Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 48:2 (2024) ► pp.253–286

The psycholinguistic realization of topic in Chinese

Cross-modal priming in the processing of Chinese OSV sentences

ORCID logo | Soochow University
An OSV word order that deviates from the canonical SVO word order is typically viewed as derived through movement. This theory has been widely supported by psycholinguistic studies showing that the displaced constituents are mentally reactivated at the gap positions. However, some cognitive-functionalists have proposed an alternative account: in a topic-prominent language like Chinese, topic is the basic unit of a sentence that delimits the frame within which the main predication holds. The present study adopts the cross-modal antecedent priming technique to test whether the sentence-initial object is structurally associated with the verb in native speakers’ online processing. Results of two experiments show that the sentence-initial object is not associated with the verb whatsoever, neither lexically nor structurally, shedding light on the typological characteristics of Chinese as a topic-prominent language. However, the processing of the antecedent object was shown facilitated at the post-quantifier position.
Keywords: psycholinguistics, cross-modal priming, Chinese, topic structure, topic-prominent language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and background
    • 1.1The Chinese OSV topic sentence
    • 1.2Literature review
      • 1.2.1Online processing of dislocated constituents: TRH vs DAH
      • 1.2.2Online processing of Chinese OSV topic sentences
  • 2.Research question and methodology
  • 3.Experiment 1
    • 3.1Materials
    • 3.2Procedure
    • 3.3Participants
    • 3.4Results
    • 3.5Discussion
  • 4.Experiment 2
    • 4.1Materials
    • 4.2Procedure
    • 4.3Participants
    • 4.4Results
    • 4.5Discussion
  • 5.General discussion
  • 6.Conclusion and future directions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22041.zha
References (71)
References
Baayen, Harald R., Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 591. 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. & Brian McElree. 1988. Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry 191. 35–43.Google Scholar
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2017. brms: An R Package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80(1). 15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cai, Rendong & Yanping Dong. 2010. 汉语话题化结构空位的心理现实性研究 – 来自填充语启动实验的证据 Hanyu huatihua jiegou kongwei de xinli xianshixing yanjiu: laizi tianchongyu qidong shiyan de zhengju [An empirical study of the psychological reality of the gap in Chinese topicalization: Evidence from filler priming]. 现代外语 Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages (Quarterly)] 33(1). 64–71.Google Scholar
Chacon, Dustin Alfonso, Mashrur Imtiaz, Shirsho Dasgupta, Sikder Monoare Murshed, Mina Dan & Colin Phillips. 2016. Locality and word order in active dependency formation in Bangla. Front Psychol 71. 1235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Sam Featherston. 1999. Antecedent-priming at trace positions: evidence from German scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 281. 415–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 271. 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana. 2007. Electrifying results: ERP data and cognitive linguistics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics, 400–423. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Janet D. Fodor. 1985. “How can grammars help parsers?” In David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Natural language processing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives, 94–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, Claudia & Leah Roberts. 2007. Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research 231. 9–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1978. Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9(3). 427–473.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn & Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais. 1989. Filler driven parsing: a study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 281. 331–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1987. Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 51. 519–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward & Gregory Hickok. 1993. Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(2). 147–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science 71. 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, Anja & Angela D. Friederici. 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(2). 194–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 2011. Competing motivations. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Shuanfan. 2013. Chinese grammar at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yu-Chi & Elsi Kaiser. 2008. Investigating filler-gap dependencies in Chinese topicalization. In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), 129–135. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk, Jidong Chen, Melissa Bowerman & Asifa Majid. 2010. Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture 101. 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics 39(4). 641–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, Jill. 2014. Self-paced reading. In Jill Jegerski & Bill VanPatten (eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics, 20–49. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jiang, Song. 2017. The semantics of Chinese classifiers and linguistic relativity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Natalie M., Greg N. Carlson, Renjie Li, Florian Jaeger & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2012. Classifying and massifying incrementally in Chinese language comprehension. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 261–282. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehrsen, Will. 2018. Introduction to Bayesian linear regression. Towards Data Science. 2018. Available at [URL], last access 16 May 2023.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 1995. Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In Pamela Downing & Michael Noonan (eds.), Word order in discourse, 297–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, Elaine & Theres Grüter. 2015. Real-time processing of classifier information by L2 speakers of Chinese. In Diane Massam (ed.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 311–323. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Jie. 2014. Grammatically-guided resolution of filler-gap dependencies: An investigation of Chinese multiple dependencies. Kansas City: University of Kansas MA thesis.
Love, Tracy & David Swinney. 1996. Conference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: demonstration of antecedent reactivation with cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 201. 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, Theodore, Leah Roberts, Claudia Felser & Harald Clahsen. 2005. Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 271. 53–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto, Edson & Shoichi Takahashi. 2002. Antecedent reactivation in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 431. 127–142.Google Scholar
Morbiato, Anna. 2017. Word order and sentence structure in Mandarin Chinese: New perspectives. Venice, Italy: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, and Sydney, Australia: The University of Sydney PhD dissertation.
Nakano, Yoko, Claudia Felser & Herald Clahsen. 2002. Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 311. 531–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neely, James. 1991. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Derek Besner & Glyn Humphreys (eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, 264–336. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nicol, Janet & David Swinney. 1989. The role of structure and co-reference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 181. 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, Janet. 1993. Reconsidering reactivation. In Derek Besner & Glyn Humphreys (eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting, 321–347. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osterhout, Lee & David A. Swinney. 1993. On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22(2). 273–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin & Guy Barry. 1991. Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 61. 229–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin. 1993. Direct Association and sentence processing: A reply to Gibson, and Hickok. Language and Cognitive Processes 81. 163–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qu, Yan-Feng. 1994. Object noun phrase dislocation in Mandarin Chinese. Vancouver: University of British Columbia PhD dissertation.
Roberts, Leah, Theodore Marinis, Claudia Felser & Harald Clahsen. 2007. Antecedent priming at gap positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36(3). 175–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sag, Ivan & Janet Fodor. 1994. Extraction without traces. In Raul Aranovich, William Byme, Susanne Preuss & Martha Senturia (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th West Coast conference on formal linguistics, 365–384. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 1992. The nature of topic comment constructions and topic constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California PhD dissertation.
. 1998. 汉语主题句的特征 Hanyu zhutiju de tezheng [The nature of Chinese topics]. Beijing: Modern Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76(2). 383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shillcock, Richard. 1982. The on-line resolution of pronominal anaphora. Language and Speech 25(4). 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic. Los Angeles: University of Southern California PhD dissertation.
Stan Development Team. 2017. Stan: A C++ Library for Probability and Sampling, Version 2.14.0. Available at [URL], last access 16 May 2023.
Stowe, Laurie A. 1986. Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 11. 227–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swinney, David & William Onifer, Penny Prathe & Max Hirshkowitz. 1979. Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory and Cognition 71. 159–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James. H.-Y. & Lianqing Wang. 1990. A semantic study of the classifier Tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association XXVI (1). 35–56.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig L. 1978. Topics in German syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Boston PhD dissertation.
Traxler, Matthew & Martin Pickering. 1996. Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 351. 454–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Cara & Craig G. Chambers. 2011. Appearances aren’t everything: Shape classifiers and referential processing in Cantonese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(5). 1065–1080.Google Scholar
Van de Schoot, Rens & Joris J. Broere, Koen H. Perryck, Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg & Nancy E. Van Loey. 2015. Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: The case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 61. 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Schoot, Rens & Sarah Depaoli. 2014. Bayesian analyses: Where to start and what to report. European Health Psychologist 21. 75–84.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Zhenlai. 2004. 被动表述对自主动词和非自主动词的选择 Beidong biaoshu dui zizhu dongci he feizizhu dongci de xuanze [Selection of volitional and nonvolitional verb in passive statement]. 汉语学习 Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Learning] (6). 17–22.Google Scholar
Wanner, Erik & Michael Maratsos. 1978. An ATN approach to comprehension. In Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan & George A. Miller (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 119–161. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Yiming & Tao Liu. 2013. 汉语话题句中语迹的神经机制研究 Hanyu huatiju Zhong yuji de shenjing jizhi yanjiu [On the neutral mechanism of the traces of Chinese topicalization]. 中国社会科学 Zhongguo Shehui Kexue [Social Sciences in China] (6). 146–166.Google Scholar
Yuan, Yulin. 1996. 话题化及相关的语法过程 Yufahua ji xiangguan de yufa guocheng [Topicalization and Related Grammatical Process]. 中国语文 Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 254 (4). 241–254.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jinjun, Nini Xie, Shihua Wang, Yanan Li & Tieying Zhang. 2010. 汉语水平考试研制报告 Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi yanzhi baogao [Report of Chinese Proficiency Test designing]. 中国考试 Zhongguo Kaoshi [China Examinations] 91. 38–44.Google Scholar