Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 47:1 (2023) ► pp.190241
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2007Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Arthur J., Frances Berdan & James Lockhart
(eds.) 1976Beyond the codices. The Nahua view of colonial Mexico. Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrason, Alexander
2010Expressions of futurity in the Vilamovicean language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 401. 1–11.Google Scholar
2011The Vilamovicean passive. Linguistica Copernicana 51. 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014aThe Polish component in the Vilamovicean language. GLOSSOS 121. 1–38.Google Scholar
2014bMorphological case systems of the Vilamovicean noun – from the 20th to the 21st century. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9(1). 1–19Google Scholar
2016aA complex system of complex predicates: Tense, taxis, aspect and mood in Basse Mandinka from a grammaticalization and cognitive perspective. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University PhD Dissertation.
2016bModern Vilamovicean – complex decay of a case system. Oxford German Studies 45(2). 212–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Polish borrowings in Wymysorys: A formal linguistic analysis of Germano-Slavonic language contact in Wilamowice. Reykjavík: University of Iceland PhD dissertation.
Forthcoming. Complexity of severely endangered minority languages – the case of Wymysorys. In Matt Coler & Andrew Nevins eds. Contemporary research in minority and diaspora languages of Europe Berlin Language Science Press
Andrason, Alexander & Tymoteusz Król
2014aA fuzzy model of the Vilamovicean language. Sorbian Revue 481. 265–292.Google Scholar
2014bA contribution to the documentation of a nearly extinct language – Present Tense morphology in Modern Vilamovicean. Studia Linguistica (University of Wrocław) 331. 7–22.Google Scholar
2014cPronominal system of Modern Vilamovicean. Brünner Beiträge zur Germanistik und Nordistik 281. 93–122.Google Scholar
2016aA note on the morphology of the Vilamovicean verb – principal parts. Language Documentation and Description 131. 1–22.Google Scholar
2016bA grammar of Wymysorys. Durham: Duke University, SEELRC.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. Richard
2003Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Revised edition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter
1986Structural change in language obsolescence: Some eastern Australian examples. Australian Journal of Linguistics 61. 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter & Julia Sallabank
2011Introduction. In Peter Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auyang, Sunny
1998Foundations of complex-system theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastardas-Boada, Albert
2014Cap a la ‘complèxica’ com a transdisciplina. In Antònia Martí & Mariona Taulé (eds.), Homenatge a Sebastià Serrano, 63–77. Barcelona: Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2019From language shift to language revitalization and sustainability. A complexity approach to linguistic ecology. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Benecke, Georg, Wilhelm Müller & Friedrich Zarncke
1990 [1854–1866]Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Stuttgard: Hirzel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, Mark
2011Systems and process metaphysics. In Cliff Hooker (ed.), Philosophy of complex systems, 91–104. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boor, Helmut de & Roswitha Wisniewski
1973Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Terrence Kaufman & Thomas Smith-Stark
1986Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62(3). 530–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. Joe & Frances Karttunen
1989Foundation course in Nahuatl grammar. 21 Vols. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Canger, Una
1988Nahuatl dialectology: A survey and some suggestions. International Journal of American Linguistics 541. 28–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carochi, S. J. Horacio
2001 (1645)Grammar of the Mexican language with an explanation of its adverbs. Translated and edited with commentary by James Lockhart. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chicontepec
2014Audio recording. Interview conducted by Eduardo de la Cruz Cruz in the municipality of Chicontepec, Veracruz, September 2014.Google Scholar
Chimalpahin Quauhtlehuanitzin, Don Domingo de San Antón Muñón
2006 (1608–1615)Annals of his time. Edited and translated by James Lockhart, Susan Schroeder, and Doris Namala. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chromik, Bartłomiej
2019Mikro- i makroideologie językowe. Przykład języka wilamowskiego. Warsaw: University of Warsaw dissertation.
Cilliers, Paul
1998Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cilliers, Paul, Harry Biggs, Sonja Blignaut, Aiden Choles, Jan-Hendrik Hofmeyer, Graham Jewitt & Dirk Roux
2013Complexity, modeling, and natural resource management. Ecology and Society 18(3). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Testing the assumption of complexity invariance: the case of Elfdalian and Swedish. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 50–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dakin, Karen
1996El náhuatl de las Memorias: los rasgos de una lingua franca indígena. In Karen Dakin & Cristopher H. Lutz (eds.), Nuestro pesar, nuestra aflicción, tunetuliniliz, tucucuca, 167–189. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
2010Lenguas francas y lenguas locales en la época prehispánica. In Rebeca Barriga Villanueva & Pedro Martin Butragueño (eds.), Historia sociolingüística de México. Vol. 11, 161–183. Mexico: Colegio de Mexico.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2009Overall complexity – a wild goose chase? In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 243–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy
1978The fate of morphological complexity in language death: Evidence from East Gaelic. Language 54(3). 590–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980Language shift in community and individual: The phenomenon of the laggard semi-speaker. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 251. 85–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
2011Early linguistic indicators of language decay. In Emanuele Miola & Paolo Ramat, (eds.), Language contact and language decay: Socio-political and linguistic perspectives, 89–108. Pavia: IUSS Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Bruce
1999Syntactic measures of complexity. Manchester: University of Manchester PhD dissertation.
Filipović, Luna & Martin Pütz
2016Introduction. Endangered languages and languages in danger. In Luna Filipović & Martin Pütz (eds.), Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores Farfán, José Antonio
1999Cuatreros somos y Toindioma hablamos. Contactos y conflictos entre el náhuatl y el español en el sur de México. Tlalpan, D.F.: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Flores Farfán, José Antonio & Justyna Olko
2020Types of communities and speakers. In Justyna Olko & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Revitalizing endangered languages. A practical guide, 75–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gärtner et al.
2006–2019 = Gärtner, Kurt, Klaus Grubmüller, Jens Haustein & Karl Stackmann 2006–2019 Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Stuttgard: Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray
1995What is complexity? Complexity 1(1). 16–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray & Seth Lloyd
2004Effective complexity. In Murray Gell-Mann & Constantino Tsallis (eds.), Nonextensive entropy – Interdisciplinary applications, 387–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinevald Craig, Colette
1998Language contact and language degeneration. In: Floriam Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolingusitics, 257–270. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette & Michel Bert
2011Speakers and communities. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, 45–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald
2008Complexity in numeral systems with an investigation into pidgins and creoles. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 287–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Shirley Brice
1972Telling tongues: Language policy in Mexico, colony to nation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hennings, Thordis
2012Einführung in das Mittelhochdeutsche. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane & Kenneth C. Hill
1986Speaking Mexicano: Dynamics of syncretic language in Central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Cliff
2011Introduction to philosophy of complex systems: A. In Cliff Hooker (ed.), Philosophy of complex systems, 3–90. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ixhuatlán de Madero
1985Audio recording. Chicomexochitl, story 107. From Sandstrom and Sandstrom (1985–98). “Nahuatl Collection of Alan and Pamela Sandstrom” [myths, stories, chants, and other narratives recorded in northern Veracruz, Mexico]. The Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America, LLILAS Benson Latin American Studies and Collections, University of Texas at Austin. Available after free registration at [URL].
Jones, Howard & Martin Jones
2019The Oxford guide to Middle High German. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Frances
1992An analytical dictionary of Nahuatl. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Key, Harold & Mary Ritchie de Key
1953Vocabulario Mejicano de la Sierra de Zacapoaxtla, Puebla. México: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Köbler, Gerhard
2014Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. [URL] (last access 16 February 2022).
Król, T.
2018Powojenne wywózki i wysiedlenia: Przypadek Wilamowic. Warsaw: University of Warsaw MA thesis.
Kusters, Wouter
2003Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2008Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Launey, Michel
2011An introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Translated and adapted by Christopher Mackey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2015The construction ‘sein’ (‘be’) + infinitive from Old High German to New High German. In Michail L. Kotin & Richard Whitt (eds.), To be or not to be? The verbum substantivum from synchronic, diachronic and typological perspectives, 123–141. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Kaj B.
1980Mittelhochdeutsch. In Hans P. Althaus, Helmut Henne & Herbert E. Wiegand (eds.), Lexikon der Germanistischen Linguistik. Vol. III1, 580–584. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lindström, Eva
2008Language complexity and interlinguistic difficulty. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 217–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, James
1992The Nahuas after the conquest. A social and cultural history of the Indians of Central Mexico, sixteenth through eighteenth centuries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lockhart, James, Frances Berdan & Arthur J. O. Anderson
(eds.) 1986The Tlaxcalan actas. A compendium of the records of the Cabildo of Tlaxcala (1545–1627). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William B.
1968Historical German syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
2005Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Oh nɔɔ!: a bewilderingly multifunctional Saramaccan word teaches us how a creole language develops complexity. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 141–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Xia Hua, Cassandra Algy & Lindell Bromham
2019Birth of a contact language did not favor simplification. Language 95(2). 294–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, Joan Swann, Ana Deumert & Williams L. Leap
2009Introducing sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2006On the feasibility of complexity metrics. In Krista Kerge & Maria-Maren Sepper (eds.), Finest linguistics: Proceedings of the Annual Finnish and Estonian Conference of Linguistics, Tallinn, May 6–7, 2004, 11–26. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press.Google Scholar
2008Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Implicational hierarchies and grammatical complexity. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 80–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie
2009Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molina, P. Fr. Alonso de
1880 (1555–1571)Vocabulario de la lengua mexicana. Edición facsimilaria publicada por Julio Platzmann. Leipsig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher
2010Atlas of the world’s languages in danger. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
Neels, Rinaldo
2016Language and identity in Wilamowice: A complex history of language choices and language attitudes. In Justyna Olko, Tomasz Wicherkiewicz & Robert Borges (eds.), Integral Strategies for Language Revitalization, 111–130. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.Google Scholar
Ness, Silke van
1990Changes in an obsolescing language: Pennsylvania German in West Virginia. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. & Laurel B. Preston
2014Introduction. In Frederick J. Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds.). Measuring grammatical complexity, 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nutini, Hugo H. & Barry L. Isaac
2009Social stratification in Central Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ocotepec
1638Conjunto de testamentos en lengua náhuatl. Biblioteca Nacional de Antropología e Historia (México). Tercera serie, papeles sueltos, registro número 9 caja 7, legajo 28, f.35r-v.Google Scholar
Olko, Justyna
2018Unbalanced language contact and the struggle for survival: Bridging diachronic and synchronic perspectives on Nahuatl. European Review 26(1). 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Language attitudes and educational opportunities: Challenging a history of oppression and assimilation among Indigenous communities in Mexico. Dutkansearvvi dieđalaš áigečála / Journal of the Sámi Language and Culture Research Association 11. 1–37.Google Scholar
Olko, Justyna & Agnieszka Brylak
2018Defending local autonomy and facing cultural trauma: A Nahua order against idolotry, Tlaxcala 1543. Hispanic American Historical Review 98(4). 573–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olko, Justyna & John Sullivan
2014Toward a comprehensive model for Nahuatl research and revitalization. Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 7–9, 2014, 369–397. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Bridging gaps and empowering native speakers: An inclusive, partnership-based approach to Nahuatl research and revitalization. In Justyna Olko, Tomasz Wicherkiewicz & Robert Borges (eds.), Integral strategies for language revitalization, 347–385. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Olko, Justyna, John Sullivan & Jan Szemińsk
(eds.) 2018Dialogue with Europe, dialogue with the past. Colonial Nahua and Quechua elites in their own words. Louisville: University of Colorado Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palosaari, Noami & Lyle Campbell
2011Structural aspects of language endangerment. In Peter Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, 100–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
2007Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. 25th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pharao Hansen, Magnus
2014The East-West split in Nahuan dialectology: Reviewing the evidence and consolidating the grouping. Conference paper presented at Friends of Uto-Aztecan Annual Meeting , Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico .
Pizzigoni, Caterina
ed. 2007Testaments of Toluca. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes García, Luis
2001¿Cómo te confundes? ¿Acaso somos conquistados? Anales de Juan Bautista. México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Sahagún, Fray Bernardino de
1982Florentine Codex. Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España. Translated from the Aztec, with notes and illustrations by Charles E. Dibble and Arthur J. O. Anderson. Santa Fe: The School of American Research and the University of Utah.Google Scholar
Sallabank, Julia
2012Diversity and language policy for endangered languages. In Bernard Spolsky (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy, 100–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Attitudes to endangered languages: Identities and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Hans U.
2017Einführung in die deutsche Sprachgeschichte. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwaller, John
2012The expansion of Nahuatl as a Lingua Franca among priests in sixteenth-century Mexico. Ethnohistory 59(4). 675–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Barry D., Louise M. Burkhart & Elizabeth R. Wright
2008Nahuatl theater. Volume 31: Spanish Golden Age drama in Mexican translation. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Shalizi, Cosma R.
2006Methods and techniques of complex science: An overview. arXiv:nlin/0307015v4 [nlin.AO]. In Thomas S. Deisboeck & J. Yasha Kresh (eds.), Complex systems science in biomedicine, 33–114. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2008Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 67–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Complexity in core argument marking and population size. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 126–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011Language universals and linguistic complexity: Three case studies in core argument marking. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
Sonderegger, Stefan
1979Grundzüge deutscher Sprachgeschichte: Einführung, Genealogie, Konstanten. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John, Eduardo de la Cruz Cruz, Abelardo de la Cruz de la Cruz, Delfina de la Cruz de la Cruz, Victoriano de la Cruz Cruz, Sabina Cruz de la Cruz, Ofelia Cruz Morales, Catalina Cruz de la Cruz & Manuel de la Cruz Cruz
2016Tlahtolxitlauhcayotl: Chicontepec, Veracruz (Totlahtol Series). Warsaw: IDIEZ/University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre
2007Two key concepts of language endangerment: Language obsolescence and language death. Linguistica 47(1). 21–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tepoztlan
c. 1540Biblioteka Jagellońska in Kraków, Ms. Amer. 3.Google Scholar
Townsend, Camilla
(ed.) 2010Here in this year. Seventeenth-century Nahuatl annals of the Tlaxcala-Puebla valley. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO
2003Language vitality and endangerment. UNESCO ad hoc expert group on endangered languages document adopted by the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages Paris, 10–12 March 2003, [URL] (last access 16 February 2022).
Villavicencio Zarza, Frida
2010Entre una realidad plurilingüe y un anhelo de nación. Apuntespara un estudio sociolingüístico del siglo XIX. In Rebeca Barriga Villanueva & Pedro Martín Butragueño (eds.), Historia sociolingüística de México. Vol. 21, 713–793. Mexico: Colegio de Mexico.Google Scholar
Vocabulario Trilingüe
c. 1540Newberry Library (Chicago), Ayer Collection, MS 1478.Google Scholar
Wicherkiewicz, Tomasz, Tymoteusz Król & Justyna Olko
2018Awakening the language and speakers’ community of Wymysiöeryś. European Review 26(1). 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wicherkiewicz, Tomasz & Justyna Olko
2016Researching, documenting and reviving Wymysiöeryś: A historical outline. In Justyna Olko, Tomasz Wicherkiewicz & Robert Borges (eds.), Integral strategies for language revitalization, 17–53. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Wicherkiewicz, Tomasz
2003The making of a language. The case of the idiom of Wilamowice (Southern Poland). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1917Middle High German primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zapata y Mendoza, Juan Buenaventura
1995 (1662–1692)História cronológica de la Noble Ciudad de Tlaxcala. Transcripción paleográfica, traducción, presentación y notas de Luis Reyes García y Andrea Martínez Baracs. Tlaxcala: Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, CIESAS.Google Scholar