Possessive inflection in Chichimec inalienable nouns
The morphological organization of a closed irregular class
Person and number of a possessor are expressed in Chichimec in one of two ways. Most nouns use possessive classifiers. A smaller class (typically inalienables) inflects for the possessor synthetically. This paper constitutes the first in-depth exploration of this latter class. These nouns are characterized by unparalleled levels of irregularity, with more than 100 different inflection classes and most nouns exhibiting completely unique exponence patterns. The morphology of these nouns is based on several orthogonal inflectional layers: prefixes, stem alternations, and tone, all of which exhibit only weak predictive relations to other subsystems or cells, and equally unpredictable mappings to the possessor values they instantiate. The system is also extremely challenging with respect to segmentation, as most of the segments within the word can change in inflection seemingly independently of the neighbouring ones. This paper surveys this baroque system in search of its organizational principles.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Nominal (possessive) inflection in Chichimec
- 3.The inflectional complexity of “inalienable” nouns
- 3.1Person-number prefixes
- 3.2Stem alternations
- 3.3Inflectional tone
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Segmentation, speaker knowledge, and the PCFP
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (33)
References
Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackerman, Farrell, Robert Malouf & James P. Blevins. 2016. Patterns and discriminability in language analysis. Word structure 9(2). 132–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Avelino, Heriberto & Eurie Shin. 2011. Chapter 1: The phonetics of laringealization in Yucatec Maya. In Heriberto Avelino (ed.), New perspectives in Mayan linguistics, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baerman, Matthew. 2011. Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics 47(1). 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baerman, Matthew. 2014. Suppletive kin term paradigms in the languages of New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 18(3). 413–448. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bank, Sebastian. 2017. Segmentation: A remark on the Syncretism Principle. Morphology 27(1). 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beniamine, Sacha & Matías Guzmán Naranjo. 2021. Multiple alignments of inflectional paradigms. Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 4(1). 216–227.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyé, Gilles and Gauvain Schalchli. 2019. Realistic data and paradigms: The paradigm cell finding problem. Morphology 29(2). 199–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carroll, Matthew Jay. 2016. The Ngkolmpu Language with special reference to distributed exponence. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
Dahl, Östen & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. Kinship in grammar. In Irène Baron, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession, 201–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Angulo, Jaime. 1933. The Chichimeco language (Central Mexico). International Journal of American Linguistics 7(3/4). 152–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erdmann, Alexander, Micha Elsner, Shijie Wu, Ryan Cotterell & Nizar Habash. 2020. The paradigm discovery problem. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7778–7790, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feist, Timothy & Enrique L. Palancar. 2015. Oto-Manguean Inflectional Class Database. University of Surrey. [URL]
Feist, Timothy & Enrique L. Palancar. 2021. Paradigmatic restructuring and the diachrony of stem alternations in Chichimec. Language 97(1). 1–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferro, Marcello, Claudia Marzi & Vito Pirrelli. 2011. A self-organizing model of word storage and processing: implications for morphology learning. Lingue e linguaggio 10(2). 209–226.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, Lorna & Doris Bartholomew. 1979. Pame noun inflection. International Journal of American Linguistics 45(4). 309–322. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herce, Borja. 2020. Stem alternations in Kiranti and their implications for the morphology–phonology interface. Journal of Linguistics 57(2). 321–363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herce, Borja. 2022. Stress and stem allomorphy in the Romance perfectum: emergence, typology, and motivations of a symbiotic relation. Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lastra, Yolanda. 2004. Caracterización del chichimeco jonaz: la posesión. Revista de Lenguas Indígenas y Universos Culturales Año 2004(1). 61–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, Jackson & John A. Goldsmith. 2014. Automatic morphological alignment and clustering. Technical report TR-2014-07, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lizárraga Navarro, Glenda Zoé. 2018. Morfología verbal de persona y número en Chichimeco jonaz. Tlalpan: El Colegio de México PhD dissertation.
Mansfield, John, Sabine Stoll & Balthasar Bickel. 2020. Category clustering: A probabilistic bias in the morphology of verbal agreement marking. Language 96(2). 255–293. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mansfield, John. 2016. Intersecting formatives and inflectional predictability: How do speakers and learners predict the correct form of Murrinhpatha verbs? Word Structure 9(2). 183–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marmion, Douglas Edric. 2010. Topics in the phonology and morphology of Wutung. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4). 939–971. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2015. Inflection in Murrinh-Patha. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 491–520. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palancar, Enrique L. & Heriberto Avelino. 2019. Inflectional complexity and verb classes in Chichimec. Amerindia 411. 323–360.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parker, Jeff & Andrea D. Sims. 2019. Irregularity, paradigmatic layers, and the complexity of inflection class systems: A study of Russian nouns. In Peter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (eds.), The complexities of morphology, 23–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silvey, Catriona, Simon Kirby & Kenny Smith. 2015. Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions. Cognitive Science 39(1). 212–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew. 2012. Identifying stems. Word Structure 5(1). 88–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, Gregory & Raphael A. Finkel. 2015. The complexity of inflectional systems. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 101–117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornton, Anna M. 2012. Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2). 183–207. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Herce, Borja
2024.
VeLePa: Central Pame verbal inflection in a quantitative perspective.
Morphology ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.