Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:1 (2000) ► pp.204221
Comrie, Bernard; and Smith, Norval
1977 “Questionnaire”. Lingua 42/1: 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demircan, Ömer
1987 “Emphatic reduplication in Turkish”. In: Boeschoten, H.; and Verhoeven, L. (eds), Studies in Modern Turkish: proceedings of the 3rd conference on Turkish 24–41. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Hatibolu, Vecihe
1973Pekiştirme ve kurallarn. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon; and Orgun, Cemil Orhan
1995 “Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish”. Language 71/4: 763–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko
1990 “Prosodic minimality in Japanese”. In: Ziolkowski, Michael; Noske, Manuela; et al. (eds), Papers from the twenty-sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Volume 2: the parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology 213–39. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko and Hankamer, Jorge
1989 “Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish”. In: Itô, Junko; and Runner, Jeff (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz 61–69. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen
1986 “Locating Turkish devoicing”. In: Dalrymple, Mary; Goldberg, Jeffrey; Hanson, Kristin; Inman, Michael; Piñon, Chris; and Wechsler, Stephen (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 119–128. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982 “Lexical morphology and phonology”. In: I. -S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1961The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey
1967Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1973The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Prince, Alan
1993 “Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction”. To be published by MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin
1994 “The quantitative trochee in Latin”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 121: 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 “The evolution of noun incorporation”. Language 60/4: 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 “On the nature of noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P.
1982Lexical phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
1986The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan
1998 “Cyclic and noncyclic phonological effects in a declarative grammar”. Booij, G.; and van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of morphology 1997: 179–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sezer, Engin
1981 “The k/0 alternation in Turkish”. In Clements, George N. (ed.), Harvard studies in phonology 354–382. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
1990 “Predicting rule domains in the phrasal phonology”. In: Inkelas, Sharon; and Zec, Draga (eds), The phonology-syntax connection 289–312. Chicago: CSLI Publications and the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1989A grammar of Slave. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M.
1986 .”Some notes on noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta
1989The phonology-morphology interface: cycles, levels, and words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert
1976Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert
1997The phonology of Armenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1998 “Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology”. Lapointe, S. G.; Brentari, D. K.; and Farrell, P. M. (eds), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax 216–246. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl; and Abbott, Barbara
1978 “The k/0 alternation in Turkish: some experimental evidence for its productivity”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 71: 35–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl
1994Parsing below the segment in a constraint based framework. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar