Cover not available
Article published In:
Evidentiality, Modality and Grammaticalization
Edited by Eric Mélac
[Studies in Language 48:3] 2024
► pp. 543–574
 

Speaking about knowledge

Evidentiality and the ecology of language

ORCID logo | Central Queensland University
We focus on the grammatical expression of four major groups of meanings related to knowledge: I. Evidentiality: grammatical expression of information source; II. Egophoricity: grammatical expression of access to knowledge; III. Mirativity: grammatical expression of expectation of knowledge; and IV. Epistemic modality: grammatical expression of attitude to knowledge. The four groups of categories interact. Some develop overtones of the others. Epistemic-directed evidentials have additional meanings typical of epistemic modalities, while egophoricity-directed evidentials combine some reference to access to knowledge by speaker and addressee. Over the past thirty years, new evidential choices have evolved among the Tariana – whose language has five evidential terms in an egophoricity-directed system – to reflect new ways of acquiring information, including radio, television, phone, and internet. Evidentials stand apart from other means of knowledge-related categories as tokens of language ecology corroborated by their sensitivity to the changing social environment.
Keywords: evidentiality, information source, epistemic modality, mirativity, egophoricity, Tariana, language ecology
Article outline
  • 1.Knowledge through grammar: A starting point
    • I.Evidentiality: Grammatical expression of information source, that is how one knows what one is talking about
    • II.Egophoricity: Grammatical expression of preferential access to knowledge
    • III.Mirativity: Grammaticalised expression of expectation of knowledge
    • IV.Epistemic modality: Grammaticalised expression of attitude to knowledge – whether certain, uncertain, probable, possible, reliable, or unreliable
  • 2.The web of knowledge: Interrelationships between the four groups of knowledge-related meanings
    • 2.1Egophoricity-directed evidentials
    • 2.2Mirativity-directed evidentials
    • 2.3Epistemic-directed evidentials
  • 3.How evidentials are special
  • 4.In with the new: Evidentials in the changing world
  • 5.To conclude: Evidentials as tokens of the ecology of language
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
References (95)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003a. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003b. Evidentiality in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 3–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012a. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 161. 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a. The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015b. Evidentiality and its interrelations with other categories. Linguistic Typology 191. 239–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Evidentiality: the framework. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of evidentiality, 1–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020a. Language loss and language gain in Amazonia: on newly emergent varieties of a national language. In Stefan Fafulas (ed.), Amazonian Spanish. Language contact and evolution, 7–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b. Language contact and language endangerment. In Anthony Grant (ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact, 241–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2021a. The web of knowledge. Evidentiality at the cross–roads. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021b. The grammaticalization of evidentiality. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 602–610. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2021c. The ways of speaking and the means of knowing: the Tariana of northwest Amazonia. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey (eds.), The integration of language and society: A cross-linguistic typology, 175–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022. Dizque, dizque, dizque: on the development of evidentials in Romance languages in the light of language context. Plenary paper presented at the conference Evidential strategies in Romance languages, Universidad de Alcalá, 26 October 2022.
2023. What everybody knows: expressing shared knowledge thorough evidentials. In Susana Rodríguez Rosique & Jordi M. Antolí Martínez (eds.), 1–17. Verb and context. The impact of shared knowledge on TAME categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey. 2021. The integration of language and society: a cross-linguistic view. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey (eds.), The integration of language and society: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcázar, Asier. 2018. Dizque and other emergent evidential forms in Romance languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 725–740. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bai, Junwei. 2020. A grammar of Munya. Cairns: James Cook University Ph.D. thesis.
. 2021. A typological study of evidentiality in Qiangic languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik. 2015. The role of perspective in epistemic marking. Lingua 186–1871. 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Frans. 1938. Language. In Franz Boas (ed.), General anthropology, 124–145. Boston, New York: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Casseb-Galvão, Vânia Cristina. 2011. Gramática discursivo-funcional e teoria da gramaticalização: revisitando os usos de [diski] no português brasileiro. Filologia Linguística Portuguesa 13 (2). 305–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentialty. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 359–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 161. 529–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta and Olga Fernández-Soriano. 2022. A multidimensional analysis of the Spanish reportative epistemic evidential dizque . Lingua 2661. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1995. Complement clauses and complementation strategies. In F. R. Palmer (ed.), Grammar and meaning. A Festschrift for John Lyons, 175–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Evidentiality in Jarawara. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 165–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 3. Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016. Are some languages better than others? Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. The essence of linguistic analysis: An integrated approach. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drolma, Dawa & Hiroyuki Suzuki. Forthcoming. The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams. This volume.
Eberhard, David M. 2009. A grammar of Mamaindê: A northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
2018. Evidentiality in Nambikwara languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 333–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliasson, Stig. 2015. The birth of ‘language ecology’: Interdisciplinary influences in Einar Haugen’s “The ecology of language”. Language Sciences 501. 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Rick. 1996. The radial structure of the Wanka reportative. In Eugene Casad (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, 895–941. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1999. The structure of evidential categories in Wanka Quechua. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon. 2005. The poetics of evidentiality in South American storytelling. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 161. 28–41.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana. 2014. The grammar of knowledge in Hinuq. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge, 52–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor. 2018. Where do evidentials come from?. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greed, Teija. 2018. The quotative in Bashkir. Studia Orientalia Electronica 61. 23–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1986. Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 113–136. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1972. The ecology of language. In The ecology of language. Essays by Einar Haugen, selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil, 325–339. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2022. The grammar of interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: Hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 161. 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2018a. Mirativity and egophoricity in Kurtöp. In Simeon Floyd, Elizabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 109–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Evidentiality in Bodic languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 595–609. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Grammaticalized sources of Kurtöp verbal morphology. Studies in Language 441. 132–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Miratives and magic: On “newness” as iconic grammar in Kurtöp narratives. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert L. Bradhsaw, Luca Ciucci & Pema Wangdi (eds.), Celebrating indigenous voice. Legends and narratives in languages of the tropics and beyond, 219–235. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2018. Non-propositional evidentiality. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 109–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H. Jr. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 3–28. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Turkic indirectives. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24), 61–87. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Turkic indirectivity. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 510–524. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar’. Studies in Language 351. 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Christa. 2013. Source of information and unexpected information in !Xun – evidential, mirative and counterexpectation marker. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), Linguistic expression of perception and cognition, 69–94. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Dorothy D. 1938. Conceptual implications of an Indian language. Philosophy of Science 51. 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1944. Linguistic reflection of Wintu thought. International Journal of American Linguistics 101. 181–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Liberty. 2007. Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 301. 45–88.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2003. Evidentiality in Yukaghir. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in evidentiality, 219–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Henry Davis, & Hotze Rullmann. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át’imcets. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 71. 201–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLendon, Sally. 2003. Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in evidentiality, 101–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mélac, Eric. 2014. L’évidentialité en anglais. Approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais – tibétain. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Ph.D. thesis.
. 2021. Grammaticalization of evidentials. Paper presented at the conference Evidentiality and modality: at the cross-roads of grammar and lexicon, Université de Montpellier-3 Paul Valéry, 10 June.
Mélac, Eric & Joanna Bialek. Forthcoming. Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger: An investigation of evidentyial developmens in Tibetic languages and beyond. This volume.
Mortelmans, Tanja. Forthcoming. Frequency differences in reportative exceptionality and how to account for them: a case study on verbal reportative markers in French, Dutch and German. This volume.
Narrog, Heiko & Wenjiang Yang. 2018. Evidentiality in Japanese. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 709–724. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina. 2002. Evidentials, Miratives and Indirectives in Shor. In Demir, Nurettin & Fikret Turan (eds.), Scholarly depth and accuracy: A festschrift to Lars Johanson, 307–323. Ankara: Grafiker.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2018. The interactional and cultural pragmatics of evidentiality in Pastaza Quichua. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 202–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Chia-jung. 2018. Evidentiality in Formosan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 657–673. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. The versatility of inferential evidentiality. Evidence from Saaroa. In Chris Shei & Saihong Li (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Asian linguistics, 408–429. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2018. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Gitksan. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 463–489. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Harvey. 1984. Wintu grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 1997. A Fala Tukano dos Yepâ-masa. Tomo I. Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia CEDEM.Google Scholar
de Reuse, W. J. 2003. Evidentiality in Western Apache. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 79–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarvasy, Hannah. 2018. Evidentiality in the languages of New Guinea. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 629–656. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skribnik, Elena. 2023. Reading Siberian folklore: Miratives, pre-mirative contexts and “Hero’s Journey”. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert L. Bradhsaw, Luca Ciucci & Pema Wangdi (eds.), Celebrating indigenous voice. Legends and narratives in languages of the tropics and beyond, 237–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skribnik, Elena & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2024. Evidentiality in Northern Asia. In Edward Vajda (ed.), The languages of Northern Asia, 1006–1063. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2018. Extragrammatical expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 273–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine and Elsa Gomez-Imbert. 2018. Evidentiality in Tukanoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 357–387. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2018. Evidentiality and the expression of knowledge: An African perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 610–628. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2018. Evidentials and person. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Telles, Stella and W. Leo Wetzels. 2006. Evidentiality and epistemic mood in Lakondê. In J. Grazyna Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a Verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, 235–252. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & K. Jiatso, K. 2001. Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 241. 49–111.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine. 2006. Dizque: a Colombian evidentiality strategy. Linguistics 441. 1269–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 611. 480–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a Comparative Overview of the Category in Panoan. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2018. Evidentials and epistemic modality. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 85–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman and Barbara Shaffer. 2018. Evidentiality and information source in signed languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 741–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross–linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121. 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2018. Evidentiality in Boran and Witotoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 388–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2011. The grammaticalization of modality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 595–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.