Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 47:1 (2023) ► pp.79119
References
Artemjev, Nikolaj M.
2013Dolganskij jazyk. 10–11 klassy. Učebnoe posobie dlja obščeobrazovatel’nych učreždenij. Čast’ 2. Morfologija. [The Dolgan language. 10th to 11th grade. Textbook for secondary schools. Part 2. Morphology]. Saint Petersburg: Almaz-Graf.Google Scholar
Assmann, Muriel, Daniel Büring, Izabela Jordanoska & Max Prüller
2019Towards a theory of morphosyntactic focus marking. Unpublished manuscript. [URL] (last access 15 March 2022).
Brykina, Maria, Valentin Gusev, Sándor Szeverényi & Beáta Wagner-Nagy
2018Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (NSLC). Archived at Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora. Version 0.2. Published on 2018-06-12. [URL]
Bühler, Karl
1965 [1934]Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. 2nd edn. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Castrén 1854 = Schiefner, Anton
(ed.) 1854M. Alexander Castrén’s Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. Saint-Peterburg: Eggers et Comp.Google Scholar
Däbritz, Chris Lasse
2021Topik, Fokus und Informationsstatus: Modellierung am Material nordwestsibirischer Sprachen. Language, Context and Cognition 17. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. A grammar of Dolgan: A Northern Siberian Turkic language of the Taimyr Peninsula. Leiden: Brill. DOI logo
Däbritz, Chris Lasse, Nina Kudryakova & Eugénie Stapert
2019INEL Dolgan Corpus. Version 1.0. Published on 2019-08-31. [URL].
Däbritz, Chris Lasse & Valentin Gusev
2021INEL Evenki Corpus. Version 1.0. Publication date 2021-12-31. Archived at Universität Hamburg. [URL].
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and information structure (Cambridge studies in linguistics 131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1996On necessary and sufficient conditions. Journal of Semantics 51. 275–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya M.
2006Typology of information structures in the Altaic languages. In Elena V. Boikova & Rostislay B. Rybakov (eds.), Kinship in the Altaic world. Proceedings of the 48th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, 149–171. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Götze, Michael, Thomas Weskott, Cornelia Endriss, Ines Fiedler, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Svetlana Petrova, Anne Schwarz, Stavros Skopeteas & Ruben Stoel
2007Information structure. In Stephanie Dipper, Michael Götze & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Information structure in cross-linguistic corpora (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 07), 147–187. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. Available at: [URL] (last access 15 March 2022).
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 31: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grönbech, Kaare
1936Der türkische Sprachbau. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Grzech, Karolina
2016The marker =ga and topicality in Tena Kichwa. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 181. 33–52.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Stefan Schnell
2014Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical relations and animacy in discourse). Manual version 7.0. Available at [URL] (last access 15 March 2022).
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe
2002Informationsstrukturierung in slavischen Sprachen: Zur Rekonstruktion in einem syntax-zentrierten Modell der Grammatik. Leipzig: University of Leipzig Habilitation dissertation.Google Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe & Gerhild Zybatow
2009Grammatik und Informationsstruktur. In Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds.), Die slavischen Sprachen (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 32:1), 684–707. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky, Andrey
In prep. The digital corpus of Enets. Unpublished corpus.
Kim, Alan
1988Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 147–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koškarëva, Natalja B.
2005Očerki po sintaksisu lesnogo dialekta neneckogo jazyka. [Sketches of the syntax of the Forest dialect of the Nenets language]. Novosibirsk: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, Sibirskoe Otdelenie.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 551. 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan
2012Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure (The expression of cognitive categories 5), 1–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kudrinskij, Maksim I., Darja P. Popova & Aleksandra P. Simonenko
2014Fokusnye časticy v kazymskom dialekte chatyjskogo jazyka: analiz priimennych upotreblenij. [Focus particles in the Kazym dialect of the Khanty language: An analysis of the adnominal usages]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 10(1). 781–786.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1969Theme, contrast, and exhaustive listing – wa and ga in Japanese. The Bulletin of the Institute for Research in Language Teaching 2891. 19–32.Google Scholar
1972Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3(3). 269–320.Google Scholar
1973The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1982Categories and cognitive models. Trier: Linguistic Agency of the University of Trier.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents (Cambridge studies in linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malčukov, Andrej
2008Sintaksis evenskogo jazyka: semantičeskie, strukturnye, kommunikativnye aspekty [Syntax of Even: functional, structural, discourse aspects]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan & Daniel Wedgwood
2013The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 491. 127–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
1991Das TOPIK im Deutschen und Ungarischen (Lunder germanistische Forschungen 58). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1995Focus in Quechua. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse configurational languages (Oxford studies in comparative syntax), 375–393. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1997Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
1999Ostyak (Languages of the World/Materials 305). München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2003Possessive affixes in the pragmatic structuring of the utterance: Evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2014A grammar of Tundra Nenets (Mouton Grammar Library 65). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina, Edward Garrett & Oliver Bond
2019Endangered languages and cultures of Siberia. [URL] (last access 12 January 2022).
Nissim, Malvina & Shipra Dingare, Jean Carletta & Mark Steedmann
2004An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In Maria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira & Rute Costa & Raquel Silva (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 1023–1026. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel
2019Tracing the source of information structure: Towards the study of interactional management of information. Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 77–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Multifactoral Information Management (MIM): Summing up the emerging alternative to information structure. Linguistics Vanguard 7(1). 20200039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920 [1880]Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
1983Transparent versus functional encoding of grammatical relations. Linguistische Berichte 861. 1–13.Google Scholar
Rudnickaja, Elena L.
2018Delimitativnyj affiks riktV i fokusnaja častica (h)ələ v evenkijskom jazyke kak veršiny dvuch raznych proekcij DelimP i FocP. [The delimitative affix -riktV- and the focus particle (h)ələ in the Evenki language as heads of the two different projections DelimP and FocP]. In Ekaterina A. Ljutikova & Anton V. Zimmerlinh (eds.), Tipologija morfosintaksičeskich parametrov. Materialy meždunarodnoj konferencii. [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters. Materials of the international conference], Vol. 41, 209–221. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyj institut russkogo jazyka im. A.S. Puškina.Google Scholar
Schurz, Gerhard
2020Logik. Grund- und Aufbaukurs in Aussagen- und Prädikatenlogik. 2nd edn. (De Gruyter Studium). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegl, Florian
2013Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia (Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 267). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2015The non-possessive use of px.2p in Nganasan and Dolgan. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 391. 67–100.Google Scholar
Smith, Edward E. & Douglas L. Medin
1981Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinitz, Wolfgang
1950Ostjakische Grammatik und Chrestomathie: mit Wörterverzeichnis. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
1995 [1952]Linguistic categorization – Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Volker Gast
2012Categories and prototypes. In Jae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Online edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilevič, Glafira M.
1958Evenkijsko-russkij slovar’. [Evenki-Russian dictionary]. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo inostrannych i nacional’nych slovarej.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2019A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta, Sándor Szeverényi & Valentin Gusev
2018User’s guide to Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology 1). Szeged, Hamburg: Universität Szeged, Universität Hamburg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weil, Henry
1869 [1844]De l’ordre des dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. 2nd edn. Paris: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, Ferdinand Johann
1847Versuch einer Grammatik der syrjänischen Sprache. Reval: Franz Kluge.Google Scholar
Zayzon, Réka
2015Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 61. 259–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zybatow, Gerhild & Uwe Junghanns
1998Topiks im Russischen (Sprache & Pragmatik 47). Lund: Germanistisches Institut der Universität Lund.Google Scholar