This study reports on a significant negative association found in a cross-linguistic sample between the degree of predictability of word stress from a word boundary and the extent to which stress has segmental effects. In other words, in a given language the less predictable stress is from the word boundary, the more likely that the language will have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables, vowel lengthening in stressed syllables, and consonantal changes restricted to stressed or unstressed syllables. These findings are interpreted as part of a major diachronic tendency for stressed and unstressed syllables to become more differentiated in terms of duration as a cumulative effect of phonetic change, which in turn leads to the deletion of unstressed syllables, which renders stress unpredictable in some cases. A model of phonological representation that best accounts for the unidirectionality of this strong tendency is one in which stress, even while it is still predictable, is considered an inherent part of the word, and phonetic changes have a permanent and cumulative effect on lexical representation.
2023. The effects of context of learning on the perception of Spanish stress by Japanese speakers. Journal of Speech Sciences 12 ► pp. e023004 ff.
HOFMANN, Klaus & Andreas BAUMANN
2021. Trochaic bias overrides stress typicality in English lexical development. Journal of Child Language 48:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Ordin, Mikhail
2019. Speech rhythm as naturally occurring and culturally transmitted behavioral patterns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1453:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Zingler, Tim
2018. Reduction without fusion: Grammaticalization and wordhood in Turkish. Folia Linguistica 52:2 ► pp. 415 ff.
Baumann, Andreas & Nikolaus Ritt
2017. On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory. Phonology 34:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
2016. Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology. In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, ► pp. 311 ff.
Ordin, Mikhail & Leona Polyanskaya
2015. Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138:2 ► pp. 533 ff.
van der Hulst, Harry
2014. The study of word accent and stress: past, present, and future. In Word Stress, ► pp. 3 ff.
Hyman, Larry M
2008. Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46:2
Hyman, Larry M.
2008. Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25:1-2
Hyman, Larry M.
2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31:2-3 ► pp. 213 ff.
Hyman, Larry M.
2014. Do all languages have word accent?. In Word Stress, ► pp. 56 ff.
Scheibman, Joanne
2000. I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ► pp. 779 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.