Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 47:4 (2023) ► pp.870899
References (70)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 42–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amha, Azeb. 2007. Questioning forms in Zargulla. In Rainer Voigt (ed.), From beyond the Mediterranean: Akten des 7. Internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses, 197–210. Düren: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2009. The morphosyntax of negation in Zargulla. In W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages, 197–220. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory. 2001. A new classification of South Munda: Evidence from comparative verb morphology. Indian linguistics 62(1–4). 21–36.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2007. The Munda verb: Typological perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The Munda languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Norman H. Zide. 2001. Recent advances in the reconstruction of the Proto-Munda verb. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1993. Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language 69(1). 68–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2010. Clitic doubling: Towards a typology. Paper presented at the Workshop on Clitics and Syntactic Typology. Available at: [URL] (last access 12 November 2022).
Baker, Brett J. 2002. How referential is agreement? In Nicholas D. Evans & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis, 51–85. Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1996. Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. In Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 1–40. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter. 2015. Feeding, sharing, and devouring: Ritual and society in Highland Odisha, India. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.31, 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Wilhelm Geuder. 2003. Light verbs in Urdu and grammaticalization. In Regine Eckardt, Klaus von Heusinger & Christoph Schwarze (eds.), Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view, 295–350. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capell, Arthur. 1972. The affix-transferring languages of Australia. Linguistics 10(87). 5–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. Towards a typology of pronominal cliticization. Handout presented at the 5th International Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology. Available at [URL] (last access 12 November 2022).
. 2004. The rise of person inflection with special reference to the Munda languages. Paper presented at the 11th International Morphology Meeting 2004.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7(11). 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2002. Australian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe. 2004. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 71. 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facundes, Sidney da Silva. 2000. The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). Buffalo, NY: SUNY PhD dissertation.
Forker, Diana. 2016. Floating agreement and information structure: The case of Sanzhi Dargwa. Studies in Language 40(1). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaby, Alice Rose. 2006. A grammar of Kuuk Thaayorre. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
Givón, Talmy. 2011. Ute reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles. 1997. On Theme, Topic and Given-ness: The state of the art. Moenia 135–155.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Arlo. 2008. Gutob. In Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda languages, 633–681. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Diana Forker. 2018. Agreement in grammar and discourse: A research overview. Linguistics 56(4). 715–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2000. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76(3). 593–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellenthal, Anneke Christine. 2010. A grammar of Sheko. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2014. Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4). 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Johann Baptist. 1903. Mundari grammar. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2011. Towards a typological study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation: Pavia: Università degli Studi di Pavia PhD dissertation.
Just, Erika & Slavomír Čéplö. 2022. Differential object indexing in Maltese – a corpus based pilot study. In Przemyslaw Turek & Julia Nintemann (eds.), Maltese: Contemporary changes and historical innovations, 105–132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, Erika & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. accepted. A corpus-based analysis of P indexing in Ruuli (Bantu, JE103).
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997. Beyond subject and object: towards a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 279–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud & Maria Polinsky. 1997. Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. Proceedings from the Thirty-Third Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Panels on Linguistic Ideologies in Contact. 198–206. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan & Daniel Wedgwood. 2013. The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49(1). 127–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. 1996. The functions of split-wackernagel clitic systems: Pronominal clitics in the Ngumpin languages. In Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching Second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 299–332. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Mereu, Lunella. 1999. Agreement, pronominalization and word order in pragmatically-oriented languages. In Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax, 231–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1992. Is basic word order universal? In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility, 15–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2006. Motivations for second position: evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic Typology 10(3). 287–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana & Jane Simpson. 2008. Free to bound to free? Interactions between pragmatics and syntax in the development of Australian pronominal systems. Language 84(3). 566–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neukom, Lukas. 2001. Santali. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Okrand, Marc. 1977. Mutsun grammar. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley PhD dissertation.
Osada, Toshiki. 2008. Mundari. In Gregory D. S. Anderson & Norman H. Zide (eds.), The Munda languages, 99–164. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, Jamal. 1993. Subject-extraction, negation and the anti-agreement effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11(3). 477–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel. 2018. Tracing the sources of Information Structure: Towards the study of interactional management of information. Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 77–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Multifactorial Information Management (MIM): Summing up the emerging alternative to Information Structure. Linguistics Vanguard 7(1). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John. 2011. A grammar of Kharia. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1966. A comparative study of the verb in the Munda languages. Studies in comparative Austroasiatic linguistics 51. 96–193.Google Scholar
Press, Margaret L. 1979. Chemehuevi: A grammar and lexicon. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, Carol. 2008. A grammar of Koromu (Kesawai), a Trans New Guinea language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
Rajan, Jamuna & Herold Rajan. 2001. Grammar write-up of Gutob-Gadaba. Lamptaput: Asha Kiran Society.Google Scholar
Schikowski, Robert. 2013. Object-conditioned differential marking in Chintang and Nepali. Zürich: University of Zürich PhD dissertation.
Schnell, Stefan. 2018. Whence subject-verb agreement? Investigating the role of topicality, accessibility, and frequency in Vera’a texts. Linguistics 56(4). 735–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2015. The Palaungic languages: Classification, reconstruction and comparative lexicon. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros & Gisbert Fanselow. 2010. Focus types and argument asymmetries: a cross-linguistic study in language production. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, 169–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Ian & Steve Johnson. 1985. The syntax of clitic cross-referencing pronouns in Kugu Nganhcara. Anthropological linguistics 271. 102–111.Google Scholar
Strom, Eva-Marie. 2013. The Ndengeleko language of Tanzania. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet PhD dissertation.
Voß, Judith. 2015. Person markers in Gutob. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(2). 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Documentation and Grammar of Gutob (Munda). Endangered Languages Archive. Available at: [URL] (last access 12 November 2022).
Wackernagel, Jacob, George Walkden, Christina Sevdali & Morgan Macleod. 2020. On a law of Indo-European word order (Classics in Linguistics 7). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wistrand Robinson, Lila & James Armagost. 1990. Comanche dictionary and grammar. Arlington. Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ilja A. Seržant. 2018. Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In Ilja A. Serzant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking, 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Zide, Norman H. 1997. Gutob pronominal clitics and related phenomena elsewhere in Gutob-Remo-Gta. In Anvita Abbi (ed.), Languages of tribal and indigenous peoples of India: The ethnic space, 307–334. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar