Cover not available
Review article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp.423–439
Review article

Frederick J. Newmeyer. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press, 1998. xix + 428 pp.

Reviewer
| University of Durham
Published online: 6 September 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.2.08tal
References (21)
References
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “On wh-movement”. In: Culicover, Peter; Akmajian, Adrian; and Wasow, Thomas (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1995. “Autonomy and functionalist linguistics”. Language 711: 490–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Michael; Moravcsik, Edith; Newmeyer, Frederick; Noonan, Michael; and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.). 1999a. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume I1: General papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(eds.). 1999b. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume II1: Case studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1991. “SVO languages and the VO: OV typology”. Journal of Linguistics 271: 443–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “The Greenbergian word order correlations”. Language 681: 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1987. “On the operation of communicative dynamism in functional sentence perspective”. Leuvense Bijdragen 761: 289–304.Google Scholar
Foley, William; and Van Valin, Robert. 1984. Functional syntaxand Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1988. “The pragmatics of word order: predictability, importance, and attention”. In: Hammond, Michael; Moravcsik, Edith; and Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.). 1986. Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1998a. “Emergent grammar”. In: Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1998b. “The paradigm at the end of the universe”. In: Ramat, Anna Giacalone; and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 147–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward; & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1977. “An acceptable ambiguity in Modern Irish”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 604–609.Google Scholar
. 1990. “Resumptive pronouns, Ā-binding and levels of representation in Irish”. In: Hendrick, Randall (ed.) The syntax of the modern Celtic languages. Syntax and Semantics vol. 231 199–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. “Definite NP anaphora and c-command”. Linguistic Inquiry 121: 605–635.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Foolen, Ad
2002. Frederick J. Newmeyer’sLanguage Form and Language Function. Functions of Language 9:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.