Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 30:1 (2006) ► pp.179183
Büring, Daniel
(2004) The syntax and semantics of binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard
(1997) “Accessibility theory in a variable syntax of SpanishJournal of Pragmatics 281, 29–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(ed.) (1980) The pear stories. Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
(1999) “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo”. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española. Vol. 11: 1317–1397. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier
(2002) “Demonstratives in context.” In Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), From words to discourse. Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics, 195–236. Oxford/New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
(2003) “Constraint interaction at the semantics/pragmatics interface: the case of clitic doubling.” In K. M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.) Meanings in contrast: The Cambridge papers, 335–354. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
(1984) “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: q-based and r-based implicature”. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, form and use in context. linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
(1991) “A Neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphoraJournal of Linguistics 271, 301–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
(2000) Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Daniel and Deirdre Wilson
(1986/1995) Relevance theory: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar