Article published In:
Evidentiality and Modality
Edited by Eric Mélac
[Studies in Language 48:3] 2024
► pp. 638681
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The grammaticalization of evidentiality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 605–613. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2018aThe Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bEvidentiality: The framework. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 1–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AnderBois, Scott
2014On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 241. 234–254. Ithaca, New York: LSA and CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
2018Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, 219–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Howard I.
1982Georgian: A reading grammar. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter
2006Algonquian verb structure: Plains Cree. In Grażyna J. Rowicka & Eithine B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the America, 3–27. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bartee, Ellen Lynn
2007A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.
Bialek, Joanna
2018The Proto-Tibetan clusters sL- and sR- and the periodisation of Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 17(2). 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Naming the empire: From Bod to Tibet. A philologico-historical study on the origin of the polity. Revue d’Études Tibétaines 611. 339–402.Google Scholar
2022A textbook in Classical Tibetan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2023 “ bcan pos who were not khri: Royal titulature and the succession to the throne in the Tibetan Empire.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 86 (1): 121–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bielmeier, Roland, Katrin Häsler, Chungda Haller, Felix Haller, Veronika Hein, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Thomas Preiswerk, Ngawang Tsering, Manuel Widmer, & Marius Zemp
2018 Comparative dictionary of Tibetan dialects (CDTD). Volume 21: Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bielmeier, Roland
2004Shafer’s proto-West Bodish hypothesis and the formation of the Tibetan verb paradigms. In Anju Saxena (ed.), Himalayan languages, past and present, 395–412. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter, Andrej Malchukov, Iris Rieder, Linlin Sun, Marvin Martiny & Svenja Luell
2020Position paper: Universal and areal patterns in grammaticalization. In Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.) Grammaticalization scenarios from Europe and Asia. Volume 11, 1–88. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blass, Regina
1989Grammaticalisation of interpretive use: The case of re in Sissala. Lingua 79(4). 299–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botne, Robert
1995The pronominal origin of an evidential. Diachronica 12(2). 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1).1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brosig, Benjamin & Elena Skribnik
2018Evidentiality in Mongolic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 554–579. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca
1987The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl
Bybee, Joan
2003Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 151–174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chang, Kun & Betty Chang
1984The certainty hierarchy among Spoken Tibetan verbs of being. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 55(4). 603–635.Google Scholar
COCA: Corpus of Contemporary American English. Mark Davis
(2008–) Available at: [URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Coronel-Molina, Serafín M.
2011Marcadores de evidencialidad en hablantes bilingües de Quechua- Castellano. In Willem F. H. Adelaar, Pilar Valenzuela Bismarck & Roberto Zariquiey Biondi (eds.), Estudios sobre lenguas andinas y amazónicas. Homenaje a Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino, 391–411. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2019Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne M. Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.). Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press. Available at [URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
2013Perfective/Imperfective Aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI logo (Available online at [URL], last access 19 May 2023.)
Davoine, Justine
2010Paraît qu’ c’est joli la vie d’Juliette. Hallennes-Lez-HaubourdinGoogle Scholar
Dba’ = Dba’ bzhed, apud Pasang Wangdu & Hildegard Diemberger
2000.Google Scholar
de Jong, Jan Willem
1959Mi la ras paʼi rnam thar: texte tibétain de la vie de Milarépa. Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1985Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 65–72.Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick, & Liliane Tasmowski
2001Introduction Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 339–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick
1993Le conditionnel de l’information incertaine: Marqueur modal ou marqueur évidentiel? In Gerold Hitty (ed.), Actes du 20e Congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes, Volume 11, 165–176. Halle: Francke.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip
2007The language history of Tibetan. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 47–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doney, Lewis
(ed.) 2020Bringing Buddhism to Tibet. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David M.
2018Evidentiality in Nambikwara languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 333–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebihara, Shiho
2017Evidentiality of the Tibetan verb snang . In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.). Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 41–59. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Èdel’man, Džoy J. I.
1975Kategorii vremeni i vida. In Vera S. Rastorgueva (ed.), Opyt istoriko-tipologičeskogo issledovanija iranskix jazykov, Volume 21, 337–411. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
2000Šungano- rušanskaja gruppa. In Vera S. Rastorugueva (ed.), Iranskie jazyki III: Vostočnoiranskie iranskie jaziky, 208–224. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Emkow, Carola
2012Araona. In Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia. Tomo 21: Amazonía, 155–189. La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
Esteban, Avelino Corral
2015Layers and operators in Lakota. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 361. 1–33.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
2003Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 291–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.
2018Where do evidentials come from? In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallica
[URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Garrett, Edward John
2001Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2022From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar: A natural evolution of the paradigm. Studies in Language 47(4), 743–788.Google Scholar
GLR = Bsod-nams Rgyal-mtshan
1750–1760 [1368]Rgyal rabs gsal ba’i me long. Edited by Bla-ma chen-po Kun-dga’ ’Phrin-las Rgya-mtsho. Sde-dge.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2000The relevance of extravagance: A reply to Bart Geurts. Linguistics 381. 789–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change? In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne M. Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press. [URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 149–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2013 ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
2017Perfect experiential constructions: The inferential semantics of direct evidence. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 131–159. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan
1994Historical development of the Tibetan evidential tuu . In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, 673–684. Osaka: The Organizing Committee, The 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007Grammatical peculiarities of two dialects of southern Kham Tibetan. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 119–152. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Bernd Heine & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IDP = International Dunhuang Project
Izvorski, Roumyana
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory VII1, 222–239. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kany, Charles E.
1944Impersonal dizque and its variants in American Spanish. Hispanic Review 12(2). 168–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, Hajime
1977Tibetan: Lhasa Dialect. Tokyo: Asia Africa Gengo Bunka Kenkyūjo, Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G.
2000Emerging modals. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1975 [1965]The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses linguistiques 21. 38–54.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania
1995The Auxiliation Constraint and Reference. In Richard Geiger (ed.), Reference in multidisciplinary perspective: Philosophical object, cognitive subject, intersubjective process, 374–386. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
2004Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
(eds.) 2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2001Principles of linguistic change. Social factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003Dulong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 674–682. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
1989Grammatikalisierung und lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42(1). 11–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L.
1985 [1967]Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn
2009A grammar of Oksapmin. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
Maisak, Timur & Solmaz Merdanova
2002Kategorija evidencial’nosti v agul’skom jazyke, Kavkazovedenie 11. 102–112.Google Scholar
Mélac, Éric
2014L’évidentialité en anglais: Approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais-tibétain. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
2018Pour une taxonomie du changement linguistique: Comment redéfinir la grammaticalisation. In Sylvie Hancil (ed.), Fonctionnements linguistiques et grammaticalisation, 29–57. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
2021Evidentiality and its grammaticalization in French: A contrastive study based on a spoken French-Tibetan corpus. Presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea (30 August – 3 September 2021).Google Scholar
2022The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language & Linguistics 26(2). 331–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023The pragmatic differences between grammatical and lexical evidentiality: A corpus-based study of Tibetan and English. Journal of Pragmatics 2101. 143–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mélac, Eric, Nicolas Tournadre & Alexandra Aikhenvald
Forthcoming. Speaking of oneself in multi-term evidential systems: From the Himalayas to Amazonia.
ML = Mi-la Ras-pa’s Rnam thar, apud de Jong
1959.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2012Lehmann’s parameters revisited. In Bert Cornillie & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 73–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oisel, Guillaume
2013Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire: étude diachronique et synchronique. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
2017aOn the origin of the Lhasa Tibetan evidentials song and byung . In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 161–183. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bRe-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan linguistics 16(2). 90–128.Google Scholar
OTDO = Old Tibetan Documents
Online: [URL] (last access 15 December 2023).
Seiler, Walter
1985Imonda, a Papuan language. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. & Ayhan A. Aksu
1982Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1997The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 51: Expanding the contexts, 265–324. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2001The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language 25(2). 297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Extragrammatical expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 273–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
Forthcoming. Functional transition from ‘hear’ to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories: A case study of rGyalthang Tibetan.
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume 11: Concept structuring systems. Harvard, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2001From resultatives to evidentials: multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Dagestanian languages, Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Évidencial’nost’ i admirativ v bagvalinskom jazyke. in Viktor S. Chrakovskij (ed.), Évidencial’nost’ v jazykax Evropy i Azii, 351–397. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Telles, Stella & W. Leo Wetzels
2006Evidentiality and epistemic mood in Lakondê. In Grazyna J. Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, 235–252. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Thornell, Christina
1997The Sango language and its lexicon (Sêndâ-yângâ tî sängö). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
2003Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and civilization. (1st ed. in 1996 Manuel de tibétain standard. L’Asiathèque). Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2023The Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan. Villejuif: LACITO.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1994Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de langues 2(3). 149–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996aComparaison des systèmes médiatifs en tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.) 1996 L’Énonciation médiatisée, 195–213. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
1996bL’ergativité en tibétain: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Tribur, Zoe
2017Observations on factors affecting the distributional properties of evidential markers in Amdo Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.). Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 367–421. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Driem, George
1998Dzongkha. Leiden: Leiden University Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Vokurková, Zuzana
2008Epistemic modalities in spoken Standard Tibetan. Paris: Filozofická Fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Université Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
2017Epistemic modality in spoken standard Tibetian: epistemic verbal endings and copulas. Prague: Charles University, Karolinum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vykypěl, Bohumil
2010Das Problem der sprachlichen elementarverwandtschaft. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Wangdu, Pasang & Hildegard Diemberger
2000dBa’ bzhed: the royal narrative concerning the bringing of the Buddha’s doctrine to Tibet. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Juana I. Marin-Arrese
(eds.) 2022Evidential marking in European languages: Toward a unitary comparative account. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Turrell
1959A standard system of Tibetan transcription. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 221. 261–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bThe emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): The case of ḥdug and snaŋ . Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(2). 259–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in the Tibetic languages. In Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder (eds.), Evidence for evidentiality, 227–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zemp, Marius
2018A grammar of Purik Tibetan. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
1997Retention in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 81. 207–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1949Human behavior and the principle of least-effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar