Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 3:2 (1979) ► pp.253261
Andersen, H.
1972Dipthongization. Lg. 481.11–50.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.
1973Structural aspects of language change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anttila, R.
1972An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1976Who is a structuralist? Linguistics and literary studies in honor of Archibald A. Hill, ed. by M. Ali Jazayery et al.. 63–73. Lisse: De Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Arlotto, A.
1972Introduction to historical linguistics. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.
1973Canadian raising. CLJ 181.113–35.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1964Current issues in linguistic theory. The structure of language, ed. by J. Fodor and J. Katz. 50–118. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1968The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by E. Bach and R. Harms. 1–88. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Halle, M.
1962Phonology in generative grammar. Word 181.54–72. Reprinted 1964, The structure of language, ed. by J. Fodor and J. Katz. 334–352. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.
1976Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 381.89–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C.
1954Two models of grammatical description. Word 101.210–234. Reprinted 1966, Readings in Linguistics I1, ed. by M. Joos. 386–399. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1958, A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, H.
1960Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, J.
1976An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Joos, M.
1942A phonological dilemma in Canadian English. Lg. 181.141–144.Google Scholar
King, R.
1972A note on opacity and paradigm regularity. LI 31.534–539.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
1968Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by E. Bach and R. Harms. 170–202. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
1971Historical linguistics. A survey of linguistic science, ed. by W. Dingwall. 577–649. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
1973How abstract is phonology? and Abstractness, opacity and ordered rules. Three dimensions of linguistic theory, ed. by O. Fujimura. 5–86. Tokyo: TEC Corp.Google Scholar
1974On the evaluation measure. Natural phonology, ed. by A. Bruck et al.. 328–337. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. and L. Menn
1977On the acquisition of phonology. Language learning and thought, ed. by J. Macnamara. 47–78. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W.
1973Historical linguistics, an introduction, 2nd ed. (1st ed. 1962) New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Samuels, M.
1972Linguistic evolution. London: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
1921Language. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Schane, S.
1971The phoneme revistited. Lg. 471.503–521.Google Scholar
1973Generative phonology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Skousen, R.
1975Substantive evidence in phonology. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A.
1977Modern phonology. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.
1929Sur la ‘morphonologie’. TCLP 11.85–88. Reprint 1964 Prague school reader in linguistics, ed. by J. Vachek. 183–86. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T.
1972aPhonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. Schuchardt, the neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change, ed. by T. Vennemann and T. Wilbur. 181–204. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
1972bRule inversion. Lingua 291.209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974aRestructuring. Lingua 331. 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974bTopics, subjects, and word order: from SXV to SVX via TVX. Historical linguistics, ed. by J. Anderson and C. Jones. vol. 11, 339–375. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Whitney, W.
1971The varieties of predication. Whitney on language: selected writings of William Dwight Whitney, ed. by M. Silverstein. 192–7. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar