Book review
Rosina Márquez Reiter. Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 83]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. xvii, 225 pp.
References (29)
References
Antony, Louise M.; and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.). 2003. Chomsky and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. in press. “Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics.
Bonikowska, Małgozata P. 1988. “The choice of opting out”. Applied Linguistics 91: 169–181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Rong. 2001. “Self-politeness: A proposal”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 87–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Johathan; Bousfield, Derek; and Wichmann, Anne. In press. “Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects”. Journal of Pragmatics.
DuFon, Margaret A.; Kasper, Gabriele; Takahashi, Satomi; and Yoshinaga, Naoko. 1994. “Bibliography on linguistic politeness”. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 527–578. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gill, Virginia Teas; Halkowski, Timothy; and Roberts, Felicia. 2001. “Accomplishing a request without making one: A single case analysis of a primary care visit”. TEXT 211: 55–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golato, Andrea. 2002. “German compliment responses”. Journal of Pragmatics 341: 547–571. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golato, Andrea. 2003. “Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally talk”. Applied Linguistics 241: 90–121. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet; and Stubbe, Maria. 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace. London: Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness”. Multilingua 81: 223–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaworski, Adam. 1993. The Power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. “Linguistic politeness: Current research issues”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 193–218. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Gabriele. 2000. “Data collection in pragmatics research”. In: Spencer-Oately, Helen (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures 316–341. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kurzon, Dennis. 2001. “The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 61–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Yi. 2001. The dynamics of politeness. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2001. “Compliment responses among British and Spanish university students: A contrastive study”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 107–127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pizziconi, Barbara. In press. “Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language”. Journal of Pragmatics.
Sifianou, Maria. 1995. “Indirectness and politeness: the case of English and Greek”. In: Huang, Y.; Kerswill, P.; Ingham, R.; and Shockey, L. (eds.), Reading working papers in linguistics 21 241–253. Reading: University of Reading Department of Linguistic Science.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria. 1997. “Silence and politeness”. In: Jaworski, A. (ed.), Silence: Interdiscipline perspectives 63–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xie, Chaoqun. 2003. “Review of Gino Eelen (2001)”. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 811–818. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuan, Yi. 2001. “An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 271–292. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Xie, Chaoqun & Dajin Lin
2004.
Reviews.
Journal of English Linguistics 32:1
► pp. 48 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Xie, Chaoqun, Dajin Lin & Bingyun Li
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.