Cover not available
Review article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 28:2 (2004) ► pp.419–441
Review article

Alice C. Harris. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, . xvi, 299 pp.

reviewer
| University of Munich
Published online: 28 July 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.2.07sch
References (24)
References
Aleksidze, Zaza & Jean-Pierre Mahé. 1997. Découverte d’un texte albanien: une langue ancienne du Caucase retrouvée. CRAI 1997: 517–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aleksidze, Zaza. 1998–2000. Remarques sur le déchriffrement de l’écriture albano-caucasienne. RArm 271:423–428.Google Scholar
Aleksidze, Zaza & Jean-Pierre Mahé. 2001. Le déchiffrement de l’écriture des Albaniens du Caucase. CRAI 2001 [in press]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aleksidze, Zaza & Jean-Pierre Mahé & Jost Gippert & Wolfgang Schulze (in preparation). The Caucasian-Albanian Palimpsest from Mt. Sinai. Edition and interpretation [working title]. Monumenta Paleographica Medii Aevi. Turnhout: Brepols.
Bežanov, Semjon & Bežanov, Mikhail. 1902. Gospoda Našego Iisusa Xrista Svajtoe Ėvangelie ot Matfeja, Marka, Luki i Ioanna. Tiflis: Typ. Kancelarii Glav. 1902 (Sbornik Material djla Opisanija Plemen i Mestnostej Kavkaza XXX1).Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl. 1939. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Udischen auf Grund neuer Texte. WZKM 931:60–72.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost & Manana Tandašvili. 2002. Audio-visual Materials from Okt’omberi. To be published as DOBES report “Three endangered languages in Georgia”.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1992. The Particle -a in Udi. In: Howard I. Aronson (ed.). The Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR: Linguistic Studies, 135–156. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistics Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kechaari, Georgi [Zhora] 1995. Nana oćal. šeirxo, hekyätxo. Bäku: Azb. dövläti näširiyät.Google Scholar
Kechaari, Georgi. 2001. Orayin. Bakı: Azәrbaycan Dövlәt Nәš riyyatı.Google Scholar
. 2003. Buruxmux. Gәncә: Agah nәşriyәt.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexandr E. (red.) 1999. Ėlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom ocveščenii. Moskva: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith L. 1979. ‘On Clitics as Words’. CLS parasession volume, 68–80.Google Scholar
Schiefner, Anton. 1863. Versuch über die Sprache der Uden. Mémoires de l’Akadémie impériale de sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, VII série, vol. vi., no. 8. St. Peterburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 1982. Die Sprache der Uden in Nord-Azerbaidzhan. Studien zur Synchronie und Diachronie einer süd-ostkaukasischen Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2000a. The Accusative Ergative Continuum. General Linguistics 371:71–155.Google Scholar
. 2000b. Northern Talysh. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2001a. An Udi Online Grammar. Electronic version. University of Munich, ([URL]).
. 2001b. The Udi Gospels. Annotated Text, Etymological Index, Lemmatized Concordance. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
(in press a). Towards a History of Udi. Bayram Balci & Gilles Authier (eds.). Papers of the IFEA Round Table on Caucasian Languages (Istanbul 2003). Istanbul: IFEA.Google Scholar
(in press b). Pragmasyntax: Towards a cognitive typology of the attention information flow in Udi narratives. Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.). Linguagem, Cultura e Cognição. Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva. Coimbra: Almedina.
(in press c). From Case to Case in Udi. Russian version: Svetlana Makhmudova (ed.). Typologija dagestanskix jazykov. Makhachkala: IIJaL AN.
(forthcoming). A Functional Grammar of Udi (to appear 2005).Google Scholar