Nouns, verbs and syntactic backsliding in Khmer
One of the difficulties in parsing Khmer is that morphosyntactic clues about the category membership of words are either lacking or misleading. In particular, words which seem to have the status of deverbal nominalizations because of a derivational infix -Vm(n)- are in fact “still”functioning as verbs. It may be that this phenomenon of “syntactic backsliding” provides novel evidence for the hypothesis that this infix was originally meaningless, and that infixation arose in Khmer via the process of “secretion”.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Haiman, John
2010.
The creation of new words.
Linguistics 48:3
Haiman, John
2013.
Decorative morphology in Khmer. In
The Aesthetics of Grammar,
► pp. 61 ff.
Haiman, John
2017.
Exaptation. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax,
► pp. 49 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.