Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 21:1 (1997) ► pp.228–236
Book review

William Labov. Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, USA: Blackwell, 1994. xix + 641 pp. ISBN 0-631-17914-3 . [Language in Society, 20].

Reviewed by
| Stanford University
| Stanford University
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.1.17clo
References (20)
References
Anttila, Arto. 1995. “Internal and external factors in language change”. MS, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan; Perkins, Revere; and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. “Competing motivations”. In: Haiman, John (ed.), I conicity in syntax, 343–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1988. “Sound change and adolescent social structure”. Language in Society 171: 183–207.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, Marinel; and Stein, Dieter. 1992. “On “internal” and “external” in syntactic change”. In: Gerritsen, Marinel; and Stein, Dieter (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 1–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1975. “Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo”. In: Li, Charles (ed.), Word order and word order change, 47–112. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1993. “Functional constraints on linguistic variation”. MS, York University (revised version forthcoming in Gregory R. Guy. Language variation and linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd; and Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.; and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge (trans. by Brigitte Nerlich).Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989a. “Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do ”. In: Fasold, Ralph W.; and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language variation and change, 133–72. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
1989b. “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change.” Language Variation and Change 11: 199–244.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1981. “Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy.” Language 571: 267–309.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “Syntactic reanalysis”. In: Li, Charles N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change”. Lingua e Stile 201: 303–18.Google Scholar
. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa. (originally published as Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 481].)Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of syntactic change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1968. “The inflectional paradigm as an occasional determinant of sound change”. In: Lehmann, W. P.; and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 21–64. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel; Labov, William; and Herzog, Marvin I. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In: Lehmann, W. P.; and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar