Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 47:2 (2023) ► pp.463504
References
Allerton, David John. & Alan Cruttenden
1979Three reasons for accenting a definite subject. Journal of Linguistics 15(1). 49–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
2015Pronominal datives: The royal road to argument status. Studies in Language 39(2). 257–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker & Ariel
submitted. Scaffolding the sentential Ultimate construction into a word
Bauer, Laurie
1983English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Israela & Rachel Giora
2018The Defaultness Hypothesis: A quantitative corpus-based study of non/default sarcasm and literalness production. Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
2008Constructions and language change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
1980The case of an (S)VO language: Subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language 56(4). 759–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas
2001Pathways of lexicalization. In Wolfgang Raible, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König & Wulf Oesterreicher (eds.), Language universals and language typology, 1596–1608. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cheryl
1983Topic continuity in written English narrative. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 313–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2003Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, Vol. II1, 145–167. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1974Language and consciousness. Language 50(1). 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
2018Grammaticalization meets construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Kari Fraurud
1996Animacy in grammar and discourse. In Thorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility, 47–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dattner, Elitzur
2008Lower Transitivity Constructions in Hebrew: The Case of Motion Verbs. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University MA thesis.
2019The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics 57(5). 1073–1110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In Doris Schönefeld (ed.), Special Volume 1 of Constructions: Constructions all over – Case studies and theoretical implications. Available at: [URL] (last access 30 August 2022).
Divjak, Dagmar
2010Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Laura A. Janda
2008Ways of attenuating agency in Russian. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2). 138–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubnov, Keren
2005ašem ha-to’ar be-tafkid HGM ba-ʕivrit ha-xadaša be-rešita (Adjectives functioning as impersonals (Ḥagam) in early Modern Hebrew). In Tamar Alexander, Josef Tobi, Dan Laor, Ziva Amishai-Maisels & Ora Schwartzwald (eds.), Iggud: Selected Essays in Jewish Studies, 31–40. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2005btirgumey še’ila mivni’im ba-roved ha-mukdam šel ha-ʕivrit ha-xadaša (Structural loan translations in Early Modern Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem PhD dissertation [in Hebrew].
Epstein, Ruth
1971ha-mišpatim ha-musai’im bamikra (The object clauses in the Old Testament). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University MA thesis [in Hebrew].
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita & Jörg Meibauer
2016Boris “Ich bin drin” Becker (‘Boris I am in Becker’). Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of a special naming construction. Lingua 1811. 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1974Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers of functional sentence perspective, 11–37. Prague: Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. & Thomas G. Bever
1965The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4(5). 414–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2009Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1(2). 262–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
2015Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 115–140. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Davide Ricca
2009Composita solvantur: Compounds as lexical units or morphological objects? Rivista di Linguistica 21(1). 35–70.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 151–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in cognitive sciences 7(5). 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert Malcolm Ward Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019What is the difference between a clause and a sentence? Available at [URL] (last access 24 August 2022).
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer
2007Corpus linguistics and the web. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo
2002le-tahalixey ha-hit’havut šel ha-ʕivrit be-Israel (The emergence of Spoken Israeli Hebrew). In Shlomo Izre’el & Margalit Mendelson (eds.), medabrim ʕivrit: le-xeker ha-lašon ha-meduberet ve-ha-šonut ha-lešonit be-Israel (Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the spoken language and in linguistic variation in Israel), 217–238. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2012mispax o mišpat ― le-mivne ha-mišpat ba-ʕivrit ha-meduberet (Hebrew sentence structure: Old habits die hard). In Malka Muchnik & Tsvi Sadan (eds.), mexkarim be-ʕivrit u-ve-lešonot ha-yehudim lixvod Ora Schwarzwald (Studies in Hebrew and in Jewish languages in honor of Ora Schwarzwald), 399–416. Jerusalm: Carmel. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Dagmar Divjak
2015The role of non-canonical subjects in the overall grammar of a language: A case study of Russian. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Subjects in constructions – Canonical and non-canonical, 293–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ježek, Elisabetta & Paolo Ramat
2009On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica 43(2). 391–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2007Negativity bias in language: A cognitive affective model of emotive intensifiers. Cognitive Linguistics 18(3). 417–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Neal F.
1965The psychological reality of phrase-structure rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4(6). 469–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1). 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1972Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3(3). 269–320.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic Judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9(2). 153–185.Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron
1989mivne ha-meser šel ha-mišpat ba-ʕivrit ha-isre’elit (Message structure of the sentence in Israeli Hebrew) Jerusalem: the Hebrew University in Jerusalem PhD dissertation [in Hebrew].
1992ha-x.g.m – xelek diber o ʕemda taxbirit? (The Nominal Impersonal: A part of speech or a syntactic construction?). Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of the Hebrew Language and Cognate Subjects 56(3). 241–248. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2001Hebrew and Zionism: A discourse analytic cultural study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002tavnit ha-x.g.m ha-pšuta ba-lašon ha-meyuceget ke-meduberet (The simple impersonal construction in spoken-like langauge). In Shlomo Izre’el & Margalit Mendelson (eds.), medabrim ʕivrit: le-xeker ha-lašon ha-meduberet ve-ha-šonut ha-lešonit be-Israel (Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the spoken language and in linguistic variation in Israel), 329–352. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2006atavnit mišpat ha-kiyum ke-toremet le-mašma’ut ha-kiyum (The contribution of the pattern of the existential sentence to existential meaning). In Aaron ‏Maman & Steven Ellis Fassberg (eds.), mexkarim be-lašon (Language studies), 101–112. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2006bdigmei ha-mišpat šel ha-ʕivrit ha-isre’elit al-pi Rosén: ʕiyun bikorti ve-hacaʕot tikun (Sentence patterns of Israeli Hebrew according to Rosén: A critical review and a corrected model). Ha-ʕivrit ve-axyoteha (Hebrew and its sisters) 6–71. 269–294. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
2012Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud & Maria Polinsky
1997Typological variation in Sentence-Focus constructions. In Kora Singer, Randall Eggert & Gregory Anderson (eds.), Proceedings from the Panels of the 33rd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 189–206. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol I1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol II1. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2020Univerbation. Folia Linguistica 54(41). 205–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard
1992An outline of English lexicology: Lexical structure, word semantics, and word-formation. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1984On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael
Meibauer, Jörg
2007How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17(2). 233–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melnik, Nurit
2002Verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley PhD dissertation.
2006A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2). 153–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2006Polysynthesis in the Arctic. In Marc-Antoine Mahieu & Nicole Tersis (eds.), Variations on polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages, 3–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marriane
2014Syntactic and prosodic structures: Segmentation, integration, and in between. In Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistics studies, 297–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2020Grammaticalization and polysynthesis: Iroquoian. In Walter Bisang and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Grammaticalization Scenarios from Africa, the Americas, and the Pacific, Vol. II1, 943–976. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mor, Uri & Na’ama Pat-El
2016The development of predicates with prepositional subjects in Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies 61(2). 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2016For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30(1). 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William
1998The syntax of idioms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(2). 279–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online
2019 Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ovid
1998Metamorphoses (trans. Melville, A. D.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Original work published 8 AD].Google Scholar
Pat-El, Na’ama
2018The diachrony of non-canonical subjects in Northwest Semitic. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Na’ama Pat-El & Stephen M. Carey (eds.), Non-canonically case-marked subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers, 159–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Davide Ricca
1998Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera & Dónall P. Ó. Baoill (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 187–273. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosén, Haiim B.
1977Contemporary Hebrew. Paris: De Guyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Ruvik
2005/2018milon ha-slang ha-makif (The comprehensive dictionary of Israeli slang). Jerusalem: Keter Books. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Eliezer
1968ha-mišpat ha-šemani: ʕiyunim be-taxbir yamenu (The nominal sentence: A study in the syntax of contemporary Hebrew). Tel Aviv: HaKibbutz HaMeuchad. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25(3). 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte, Spike Gildea, Jóhanna Barðdal & Elena Smirnova
2015Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, Naftali
1983x.g.m. u-dmuy poʕal + šem poʕal ba-ʕivrit ha-isre’elit (Impersonals (x.g.m) and verboids + infinitives in Israeli Hebrew). Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of the Hebrew Language and Cognate Subjects 47(3–4). 248–263. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Titone, Debra A. & Cynthia M. Connine
1994Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9(4). 247–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S.
1986Basic word order: Functional principles. London, UK: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Eynde, Karel
1995Methodological reflections on descriptive linguistics. Knud Togeby’s principles and the Pronominal Approach. In Lene Schøsler & Mary Talbot (eds.), Studies in valency. Vol. I1, 111–130. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
van den Eynde, Karel, Sabine Kirchmeier-Andersen, Piet Mertens & Lene Schøsler
2002Distributional syntactic analysis and valency: Basic notions, procedures, and applications of the Pronominal Approach. In Stephen M. Johnson & Bruce E. Nevin (eds.), The legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st century, Vol. II1, 163–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria
1989Free word order in Finnish: Its syntax and discourse functions. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Wexler, Paul
1990The schizoid nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic language in search of a Semitic past. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar