Review article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp.423439
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977 “On wh-movement”. In: Culicover, Peter; Akmajian, Adrian; and Wasow, Thomas (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1995 “Autonomy and functionalist linguistics”. Language 711: 490–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Michael; Moravcsik, Edith; Newmeyer, Frederick; Noonan, Michael; and Wheatley, Kathleen
(eds.) 1999aFunctionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume I1: General papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1999bFunctionalism and formalism in linguistics. Volume II1: Case studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1991 “SVO languages and the VO: OV typology”. Journal of Linguistics 271: 443–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “The Greenbergian word order correlations”. Language 681: 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1987 “On the operation of communicative dynamism in functional sentence perspective”. Leuvense Bijdragen 761: 289–304.Google Scholar
Foley, William; and Van Valin, Robert
1984Functional syntaxand Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1988 “The pragmatics of word order: predictability, importance, and attention”. In: Hammond, Michael; Moravcsik, Edith; and Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Prinzhorn, Martin
(eds.) 1986Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1994A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1998a “Emergent grammar”. In: Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1998b “The paradigm at the end of the universe”. In: Ramat, Anna Giacalone; and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 147–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward; & Comrie, Bernard
1977 “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James
1977 “An acceptable ambiguity in Modern Irish”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 604–609.Google Scholar
1990 “Resumptive pronouns, Ā-binding and levels of representation in Irish”. In: Hendrick, Randall (ed.) The syntax of the modern Celtic languages. Syntax and Semantics vol. 231 199–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1988Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981 “Definite NP anaphora and c-command”. Linguistic Inquiry 121: 605–635.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Foolen, Ad
2002. Frederick J. Newmeyer’sLanguage Form and Language Function. Functions of Language 9:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.