary-crossing’ typical components of the scene. The preposition ʕan prototypically fulfils a separative function, denoting separation from a Source with no relevance to dimensions, and has developed secondary modal functions. Both also have perlative functions and may appear in static scenes. Only min heads prepositional complexes, where it typically restores the nominal origin of the following element as a bounded region. So ‘min behind the house’ may denote ‘in the back zone of the house’; these complexes characterize multiple axes, when F crosses G’s path.
Keywords: spatial prepositions, Source domain, Figure-Ground relations, proto-scene, semantic maps, ablative, perlative, partitive, allative, separative, boundary-crossing, multiple axis scenes, Traditional Negev Arabic, Classical Arabic, relexification
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Prepositions and proto-scenes
  • 2.Research on Classical Arabic prepositions
    • a.Primary/Secondary
    • b.Concrete/Abstract
    • c.Source/Goal/Path
  • 3.Source preposition min
    • 3.1 min in research literature
    • 3.2 min in our proto-scene model
    • 3.3Compounding min
  • 4.Source preposition ʕan
    • 4.1The preposition ʕan in grammarians’ descriptions
    • 4.2The preposition ʕan in our proto-scene model
    • 4.3The compound min ʕan
  • 5.Overlap, differentiation and dialectal development
    • 5.1Overlap and differentiation
    • 5.2The prepositions min and ʕan in Modern Arabic dialects and in dialectal research
  • 6.The present study
    • 6.1Preliminary dialectal survey
    • 6.2Traditional Negev Arabic and its spatial language
    • 6.3Methodological background
    • 6.4Corpus
    • 6.5Experimental methodology
    • 6.6The stimuli
      • Series α
      • Series β
      • Series γ
    • 6.7Further stimuli: The Tick Test Series
    • 6.8Spontaneous discourse data
    • 6.9The informants
    • 6.10Presentation of findings
      • a.Corpus (C) examples
      • b.Experimental (E) examples
      • c.Spontaneous (S) discourse examples
  • 7.The preposition min: Simplex and compounding
    • 7.1Proto-scene: Boundary-crossing
      • 7.1.1Simplex boundary-crossing min
      • 7.1.2Compounding boundary-crossing min
      • 7.1.3Does the wadi have a ‘heart’?
      • 7.1.4Boundary-crossing min ʕind
    • 7.2Ablative min for Source
      • 7.2.1Simplex ablative min
      • 7.2.2Compound ablative min ʕind
      • 7.2.3Simplex and compound allative prepositions
    • 7.3Perlative min for Path
      • 7.3.1Simplex perlative min for boundary-crossing
      • 7.3.2Simplex perlative min for passing by, along or across
      • 7.3.3Compounding perlative min ʕind
      • 7.3.4The prepositions giddām, wara and janb in simplex and compound Path phrases
    • 7.4Stative min for location
      • 7.4.1Stative min-adverbials
      • 7.4.2Stative min-compounds
    • 7.5Adverbial min-chains
      • 7.5.1 F min G w ADV
      • 7.5.2 F ʕind G min ADV
    • 7.6Summary of spatial min
  • 8.Findings for ʕin
    • 8.1Proto-scene: Distancing ʕin
    • 8.2Distancing ʕin followed by a min-phrase
    • 8.3Perlative ʕin
    • 8.4Stative ʕin
    • 8.5Modal ʕin
  • 9.The adverbial ‘there’ with min and ʕin
  • 10.Summary, conclusions, and further research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 7 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20053.hen
References (53)
References
Abdel Nasser & Mohamed Manal. 2013. The polysemous nature of some Arabic prepositions. International Journal of Linguistics 5(2). 66–86.Google Scholar
Alatamin, Mohammad. 2011. Ethnographic and linguistic aspects of the Negev Arabic Lexicon. Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev PhD Dissertation [in Hebrew].
Ambros, Arne. 1982. Beobachtungen zu den arabischen Präpositionen min und ʕan . Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 741. 95–102.Google Scholar
Bar-Zvi, Sasson. 1991. The jurisdiction among the Negev Bedouins. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence, Israel [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Brockelmann, Carl. 1961. (1908–1913). Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen. Vol. 11. 1908; Vol. 21 1913. Hildesheim: George Olms.Google Scholar
. 1960. Arabische Grammatik: Paradigmen, Literatur, Übungsstücke und Glossar. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Brockett, Adrian A. 1985. The spoken Arabic of Khābūra on the Bāṭina of Oman. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Buckley, Ron. 2007. Modern literary Arabic. A reference grammar. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia. 2015. Object-based selection of spatial frames of reference in aṣ-Ṣāniʕ Arabic (Studi Linguistici Pisani 7). Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
. 2020. The Aṣ-Ṣāniʕ Arabic Prepositions min and ʕin: Syntax, Semantics, and Cognition. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia & Roni Henkin. 2016. Spatial language and culture: Cardinal directions in Negev Arabic. Anthropological Linguistics 58(2). 171–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Referential complementarity in Traditional Negev Arabic. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 101. 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti, Luz & Silvia Luraghi. 2014. The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Rudolf Eric. 2000. A grammar of the Bedouin Dialects of the Northern Sinai littoral: Bridging the linguistic gap between the Eastern and Western Arab world. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elihai, Yohanan. 1999. Arabic-Hebrew dictionary for spoken Arabic. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence Publishing House and Knesset Publishing House [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Esseesy, Mohseen. 2010. Grammaticalization of Arabic prepositions and subordinators. A corpus-based study. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 2002. Grammatik des Klassischen Arabisch. 3rd edn. Porta Linguarum Orientalium. Neue Serie Band 2. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gesenius, Wilhelm. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew grammar. Emil Kautzsch (ed.). Oxford: Calderon Press.Google Scholar
Ginat, Joseph. 2000. Blood revenge: Outcasts, mediation, and family honor. Haifa: Haifa University Press and Zmora-Bitan [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Haywood, John & Haim Musa Nahmad. 1962. A new Arabic grammar. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co.Google Scholar
Henkin, Roni. 2010. Negev Arabic: Dialectal, sociolinguistic, and stylistic variation (Semitica Viva Series no. 48). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(unpublished). Corpus of Negev Arabic.
Holes, Clive. 1990. Gulf Arabic. London: New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. Dialect, culture and society in Eastern Arabia. Vol. 11: Glossary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2018. Arabic historical dialectology: Linguistic and sociolinguistic approaches. Vol. 301. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1987. ‘Source’ vs. ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Rene Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2012. Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between Source and Goal paths. Cognitive Science 36(3). 517–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, Edward William. 1968 (1863–1893). An Arabic-English lexicon. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 11: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2009. A model for representing polysemy: The Italian preposition da . In Jacques François, Eric Gilbert, Claude Guimier & Maxi Krause (eds.), Actes du Colloque “Autour de la préposition”, 167–178. Caen: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä. 2014. The typology and diachrony of partitives. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Heiko Narrog. 2014. Perspectives on semantic roles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi. 2017. Space in diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1978. Ablative-locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case grammar. Journal of Linguistics 141: 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
al-Munjid. 1992. al-Munjid fī al-luġa wa-l-ʔaʕlām. Beirut: Dar el-machreq Sarl Pubishers. [In Arabic.]Google Scholar
Nishio, Tetsuo. 1996. Where does the Wadi come from? The cognitive space of the Sinaitic Bedouin. In: Shun Sato & Eisei Kurimoto (eds.), Essays in Northeast African Studies (SENRI Ethnological Studies 43), 189–206. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Palva, Hekki. 1991. Is there a North West Arabian dialect group?. In: Martin Forstner (ed.), Festgabe für Hans-Rudolf Singer, 151–166. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Procházka, Stephan. 1993. Die Präpositionen in den Neuarabischen Dialekten. Wien: VWGÖGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Prepositions. In: Kees Versteegh (Gen. ed.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (EALL), Vol. 21, 699–703. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Prochazka, Theodore. 1998. Saudi Arabian Dialects. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, Judith. 1984. The Bedouin Arabic dialects. General problems and a close analysis of North Israel Bedouin dialects. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rossi, Ettore. 1953. L’arabo parlato a Ṣanʕā. Roma: Istituto per l’Oriente.Google Scholar
Shawarbah, Musa. 2007. Ha-dialekt ha-bedui šel ha-Tiyāha ba-Negev (The Bedouin Dialect of the Tiyāha in the Negev: Phonology, Morphology and Some Selected Syntactic Issues). Jerusalem: Hebrew University PhD dissertation.
. 2012. A grammar of Negev Arabic: Comparative studies, texts and glossary in the Bedouin Dialect of the ʕAzāzmih tribe. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde. 2004. The Goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), The Goal bias in the encoding of motion events, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stewart, Frank H. 1990. Texts in Sinai Bedouin Law. Part 21 (Mediterranean Language and Culture Monograph Series 5). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Griffithes Wheeler. 1927. Arabic grammar of the written language. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans. 2003. The semantics of English prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Rainer Maria. 1999. Die Präpositionen im Semitischen: Über Morphologisierungsprozesse im Semitischen. In: Lutz Edzard & Mohammed Nekroumi (eds.), Tradition and innovation: Norm and deviation in Arabic and Semitic linguistics, 22–43 Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Watson, Janet. 2000. Wasf Ṣanʕāˀ: Texts in Ṣanʕānī Arabic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wehr, Hans. 1976. A dictionary of modern written Arabic. 3rd edn. (Edited by J. Milton Cowan). Ithaca: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar
Wright, William. 1975. A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar