Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 23:1 (1999) ► pp.173–183
Book review

Ans Van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds). Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. xi and 544 pp.

Reviewed by
| Arizona State University
Published online: 2 July 1999
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.1.08gel
References (10)
References
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gelderen, E. van. 1993. “The ‘introduction’ of AGRo”. LSA paper.Google Scholar
. 1996. “The case of the object in the history of English”. Linguistic Analysis 261: 1–16.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Inflection and movement in Old English”, in Problemsyntax, Abraham, W. and Van Gelderen, E. (eds). Tübingen: Niemeyer: 71–82.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1996. “Partitive case and aspect”, ms Stanford.Google Scholar
Koster, J. 1975. “Dutch as an SOV language”. Linguistic Analysis 11: 111–36.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: variation and change in Old English word order. University of Pennsylvania PhD.Google Scholar
Zwart, J. -W. 1997. Morphosyntax of verb movement. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar